세계의 어깨관절 재건 장치 시장 : 시장 규모, 점유율, 동향 분석(2025-2031년)

The global shoulder reconstruction device market was valued at over $2.1 billion in 2024. It is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 6.8 percent to surpass $3.4 billion by 2031.

This report covers total shoulder implants, reversed shoulder implants, hemi shoulder implants, resurfacing shoulder implants, revision shoulder implants, and proximal humerus plates and screws. It quantifies unit sales, average selling prices, market size, growth rates, and company shares and analyzes market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, product portfolios, and competitive dynamics. The study provides historical data to 2021 and forecasts to 2031.

Digital tools are improving precision in the operating room. 3D planning software, navigation systems, and intraoperative alignment aids are gaining use because shoulder outcomes depend on accurate glenoid positioning and restoration of joint biomechanics. These tools support more predictable results and help surgeons adopt next-generation systems with greater confidence.

Market Overview

Global demand for shoulder reconstruction continues to expand as the procedure set matures beyond early adopters. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has moved from a specialized option to a routine solution for cuff-deficient shoulders and complex degenerative cases. Its role in revision pathways has also grown, which increases addressable volume and supports a stable upgrade cycle for implants and instruments.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty remains a core procedure. Surgeons are replacing older stemmed designs with stemless and modular systems that conserve bone, simplify exposure, and make future revisions more manageable. On the trauma side, proximal humerus plating remains a high-volume category within orthopedics, which keeps shoulder reconstruction connected to fracture care in mixed practice settings.

The market is also shaped by workflow changes. More cases are moving to ambulatory surgery centers where predictable setup, shorter anesthesia times, and faster discharge are priorities. This shift favors streamlined instrumentation, clear alignment guides, and reproducible techniques that reduce operative time. As programs standardize training and protocols, vendors that offer complete platforms with planning, guides, and revision-ready constructs are gaining a competitive edge.

Price pressure continues, especially in tenders outside North America. Even so, sustained clinical need, an aging and active patient population, and wider surgeon familiarity with reverse and stemless systems support steady value growth through 2031.

Market Drivers

Dominance and versatility of reverse shoulder implants

Reverse systems are now the backbone of shoulder reconstruction. They address rotator cuff insufficiency, complex osteoarthritis, and many salvage situations. Their versatility in both primary and revision procedures makes them the default option when anatomic repair is unlikely to succeed. As indications broaden and outcomes remain consistent, reverse procedures continue to anchor market expansion.

Increased procedural volume in high-growth regions

North America is the largest market by value, yet the fastest compound growth is coming from Asia-Pacific, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East. These regions are investing in surgeon training and facility upgrades that move programs from trauma-only service to elective arthroplasty. As caseloads diversify and implant familiarity increases, shoulder reconstruction becomes a standard part of orthopedic offerings rather than a specialized referral.

Shift toward stemless and revision-compatible systems

The replacement of older stemmed designs with stemless and modular implants is accelerating. These systems minimize bone removal, can shorten operative time, and offer intraoperative flexibility when anatomy or bone quality differs from plan. Their compatibility with revision constructs creates strategic overlap between primary and revision segments and encourages hospitals to standardize on a single platform.

Digital planning and intraoperative alignment

Preoperative 3D planning clarifies version, inclination, and offset goals. Navigation and alignment aids help translate plan to execution, especially for glenoid work where small deviations affect stability and wear. This push toward plan-to-implant fidelity improves confidence, reduces variability across teams, and supports positive outcomes that sustain adoption.

Maturing revision pathways

Growing primary volumes naturally lead to more revision procedures. Systems that allow conversion from anatomic to reverse or support staged reconstruction with familiar instruments create clinical and economic advantages. As more centers build revision capacity, the pull for compatible components, augments, and constraint options grows with it.

Market Limiters

Accelerated ASP erosion through tender systems

Public tenders and consolidated procurement place heavy weight on price. This year-over-year ASP pressure, especially outside North America, limits the ability to position premium innovations at full value. Vendors must balance feature sets with affordability to remain competitive in tender-heavy regions.

Structural decline of resurfacing procedures

Resurfacing volumes continue to fall. Surgeons have shifted to stemless anatomic or reverse solutions that deliver reliable fixation and broader indications. With fewer surgeons trained or inclined to perform resurfacing, the segment's share declines further each year.

Uneven access to revision infrastructure

Revision surgery depends on specialized teams, advanced imaging, and comprehensive rehabilitation. Many health systems, especially in emerging markets, lack consistent access to these resources. As a result, revision-oriented implants underpenetrate in settings where the clinical need exists but service lines are still developing.

Market Coverage and Data Scope

• Quantitative coverage: Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and average selling prices.
• Qualitative coverage: Growth trends, market limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews.
• Time frame: Base year 2024, forecasts to 2031, historical data from 2021 to 2023.
• Data sources: Primary interviews with industry leaders, government physician data, regulatory filings, hospital and private practice inputs, import and export data, and the iData Research internal database.
• Method note: Revenue is modeled as units multiplied by ASP and validated against procedure volumes, utilization patterns, and replacement assumptions.

Care settings include hospitals, orthopedic specialty centers, and ambulatory surgery centers.

Markets Covered and Segmentation

Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market

• Device type:

Total shoulder implant

Reversed shoulder implant

Hemi shoulder implant

Resurfacing shoulder implant

Revision shoulder implant

Proximal humerus plate and screw

Each device category is analyzed for unit volume, ASP, and market value, with historical trends and forecast growth through 2031.

Competitive Analysis

Zimmer Biomet led the shoulder reconstruction device market in 2024. Its position reflects a comprehensive portfolio across anatomic and reverse arthroplasty with the Comprehensive(R) Shoulder System at the center. The platform's modularity supports intraoperative decisions, allows surgeons to tailor implants to variable anatomy, and provides continuity from primary to revision. Early participation in reverse shoulder and ongoing design refinements have built long-term surgeon loyalty across mixed practice settings.

Stryker held the second-leading position. The company focused resources on reverse shoulder arthroplasty and aligned its roadmap with the needs of rotator cuff-deficient and older patients. The Tornier acquisition provided established reverse designs in the United States and Europe. Stryker has since streamlined instrumentation and enhanced intraoperative flexibility. The company's limited presence in hemi and certain revision constructs reflects a deliberate choice to target high-growth, high-margin segments where clinical demand is strongest.

DePuy Synthes ranked third. Its strength sits at the intersection of trauma and shoulder, most notably proximal humerus plating. DePuy Synthes has integrated shoulder arthroplasty into a broader trauma ecosystem, leveraging widely used hardware and techniques among trauma surgeons. This creates a clinical pipeline from fracture management to elective shoulder reconstruction. The company's lower visibility in revision and resurfacing narrows its reach in comprehensive arthroplasty centers but fits well in trauma-heavy institutions.

Competition continues to focus on construct versatility, instrument efficiency, and digital planning. Vendors that simplify the move from plan to implant and support predictable conversion to revision hold advantages in training programs and high-volume centers.

Technology and Practice Trends

• 3D planning as standard practice: More teams use 3D planning to select glenoid size, version, and inclination targets and to anticipate bone defects.
• Navigation and alignment aids in the OR: Simple, dependable intraoperative tools help surgeons replicate plan details and manage outliers without adding excessive time.
• Stemless and bone-preserving designs: Bone-sparing implants support shorter exposure, easier extraction, and clearer revision paths.
• Modular systems for conversion: Platforms that convert from anatomic to reverse with familiar instruments reduce learning curve and inventory complexity.
• Instrument sets optimized for ASCs: Compact trays and clear steps support consistent turnover and shorter case times in outpatient settings.
• Revision-ready augments and constraint options: A growing menu of augments and liners helps address bone loss and soft-tissue imbalance during complex cases.

These trends reinforce each other. Planning improves implant selection, alignment aids improve execution, and modular systems preserve options for future care. The result is a more predictable experience that supports adoption across diverse care settings.

Geography

This edition provides global coverage across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.

Why This Report

Where are the largest and fastest-growing opportunities within shoulder reconstruction.

How are reverse, anatomic, and stemless systems reshaping product strategies and training paths.

Which digital planning and intraoperative alignment tools are gaining traction and why they matter for outcomes.

How do tender systems and pricing pressure affect launch strategies and portfolio mix outside North America.

What is the outlook for revision demand, and how should vendors align platforms and inventory to support it.

Which companies lead today, and how are Zimmer Biomet, Stryker, and DePuy Synthes positioning for share gains through 2031.

How can commercial teams plan for ASC migration, procedural standardization, and surgeon education needs across regions.

The Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market Report from iData Research answers these questions with procedure-aware models, pricing detail, and company share analysis.

Use it to quantify demand by device type, plan new product entries, set pricing and contracting targets, and prioritize training and support programs that speed adoption.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Research Methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market

• 4.1 Executive Summary
  • 4.1.1 Global Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market Overview
  • 4.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 4.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 4.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 4.1.5 Regions Included
• 4.2 Introduction
  • 4.2.1 Anatomy
  • 4.2.2 Pathology
  • 4.2.3 Joint Reconstruction Devices
    • 4.2.3.1 Anatomic Shoulder Implants
    • 4.2.3.2 Reversed Shoulder Implants
    • 4.2.3.3 Hemi Shoulder Implants
    • 4.2.3.4 Resurfacing Implants
    • 4.2.3.5 Shoulder Revision
    • 4.2.3.6 Proximal Humerus Plates and Screws
• 4.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 4.3.1 Total Shoulder Procedures
  • 4.3.2 Total Shoulder Replacement Procedures
  • 4.3.3 Reversed Shoulder Replacement Procedures
  • 4.3.4 Hemi Shoulder Replacement Procedures
  • 4.3.5 Shoulder Resurfacing Procedures
  • 4.3.6 Shoulder Revision Procedures
  • 4.3.7 Proximal Humerus ORIF Procedures
• 4.4 Market Overview
  • 4.4.1 By Segment
  • 4.4.2 By Region
• 4.5 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 4.5.1 Total Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market
  • 4.5.2 Total Shoulder Implant Market
    • 4.5.2.1 Stemmed Total Shoulder Implant Market
    • 4.5.2.2 Stemless Total Shoulder Implant Market
  • 4.5.3 Reversed Shoulder Implant Market
  • 4.5.4 Hemi Shoulder Implant Market
    • 4.5.4.1 Stemmed Hemi Shoulder Implant Market
    • 4.5.4.2 Stemless Hemi Shoulder Implant Market
  • 4.5.5 Resurfacing Shoulder Implant Market
  • 4.5.6 Revision Shoulder Implant Market
  • 4.5.7 Proximal Humerus Plate and Screw Market
• 4.6 Drivers and Limiters
  • 4.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 4.6.2 Market Limiters
• 4.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations