세계의 정형외과 외상기기 시장 : 규모, 점유율, 동향 분석(2025-2031년)

The global orthopedic trauma device market was valued at $7.4 billion in 2024. The market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.7%, reaching $8.9 billion by 2031.

This report covers plate and screw, bioabsorbable fixation, intramedullary nail, cannulated screw, intramedullary hip screw, conventional hip screw, staple fixation, bone pin, external fixation, and bone growth stimulation markets. The value of associated instruments used in these segments is excluded from the scope.

We quantify unit sales, average selling prices (ASPs), market values, growth rates, and company shares. We also analyze procedure volumes, market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, technology trends, and competitor strategies. Historical data to 2021 and forecasts through 2031 are provided.

Market Overview

Orthopedic trauma is a high-volume, core service line for hospitals across every region. The market's scale and stability reflect aging populations, growing participation in sports, rising road traffic injuries in developing regions, and better access to surgical care. Clinical practice has shifted toward implants and constructs that support early mobilization and reliable fixation, which improves function and reduces complications linked to prolonged immobilization.

Across major product families, titanium continues to gain share as costs have declined and as surgeons favor its strength-to-weight ratio and biocompatibility. This migration supports predictable outcomes with lower imaging artifact compared with stainless steel in some applications. At the same time, suppliers are exploring next-generation materials such as PEEK and carbon fiber for niche indications where radiolucency, elasticity closer to bone, or corrosion resistance are desired.

Design advances center on modularity and anatomic fit. Variable angle locking technology allows contouring without compromising screw purchase, while precontoured anatomic plates reduce intraoperative bending and help restore the native biomechanical axis. In intramedullary fixation, modern nails allow multidirectional locking and controlled compression. In screws, headless and dual-threaded designs help manage small-fragment fractures and minimize soft tissue irritation. These features support a steady price mix even as tender pressure is present in several regions.

Value-based purchasing and group tendering shape pricing in North America, Western Europe, and China. ASPs for commoditized products such as generic plates and common cannulated screws face ongoing pressure. Still, areas with clear clinical differentiation, including anatomic plates, advanced intramedullary systems, and bone growth stimulation, maintain stronger pricing. In parallel, external fixation shows mixed dynamics as equipment reuse persists in cost-constrained settings, despite hospital policies that discourage it.

Overall, the market outlook is stable to positive. Unit demand is supported by demographics and access to care, while value growth depends on sustained innovation, premiumization of select segments, and measured adoption of new materials where clinical data justify the added cost.

Market Drivers

Innovation

Innovation remains steady across trauma. PEEK and carbon fiber are under evaluation for plates and external fixation components where radiolucency and modulus closer to bone are beneficial. Meanwhile, the ongoing shift toward titanium is reinforced by improved affordability and surgeon preference, which sustains premium share versus stainless steel in many indications.

Device architectures are moving toward high modularity. Systems feature variable angle screw trajectories in plates and nails, controlled compression across fracture planes, and low-profile screw heads to limit soft tissue irritation. In small-fragment and foot and ankle cases, headless compression screws with dual threads provide interfragmentary compression with minimal prominence. These enhancements raise clinical utility and can support higher ASPs where tenders recognize differentiated outcomes.

Trend Toward Anatomic Plates

Anatomic plates are precontoured to restore natural alignment and to match typical bone geometry by site and side. Compared with generic plates, anatomic plates reduce intraoperative bending, preserve plate integrity, and help reconstruct the native axis of loading. Their higher ASP is justified by improved fit, reduced operating time, and better odds of early weight bearing when combined with stable fixation. As adoption widens, anatomic plate utilization lifts the blended ASP within plate and screw portfolios and supports the overall market value.

Clinical Outcomes

Intramedullary nails often permit earlier weight bearing than plate and screw fixation in the long bones for which they are indicated. This clinical benefit, together with lower rates of hardware prominence, keeps nails favored in femoral and tibial shaft fractures and in many intertrochanteric fractures where intramedullary hip screws dominate.

The bone growth stimulation market benefits from a growing body of outcomes data for difficult unions and nonunions, including applications of ultrasound and electrical stimulation. As documentation improves and indications are refined, adoption rises in patient cohorts where the value case is clearest.

Market Limiters

ASP Decreases

Hospital cost containment efforts and centralized procurement structures continue to pressure prices worldwide. Group purchasing organizations, government tendering, and transparent price benchmarking compress ASPs for commoditized items. Value-based procurement in China, which accelerated in 2021 and 2022, drove sharp price resets that influence regional contracts and competitive reactions. The expectation is for continued pricing vigilance in North America and Western Europe, with spillover effects in regions that reference these markets.

Rates of Equipment Reuse

In some systems, reuse of external fixation components persists. While not encouraged for safety reasons, it occurs due to budget constraints. Savings can be less than expected once sterilization and processing costs are included, and hospitals must balance cost with traceability and infection control standards. Reuse reduces new unit demand and adds variability to tender volumes in external fixation.

Commoditization of Products

As headless and specialty screws mature, headed cannulated screws and generic plates are increasingly viewed as commodities. When products are considered interchangeable, tenders prioritize price, logistics, and service response time. Commoditization limits the ability to command premiums unless suppliers demonstrate measurable clinical or workflow advantages.

Market Coverage and Data Scope

• Time Frame: Base year 2024, forecasts 2025-2031, historical data 2021-2023.
• Care Settings: Level I and II trauma centers, teaching hospitals, regional hospitals, orthopedic specialty hospitals, and high-volume ambulatory settings for minor fractures.
• Methodology: Revenues modeled as units X ASP, validated with procedure data, tender volumes, installed base checks, and replacement assumptions by region and facility type.

Market Segmentation

Plate and Screw Market

• Device type: Anatomical and Generic.

Bioabsorbable Fixation Market

Intramedullary Nail Market

• Anatomy: Humeral, Forearm, Femoral, Tibial, Ankle.

Cannulated Screw Market

• Material type: Stainless Steel, Titanium.

Intramedullary Hip Screw Market

• Material type: Stainless Steel, Titanium.

Conventional Hip Screw Market

• Material type: Stainless Steel, Titanium.

Staple Fixation Market

• Device type: Shape Memory, Mechanical Compression.

Bone Pin Market

External Fixation Device Market

• Device type: Unilateral, Circular.
• Anatomy: Shoulder Girdle, Upper Arm, Forearm, Hand and Wrist, Hip, Upper Leg, Knee, Lower Leg, Ankle, Foot and Toe.

Bone Growth Stimulation Market

• Device type: Ultrasound, Electrical.
• Quantitative Coverage: Market size, market shares, forecasts, growth rates, units, and ASPs.
• Qualitative Coverage: Market growth trends, limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, M&A activity, company profiles, product portfolios, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews.
• Data Sources: Primary interviews with industry leaders, regulatory and payer data, hospital and procurement inputs, import and export records, and the iData Research internal database.

Competitive Analysis

DePuy Synthes was the leading company in the global orthopedic trauma device market in 2024. Its position reflects category leadership in plates and screws, intramedullary nails, and external fixation. The company continues to expand platforms that integrate variable angle technology with broad anatomic coverage, and it invests in training programs that reinforce surgeon familiarity. Portfolio breadth and long clinical heritage keep DePuy Synthes at the top of hospital preference lists.

Stryker ranked second. The company leads the intramedullary hip screw and staple fixation segments, supported by recognized brands, including the Gamma(R) intramedullary hip system. Gamma helped shift practice away from conventional hip screws by improving control over fracture stability in intertrochanteric fractures. Stryker's platform approach, service support, and throughput of incremental product updates maintain high visibility in tenders and surgeon committees.

Zimmer Biomet held the third-largest share. Its strength is balanced across segments, with notable positions in cannulated screws and bone growth stimulation. A mixed portfolio of stainless steel and titanium constructs, plus investment in biologic and stimulation technologies, allows Zimmer Biomet to compete across a range of hospital budgets and case types.

Beyond the top three, regional champions and focused specialists play meaningful roles in tenders and private markets. These companies compete on logistics, service, and targeted design wins within specific anatomies. In emerging markets, locally manufactured generic plates, basic nails, and external fixators offer low-cost options that expand access while putting pressure on global ASPs for undifferentiated items.

Technology and Practice Trends

Locking technology as standard. Locking plate constructs, especially with variable angle options, are routine across upper and lower extremity anatomies and support stable fixation in osteoporotic bone.

Hybrid constructs. Surgeons combine intramedullary nails with adjunct plating or cerclage when indicated to address complex fracture patterns and restore alignment.

Low-profile and soft tissue friendly designs. Slimmer plate profiles, smoother transitions, and reduced screw head prominence lower the risk of irritation and secondary removal.

Radiolucent frames. Carbon fiber components in external fixation allow clearer intraoperative and postoperative imaging, which can improve assessment and pin placement.

Targeted compression. Nails and screws with controlled compression mechanisms enhance interfragmentary stability, supporting healing in fractures prone to motion.

Intraoperative efficiency. Color coding, guided instrumentation, and standardized trays reduce assembly time and errors, which matters in busy trauma centers.

Digital planning and templating. While less central than in arthroplasty, preoperative planning tools and digital templating improve implant selection and size prediction in complex cases.

Geography

This report provides global coverage across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.

Methodology Appendix and Acronym Glossary included.

Why This Report

Where are the largest and fastest-growing opportunities across plates and screws, nails, hip fracture systems, external fixation, and stimulation.

How will titanium migration, anatomic plate adoption, and variable angle features influence pricing and share.

What impact will value-based procurement and large tenders have on ASPs and category mix by region.

Which device and material innovations are most likely to justify premiums over commoditized alternatives.

How will equipment reuse and sterilization policies affect external fixation demand and purchasing patterns.

In what indications does bone growth stimulation show the strongest value case, and how will evidence shape adoption through 2031.

The Global Orthopedic Trauma Device Market Report from iData Research answers these questions with procedure-aware models, company share analysis, and pricing detail.

Use it to quantify demand, align product roadmaps, position premium features, and optimize tender strategies across regions and care settings.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Global Orthopedic Trauma Device Market Overview

Competitive Analysis

Market Trends

Market Developments

Procedure Segmentation

Procedure Codes Investigated

Market Segmentation

Regions Included

Key Report Updates

Version History

Research Methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

Global Orthopedic Trauma Device Market Overview

• 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.1.1 Anatomy
  • 3.1.2 Pathology And Healing
  • 3.1.3 Treatment Overview
    • 3.1.3.1 Internal Fixation
    • 3.1.3.2 External Fixation
    • 3.1.3.3 Bone Growth Stimulation
  • 3.1.4 Internal Fixation
    • 3.1.4.1 Plates And Screws
    • 3.1.4.2 Bioabsorbable Plates And Screws
    • 3.1.4.3 Intramedullary Nails
    • 3.1.4.4 Cannulated Screws
    • 3.1.4.5 Conventional Hip Screws
    • 3.1.4.6 Hip Intramedullary Nails
    • 3.1.4.7 Staples
    • 3.1.4.8 Bone Pins
  • 3.1.5 External Fixation
  • 3.1.6 Bone Growth Stimulation
• 3.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis
  • 3.2.1 By Segment
  • 3.2.2 By Region
• 3.3 Drivers And Limiters
  • 3.3.1 Market Drivers
  • 3.3.2 Market Limiters
• 3.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
• 3.5 Mergers And Acquisitions

Plate And Screw Market

• 4.1 Executive Summary
  • 4.1.1 Global Plate And Screw Market Overview
  • 4.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 4.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 4.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 4.1.5 Regions Included
• 4.2 Introduction
• 4.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 4.3.1 Anatomical Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.1 Clavicle Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.2 Proximal Humerus Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.3 Elbow Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.4 Distal Radius Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.5 Hand Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.6 Proximal Femur Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.7 Distal Femur Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.8 Proximal Tibia Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.9 Distal Fibia Plate And Screw Procedures
    • 4.3.1.10 Foot Plate And Screw Procedures
• 4.4 Overview
  • 4.4.1 By Segment
  • 4.4.2 By Region
• 4.5 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 4.5.1 Total Plate And Screw Market
  • 4.5.2 Anatomical Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.1 Clavicle Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.2 Proximal Humerus Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.3 Elbow Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.4 Distal Radius Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.5 Hand Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.6 Proximal Femur Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.7 Distal Femur Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.8 Proximal Tibia Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.9 Distal Tibia Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.2.10 Foot Plate And Screw Market
  • 4.5.3 Generic Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.3.1 Stainless-Steel Generic Plate And Screw Market
    • 4.5.3.2 Titanium Generic Plate And Screw Market
  • 4.5.4 Generic Plate And Screw Unit Analysis
    • 4.5.4.1 Stainless-Steel Generic Plate And Screw Unit Analysis
    • 4.5.4.2 Titanium Generic Plate And Screw Unit Analysis
• 4.6 Drivers And Limiters
  • 4.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 4.6.2 Market Limiters
• 4.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Bioabsorbable Fixation Market

• 5.1 Executive Summary
  • 5.1.1 Global Bioabsorbable Fixation Market Overview
  • 5.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 5.1.3 Regions Included
• 5.2 Introduction
• 5.3 Market Analysis And Forecast
• 5.4 Drivers And Limiters
  • 5.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 5.4.2 Market Limiters
• 5.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Intramedullary Nail Market

• 6.1 Executive Summary
  • 6.1.1 Global Intramedullary Nail Market Overview
  • 6.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 6.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 6.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 6.1.5 Regions Included
• 6.2 Introduction
• 6.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 6.3.1 Total Intramedullary Nail Procedures
• 6.4 Market Overview
  • 6.4.1 By Segment
  • 6.4.2 By Region
• 6.5 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 6.5.1 Total Intramedullary Nail Market
  • 6.5.2 Humeral Intramedullary Nail Market
  • 6.5.3 Forearm Intramedullary Nail Market
  • 6.5.4 Femoral Intramedullary Nail Market
  • 6.5.5 Tibial Intramedullary Nail Market
  • 6.5.6 Ankle Intramedullary Nail Market
• 6.6 Drivers And Limiters
  • 6.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 6.6.2 Market Limiters
• 6.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Cannulated Screw Market

• 7.1 Executive Summary
  • 7.1.1 Global Cannulated Screw Market Overview
  • 7.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 7.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 7.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 7.1.5 Regions Included
• 7.2 Introduction
  • 7.2.1 Product Description
    • 7.2.1.1.1 Headed Cannulated Screws
    • 7.2.1.1.2 Headless Cannulated Screws
• 7.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 7.3.1 Total Cannulated Screw Procedures
• 7.4 Market Overview
  • 7.4.1 By Segment
  • 7.4.2 By Region
• 7.5 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 7.5.1 Total Cannulated Screw Market
  • 7.5.2 Stainless-Steel Cannulated Screw Market
  • 7.5.3 Titanium Cannulated Screw Market
  • 7.5.4 Cannulated Screw Unit Analysis By Size
    • 7.5.4.1 Stainless-Steel Cannulated Screw Unit Analysis
    • 7.5.4.2 Titanium Cannulated Screw Unit Analysis
• 7.6 Drivers And Limiters
  • 7.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 7.6.2 Market Limiters
• 7.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Intramedullary Hip Screw Market

• 8.1 Executive Summary
  • 8.1.1 Global Intramedullary Hip Screw Market Overview
  • 8.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 8.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 8.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 8.1.5 Regions Included
• 8.2 Introduction
• 8.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 8.3.1 Total Intramedullary Hip Screw Procedures
• 8.4 Market Overview
  • 8.4.1 By Segment
  • 8.4.2 By Region
• 8.5 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 8.5.1 Total Intramedullary Hip Screw Market
  • 8.5.2 Stainless-Steel Intramedullary Hip Screw Market
  • 8.5.3 Titanium Intramedullary Hip Screw Market
• 8.6 Drivers And Limiters
  • 8.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 8.6.2 Market Limiters
• 8.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Conventional Hip Screw Market

• 9.1 Executive Summary
  • 9.1.1 Global Conventional Hip Screw Market Overview
  • 9.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 9.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 9.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 9.1.5 Regions Included
• 9.2 Introduction
• 9.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 9.3.1 Total Conventional Hip Screw Procedures
• 9.4 Market Overview
  • 9.4.1 By Segment
  • 9.4.2 By Region
• 9.5 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 9.5.1 Total Conventional Hip Screw Market
  • 9.5.2 Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market
  • 9.5.3 Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market
• 9.6 Drivers And Limiters
  • 9.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 9.6.2 Market Limiters
• 9.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Staple Fixation Market

• 10.1 Executive Summary
  • 10.1.1 Global Staple Fixation Market Overview
  • 10.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 10.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 10.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 10.1.5 Regions Included
• 10.2 Introduction
• 10.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 10.3.1 Total Staple Fixation Procedures
• 10.4 Market Overview
  • 10.4.1 By Segment
  • 10.4.2 By Region
• 10.5 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 10.5.1 Total Staple Fixation Market
  • 10.5.2 Shape Memory Staple Fixation Market
  • 10.5.3 Mechanical Compression Staple Fixation Market
• 10.6 Drivers And Limiters
  • 10.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 10.6.2 Market Limiters
• 10.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Bone Pin Market

• 11.1 Executive Summary
  • 11.1.1 Global Bone Pin Market Overview
  • 11.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 11.1.3 Regions Included
• 11.2 Introduction
• 11.3 Market Analysis And Forecast
• 11.4 Drivers And Limiters
  • 11.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 11.4.2 Market Limiters
• 11.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

External Fixation Market

• 12.1 Executive Summary
  • 12.1.1 Global External Fixation Market Overview
  • 12.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 12.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 12.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 12.1.5 Regions Included
• 12.2 Introduction
• 12.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 12.3.1 Total External Fixation Procedures
• 12.4 Market Overview
  • 12.4.1 By Segment
  • 12.4.2 By Region
• 12.5 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 12.5.1 Total External Fixation Market
  • 12.5.2 Circular External Fixation Market
  • 12.5.3 Unilateral External Fixation Market
  • 12.5.4 External Fixation By Anatomy Unit Analysis
    • 12.5.4.1 Shoulder Girdle External Fixation Units
    • 12.5.4.2 Upper Arm External Fixation Units
    • 12.5.4.3 Forearm External Fixation Units
    • 12.5.4.4 Hand And Wrist External Fixation Units
    • 12.5.4.5 Hip External Fixation Units
    • 12.5.4.6 Upper Leg External Fixation Units
    • 12.5.4.7 Knee External Fixation Units
    • 12.5.4.8 Lower Leg External Fixation Units
    • 12.5.4.9 Ankle External Fixation Units
    • 12.5.4.10 Foot And Toe External Fixation Units
• 12.6 Drivers And Limiters
  • 12.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 12.6.2 Market Limiters
• 12.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Bone Growth Stimulation Market

• 13.1 Executive Summary
  • 13.1.1 Global Bone Growth Stimulation Market Overview
  • 13.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 13.1.3 Market Segmentation
  • 13.1.4 Regions Included
• 13.2 Introduction
• 13.3 Market Overview
  • 13.3.1 By Segment
  • 13.3.2 By Region
• 13.4 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 13.4.1 Total Bone Growth Stimulation Market
  • 13.4.2 Ultrasound Bone Growth Stimulation Market
  • 13.4.3 Electrical Bone Growth Stimulation Market
• 13.5 Drivers And Limiters
  • 13.5.1 Market Drivers
  • 13.5.2 Market Limiters
• 13.6 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations