미국의 MaaS(Microgrid as a Service) 시장 규모, 점유율, 동향 분석 리포트 : 그리드 유형별, 서비스 유형별, 부문별 예측(2025-2030년)

U.S. Microgrid As A Service Market Trends:

The U.S. microgrid as a service market size was valued at USD 953.2 million in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 12.0% from 2025 to 2030. The market growth is being driven by increasing demand for renewable energy integration, the need for resilient power infrastructure, and supportive government policies and incentives. Microgrid as a service is a turnkey solution that includes design, installation, operation, and maintenance of microgrids, providing energy reliability and resilience without the need for upfront capital investment. It is primarily deployed across sectors such as industrial, commercial, military, and educational institutions. This model supports decarbonization goals, enhances grid independence, and improves energy cost predictability.

In January 2023, AlphaStruxure announced an agreement to construct, design, and operate microgrid infrastructure at the John F. Kennedy International Airport. The microgrid infrastructure at New Terminal One (NTO) will provide resilient, sustainable, cost-predictable, and locally generated energy.

In the energy infrastructure sector, microgrid as a service (MaaS) has become essential for delivering reliable, efficient, and resilient power solutions, especially for critical facilities such as hospitals, military bases, universities, and data centers. MaaS enables these institutions to operate independently from the main grid during outages or peak demand, ensuring continuous operation and energy security. Its turnkey model-covering design, installation, financing, and maintenance-eliminates upfront capital requirements, making advanced energy systems more accessible. Rising concerns over climate resilience, aging grid infrastructure, and increasing demand for uninterrupted power drive widespread MaaS adoption in both public and private sectors.

In commercial and industrial settings, MaaS supports decarbonization goals by integrating renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and battery storage. It allows companies to optimize energy use, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and meet corporate sustainability targets. MaaS systems also manage energy costs through peak shaving, demand response, and load optimization. The model offers predictable long-term operating expenses, enabling businesses to shift from a capital-intensive model to a service-based energy strategy.

Microgrids are also being adopted in underserved or remote communities, where traditional grid expansion is impractical. MaaS providers offer scalable, localized power systems that support economic development and improve quality of life. Technological advancements in digital energy management platforms, AI-based control systems, and battery efficiency are accelerating MaaS deployment, making it more adaptive and data-driven.

U.S. Microgrid As A Service Market Report Segmentation

This report forecasts revenue growth at U.S. level and provides an analysis of the latest industry trends in each of the sub-segments from 2018 to 2030. For this study, Grand View Research has segmented the U.S. microgrid as a service industry report based on grid type and service type.

• Grid Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)
• Islanded
• Grid Connected
• Service Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)
• Software as a Service
• Monitoring & Control Service
• Operation & Maintain Service

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope

• 1.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Information Procurement
  • 1.3.1. Purchased Database
  • 1.3.2. GVR's Internal Database
  • 1.3.3. Secondary Raw Materials & Third-Party Perspectives
  • 1.3.4. Primary Research
• 1.4. Information Analysis
  • 1.4.1. Data Analysis Models
• 1.5. Market Formulation & Data Visualization
• 1.6. Data Validation & Publishing

Chapter 2. Executive Summary

• 2.1. Market Snapshot
• 2.2. Segment Snapshot
• 2.3. Competitive Landscape Snapshot

Chapter 3. U.S. Microgrid as a Service Market Variables, Trends & Scope

• 3.1. Market Lineage Outlook
  • 3.1.1. Parent Market Outlook
  • 3.1.2. Related Market Outlook
• 3.2. Industry Value Chain Analysis
• 3.3. Regulatory Framework
• 3.4. Market Dynamics
  • 3.4.1. Market Driver Analysis
  • 3.4.2. Market Restraint Analysis
  • 3.4.3. Industry Challenges
  • 3.4.4. Industry Opportunities
• 3.5. Industry Analysis Tools
  • 3.5.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 3.5.2. Macro-environmental Analysis

Chapter 4. U.S. Microgrid as a Service Market: Grid Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

• 4.1. Segment Dashboard
• 4.2. U.S. Microgrid as a Service Market: Grid Type Movement Analysis & Market Share, 2024 & 2030
• 4.3. Islanded
  • 4.3.1. Islanded Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• 4.4. Grid Connected
  • 4.4.1. Grid Connected Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 5. U.S. Microgrid as a Service Market: Service Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

• 5.1. Segment Dashboard
• 5.2. U.S. Microgrid as a Service Market: Service Type Movement Analysis & Market Share, 2024 & 2030
• 5.3. Software as a Service
  • 5.3.1. Software as a Service Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• 5.4. Monitoring & Control Service
  • 5.4.1. Monitoring & Control Service Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• 5.5. Operation & Maintenance Service
  • 5.5.1. Operation & Maintenance Service Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 6. U.S. Microgrid as a Service Market - Competitive Landscape

• 6.1. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, By Key Market Participants
• 6.2. Company Categorization
• 6.3. Company Heat Map
• 6.4. Position Analysis, 2024
• 6.5. Strategy Mapping
  • 6.5.1. Expansion
  • 6.5.2. Mergers & Acquisition
  • 6.5.3. Partnerships & Collaborations
• 6.6. Company Profiles
  • 6.6.1. ABB Ltd.
    • 6.6.1.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.1.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.1.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.1.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.2. Aggreko
    • 6.6.2.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.2.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.2.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.2.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.3. AlphaStruxure
    • 6.6.3.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.3.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.3.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.3.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.4. Ameresco
    • 6.6.4.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.4.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.4.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.4.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.5. Anbaric Development Partners, LLC.
    • 6.6.5.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.5.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.5.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.5.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.6. Eaton
    • 6.6.6.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.6.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.6.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.6.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.7. General Electric Company
    • 6.6.7.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.7.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.7.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.7.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.8. Parento Energy
    • 6.6.8.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.8.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.8.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.8.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.9. PowerSecure, Inc.
    • 6.6.9.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.9.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.9.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.9.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.10. Schneider Electric
    • 6.6.10.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.10.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.10.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.10.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.11. Siemens
    • 6.6.11.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.11.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.11.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.11.4. Recent developments
  • 6.6.12. Spirae, LLC
    • 6.6.12.1. Participant's overview
    • 6.6.12.2. Financial performance
    • 6.6.12.3. Film Type benchmarking
    • 6.6.12.4. Recent developments