½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1806140

¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå : ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ®º°, ±â¼ú À¯Çüº°, Á¦°øº°, ÀÎÁõ À¯Çüº°, ¸ðºô¸®Æ¼º°, Àü°³ ¸ðµåº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ »ê¾÷º° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Biometrics Market by Component, Technology Type, Offering, Authentication Type, Mobility, Deployment Mode, End-User Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 181 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡´Â 377¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. 2025³â¿¡´Â 424¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇϰí, CAGR 12.90%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 782¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ : 2024³â 377¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ : 2025³â 424¾ï 4,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ : 2030³â 782¾ï ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 12.90%

Çö´ë ±â¾÷ ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ º¸¾È Çõ½Å°ú ¾÷¹« È¿À²¼ºÀÇ Ãʼ®À¸·Î ¶°¿À¸£´Â »ýüÀÎÁõ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾Ë¾Æº¾´Ï´Ù.

ÃÖ±Ù ¸î ³â µ¿¾È »ýüÀÎÁõÀº »õ·Î¿î °³³ä¿¡¼­ ´Ù¾çÇÑ »ê¾÷¿¡ °ÉÄ£ °í±Þ º¸¾È ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ÀÇ ±âº» ¿ä¼Ò·Î ºü¸£°Ô ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¶Á÷ÀÌ ±â¹Ð µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ º¸È£ÇÏ°í »ç¿ëÀÚ ¾×¼¼½º¸¦ °£¼ÒÈ­Çϱâ À§ÇØ ³ë·ÂÇϸ鼭 Áö¹®, ¾ó±¼, ȫä, À½¼º ÀÎ½Ä ±â¼úÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀÌ Á¡Á¡ ´õ ³Î¸® º¸±ÞµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ È®»êÀº ÀÎÁõÀÌ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£³ª ÅäÅ«À» ³Ñ¾î ID Áß½ÉÀÇ º¸¾È ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀ¸·Î È®ÀåµÇ´Â ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ º¸¾È ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ¹Ý¿µÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹°ú Ç¥ÁØÈ­ ´Üü´Â µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ¿ä°ÇÀ» °­È­Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±â¾÷Àº ¾×¼¼½º º¸¾ÈÀ» º¸ÀåÇÒ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ¾ö°ÝÇÑ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸ º¸È£ ÁöħÀ» ÁؼöÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» äÅÃÇϵµ·Ï Àå·ÁÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀÎ½Ä ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» Çü¼ºÇϰí, ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå Àü¹ÝÀÇ º¸¾È ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀ» ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇϸç, ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ±â¼úÀû ¹× ±ÔÁ¦Àû º¯È­¸¦ ½Äº°ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

°¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ´Â µðÁöÅÐ À§Çù°ú ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ȯ°æ ¼Ó¿¡¼­ »ýüÀÎ½Ä ±â¼úÀº ±× ¹üÀ§¿Í ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇÏ´Â º¯ÇõÀû º¯È­¸¦ ¸ÂÀÌÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇöÀç ÀΰøÁö´É°ú µö·¯´× ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©°¡ ¾ó±¼ÀÎ½Ä ¿£Áø°ú Áö¹®ÀÎ½Ä ¿£ÁøÀ» Áö¿øÇÏ¿© ¿­¾ÇÇÑ È¯°æ Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­µµ Á¤È®µµ¸¦ ³ôÀ̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ À§»ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö¸é¼­ ºñÁ¢ÃË½Ä ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀº ¿ø°Ý ¾ó±¼ ºÐ¼®°ú À½¼º ±â¹Ý ÀÎÁõÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ÃËÁøÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °³¹ßÀº »ç¿ëÀÚÀÇ ÆíÀǼºÀ» Çâ»ó½Ãų »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ½º¸¶Æ® ºôµùÀÇ ÃâÀÔ°ü¸®ºÎÅÍ °¡»ó °í°´ ¿Âº¸µùÀÇ º»ÀÎ È®ÀαîÁö ±× Àû¿ë ¹üÀ§¸¦ ³ÐÇô°¡°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÃÖ±Ù ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ °ü¼¼ Á¶Á¤ÀÌ »ýüÀÎ½Ä ±â¼ú °ø±Þ¸Á°ú »ê¾÷ ºñ¿ë ±¸Á¶¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ´©Àû È¿°ú Æò°¡

ÃÖ±Ù ¹Ì±¹ÀÌ ¼öÀÔ ÀüÀÚÁ¦Ç°¿¡ ºÎ°úÇϰí ÀÖ´Â °ü¼¼ °­È­´Â »ýüÀÎ½Ä ±â¼ú°ø±Þ¸Á°ú ºñ¿ë ±¸Á¶¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °í±Þ ¼¾¼­, Ä«¸Þ¶ó ¸ðµâ, Ư¼ö ½ºÄ³³Ê¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ¸¹Àº »ýüÀÎ½Ä ºÎǰÀº µ¿¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÀÇ Á¦Á¶ °ÅÁ¡¿¡¼­ °ø±ÞµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °ü¼¼°¡ »ó½ÂÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó °ø±Þ¾÷ü´Â ÅõÀÔ ºñ¿ë »ó½Â¿¡ Á÷¸éÇÏ¿© Á¶´Þ Àü·«À» Àç°ËÅäÇÏ°í ºñ¿ë Àý°¨ Á¶Ä¡¸¦ ÃëÇØ¾ßÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ÀϺΠ°ø±Þ¾÷üµéÀº °ü¼¼ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÙÀÌ°í °¡°Ý °æÀï·ÂÀ» À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ µ¿³²¾Æ½Ã¾Æ³ª ¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«·Î ´ëü »ý»ê±âÁö¸¦ ã¾Æ °ø±Þ¾÷ü¸¦ ´Ùº¯È­Çϱ⠽ÃÀÛÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

Áß¿äÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³¿Í ¹èÆ÷ ¹æ½ÄÀÌ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿ëµµ¿¡¼­ »ýüÀÎ½Ä Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ¾î¶»°Ô Çü¼ºÇϰí ÀÖ´ÂÁö ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

»ýüÀÎÁõ ÇöȲÀ» ´Ù°¢µµ·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¸é ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ µµÀÔ ÆÐÅϰú ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±¸¼º ¿ä¼ÒÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ º¼ ¶§, Ä«¸Þ¶ó ¸ðµâ, ±¤ÇÐ ½ºÄ³³Ê, MRI ±â¹Ý ½ºÄ³³Ê, Áö¹®, ȫä, Á¤¸Æ ¼¾¼­¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ Çϵå¿þ¾î°¡ ¿©ÀüÈ÷ ±âÃʰ¡ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Çϵå¿þ¾î °èÃþÀº ¼³Ä¡, ÅëÇÕ, Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ Áö¿ø, À¯Áöº¸¼ö µîÀÇ ¼­ºñ½º·Î º¸¿ÏµÇ¾î Àå±âÀûÀ¸·Î ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º°ú ¼º´ÉÀ» º¸ÀåÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î °èÃþÀº Á¤±³ÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Ã³¸® ¿£Áø°ú ¸ÅĪ ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀ» ½ÇÇàÇÏ°í »ç¿ëÀÚ µ¥ÀÌÅͺ£À̽º¸¦ °ü¸®ÇÏ´Â ½Äº° ¹× ÀÎÁõ ¿ëµµ¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Ç÷§Æû À§¿¡ ±¸ÃàµË´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹, EMEA, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ »ýüÀÎ½Ä ±â¼ú äÅðú ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Áö¿ªº° ¿ªÇÐÀ» »ìÆìº¾´Ï´Ù.

Áö¿ª ¿ªÇÐÀº »ýüÀÎÁõ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃ, ±ÔÁ¦ ¹× ¹èÆ÷¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ºÏ¹Ì¿Í ³²¹Ì¿¡¼­´Â ±¹Åä ¾Èº¸, ½Å¿ø È®ÀÎ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥, ±ÝÀ¶ ¼­ºñ½º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °­·ÂÇÑ ÅõÀÚ·Î ÀÎÇØ Áö¹® ¹× ¾ó±¼ ÀÎÁõÀÇ µµÀÔÀÌ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ºÏ¹Ì Á¶Á÷Àº źźÇÑ ÀÚ±Ý Á¶´Þ ¸ÞÄ¿´ÏÁò°ú ¼º¼÷ÇÑ º¥´õ »ýŰèÀÇ ÇýÅÃÀ» ´©¸®°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±¹°æ °ü¸®, Áß¿ä ÀÎÇÁ¶ó ¹× ±â¾÷ ¾×¼¼½º °ü¸® ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ ´ë±Ô¸ð ±¸ÇöÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, Áß³²¹Ì ½ÃÀåÀº ±ÝÀ¶ Æ÷¿ë°ú ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ ID ÀÎÁõÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÏ´Â ºñ¿ë È¿À²ÀûÀΠŬ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ Å×½ºÆ®º£µå·Î ºÎ»óÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

°æÀïÀû Â÷º°È­¿Í ½ÃÀå ¹ßÀü¸¦ ÁÖµµÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä »ýüÀÎ½Ä ¼Ö·ç¼Ç Á¦°ø¾÷üµéÀÇ Àü·«Àû Àü·«°ú Çõ½ÅÀÇ ±ËÀûÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä »ýüÀÎ½Ä ±â¼ú Á¦°ø¾÷üµéÀº Á¦Ç° Â÷º°È­¿Í ½ÃÀå ¸ð¸àÅÒÀ» È®º¸Çϱâ À§ÇØ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àü·«Àû ³ë·ÂÀ» ±â¿ïÀ̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¹Àº ±â¾÷µéÀÌ ÇÙ½É R&D¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ¸¦ °­È­Çϰí, ÀΰøÁö´É°ú ¿§Áö ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ±â´ÉÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ¼º´ÉÀ» ÃÖÀûÈ­Çϰí, ½Ç½Ã°£ ¹èÆ÷ ´ë±â ½Ã°£À» ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇØ ³ë·ÂÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ¼­ºñ½º Ç÷§Æû°úÀÇ Á¦ÈÞ´Â Á¡Á¡ ´õ º¸ÆíÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, º¥´õµéÀº On-Premise ¼³Ä¡ °ø°£À» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­Çϸ鼭 ±â¾÷ÀÇ Çʿ信 µû¶ó ¿øÈ°ÇÏ°Ô È®ÀåÇÒ ¼ö Àִ ȣ½ºÆÃµÈ ºÐ¼® ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

»ýüÀÎ½Ä ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ÀáÀç·ÂÀ» ÃÖ´ëÇÑ È°¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ¾÷°è ¸®´õ¿Í ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ¸¦ Áö¿øÇÏ´Â ½ÇÇà °¡´ÉÇÑ Àü·«°ú ¸ð¹ü»ç·Ê¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

»ýüÀÎ½Ä ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ÀáÀç·ÂÀ» ÃÖ´ëÇÑ È°¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¾÷°è ¸®´õµéÀº Á¦Ç° ¼³°è ¹× ¹èÆ÷¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ÇÁ¶óÀ̹ö½Ã¸¦ ÃÖ¿ì¼±½ÃÇÏ´Â Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¿ì¼±½ÃÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Ä¸Ã³ ÁöÁ¡¿¡ ¾Ïȣȭ¸¦ ÅëÇÕÇÏ°í ±¹Á¦ÀûÀÎ ÇÁ¶óÀ̹ö½Ã Ç¥ÁØÀ» ÁؼöÇÔÀ¸·Î½á »ç¿ëÀÚ ½Å·Ú¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇÏ°í ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö¸¦ °£¼ÒÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í ÇÔ²², ÁöÁ¤ÇÐÀû, °ü¼¼Àû È¥¶õ¿¡ ³ëÃâµÉ À§ÇèÀ» ÁÙÀ̰í, ÀåÄ¡ °¡¿ë¼ºÀÇ ¿¬¼Ó¼º°ú ºñ¿ë ¿¹Ãø °¡´É¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇØ ±â¾÷Àº ¸ðµâÇü Çϵå¿þ¾î Ç÷§Æû°ú ´Ù¾çÇÑ °ø±Þ¾÷ü ³×Æ®¿öÅ©¸¦ Æò°¡ÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

»ýüÀÎ½Ä ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¿ªÇÐÀ» È®½ÇÇÏ°Ô ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇØ Á¤¼ºÀû ÅëÂû·Â°ú Á¤·®Àû ¾ö°ÝÇÔÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÑ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ »ó¼¼ÇÏ°Ô ¼³¸íÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

º» Á¶»ç´Â »ýüÀÎÁõ ÇöȲ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ÅëÂû·ÂÀ» Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ È¥ÇÕ Á¶»ç ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ äÅÃÇß½À´Ï´Ù. 1Â÷ Á¶»ç´Â C·¹º§ °æ¿µÁø, Á¦Ç° °ü¸®ÀÚ, ÅëÇÕ Àü¹®°¡¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ 50¸í ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¾÷°è ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ¿ÍÀÇ ½ÉÃþ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÅëÇØ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÁúÀû ´ëÈ­¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±â¼ú µµÀÔÀÇ °úÁ¦, Àü·«Àû ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§, Áö¿ªÀû ´µ¾Ó½º µî ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ °üÁ¡À» Á¦°øÇß½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ 2Â÷ Á¶»ç·Î ±ÔÁ¦ ¹®¼­, ±â¼ú ¹é¼­, ƯÇã Ãâ¿ø, Çмú °£Ç๰ µîÀ» ¸é¹ÐÈ÷ °ËÅäÇÏ¿© °ú°Å µ¿Çâ°ú »õ·Î¿î Çõ½Å¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âÃÊÀûÀÎ ÀÌÇØ¸¦ ½ÉÈ­½ÃÄ×½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â »ýüÀÎ½Ä ±â¼ú ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ Àü·«Àû Çʼö ¿ä¼Ò¿Í ¹Ì·¡ ±Ëµµ¸¦ °­Á¶Çϱâ À§ÇØ ÇÙ½É Á¶»ç °á°ú¸¦ ÅëÇÕÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÀΰøÁö´ÉÀÇ ¹ßÀü, ±ÔÁ¦ ȯ°æÀÇ º¯È­, º¸¾È°ú »ç¿ëÀÚ ÆíÀǼº¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ä±¸·Î ÀÎÇØ »ýüÀÎÁõÀº ºü¸¥ ¼Óµµ·Î ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °¢ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò, ¼­ºñ½º, ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î °èÃþ¿¡¼­ º¥´õµéÀº °í½Å·Ú¼º Á¤ºÎ µµÀÔºÎÅÍ ¼ÒºñÀÚ ´ë»ó ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ ID ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö Á¡Á¡ ´õ ´Ù¾çÇØÁö´Â ¿ëµµ ¿ä±¸»çÇ׿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ Çõ½ÅÀ» °ÅµìÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Áö¿ªÀû ¿ªÇÐÀº Áö¿ª ±ÔÁ¦, ÀÎÇÁ¶ó ¿ª·®, ¹®È­Àû ±â´ë¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÏ´Â ¸ÂÃãÇü Á¢±Ù¹ýÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ´õ¿í °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå : ÄÄÆ÷³ÍÆ®º°

  • Çϵå¿þ¾î
    • Ä«¸Þ¶ó
    • ½ºÄ³³Ê
    • ¼¾¼­
  • ¼­ºñ½º
    • ¼³Ä¡ ¹× ÅëÇÕ ¼­ºñ½º
    • Áö¿ø ¹× À¯Áö°ü¸® ¼­ºñ½º
  • ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î
    • »ýü ÀÎ½Ä µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Ã³¸® ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î
    • »ýü ÀÎ½Ä ¹× ÀÎÁõ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î

Á¦9Àå ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå : ±â¼ú À¯Çüº°

  • ¾ó±¼ ÀνÄ
  • Áö¹® ÀνÄ
  • ¼Õ Çü»ó ÀνÄ
  • ȫä ÀνÄ
  • ¸Á¸· ½ºÄµ
  • Á¤¸Æ ÀνÄ
  • À½¼º ÀνÄ

Á¦10Àå ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå : Á¦°øº°

  • Á¢ÃË ±â¹Ý
  • ºñÁ¢ÃË
  • ÇÏÀ̺긮µå

Á¦11Àå ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå : ÀÎÁõ À¯Çüº°

  • 5¿ä¼Ò ÀÎÁõ
  • 4¿ä¼Ò ÀÎÁõ
  • ´ÜÀÏ¿ä¼Ò ÀÎÁõ
  • 3¿ä¼Ò ÀÎÁõ
  • 2¿ä¼Ò ÀÎÁõ

Á¦12Àå ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå : ¸ðºô¸®Æ¼º°

  • °íÁ¤
  • ÈÞ´ë¿ë

Á¦13Àå ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå : Àü°³ ¸ðµåº°

  • Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ±â¹Ý ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º
  • On-Premise ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º

Á¦14Àå ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ »ê¾÷º°

  • ÀºÇà, ±ÝÀ¶¼­ºñ½º ¹× º¸Çè(BFSI)
  • °¡Àü
  • ¿¡³ÊÁö ¹× À¯Æ¿¸®Æ¼
  • Á¤ºÎ ¹× ¹æÀ§
  • ÇコÄɾî
  • ½º¸¶Æ®È¨ ¹× º¸¾È
  • Åë½Å ¹× IT
  • ¿î¼Û ¹× ¹°·ù

Á¦15Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦16Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦17Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞÆ®¸¯½º ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦18Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • 3M Company
    • Accu-Time Systems, Inc.
    • Amadeus IT Group, S.A.
    • Assa Abloy AB
    • Authsignal
    • Aware, Inc.
    • BIO-key International
    • Bioenable Technologies Pvt. Limited
    • Cognitec Systems GmbH by SALTO Group
    • Daon, Inc.
    • DERMALOG Identification Systems GmbH
    • Fujitsu Limited
    • GripID
    • Hitachi, Ltd.
    • Honeywell International Inc.
    • IDEMIA Group
    • IN Groupe
    • Innovatrics, s.r.o.
    • Integrated biometrics, inc.
    • International Business Machine Corporation
    • IrisGuard Ltd
    • Leidos, Inc.
    • M2SYS, Inc.
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • NEC Corporation
    • Neurotechnology
    • NEXT Biometrics Group ASA.
    • Precise Biometrics
    • Suprema, Inc.
    • Thales Group
    • Touchless Biometric Systems AG
    • Unissey

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦20Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦21Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃÆ®

Á¦22Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦23Àå ºÎ·Ï

LSH 25.09.17

The Biometrics Market was valued at USD 37.74 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 42.44 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 12.90%, reaching USD 78.20 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 37.74 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 42.44 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 78.20 billion
CAGR (%) 12.90%

Exploring the rise of biometric authentication as a cornerstone for security innovation and operational efficiency across modern enterprise environments

In recent years, biometric authentication has rapidly evolved from an emerging concept to a foundational element in advanced security architectures across multiple industries. As organizations strive to protect sensitive data and streamline user access, the integration of fingerprint, facial, iris, and voice recognition technologies has become increasingly prevalent. This proliferation reflects a broader shift toward identity-centric security paradigms where authentication extends beyond traditional passwords and tokens. Moreover, regulators and standards bodies have amplified data protection requirements, prompting enterprises to adopt solutions that not only secure access but also ensure compliance with stringent privacy mandates.

Furthermore, the rising sophistication of machine learning algorithms and neural network models has empowered biometric systems to deliver unmatched accuracy and resilience against spoofing attempts. In parallel, hardware innovations have reduced form factors and costs, enabling deployment in both high-security government facilities and consumer electronics. Consequently, stakeholders now recognize that biometric authentication is not merely a standalone security measure but a critical enabler of digital transformation, supporting frictionless user experiences and operational efficiency.

Looking ahead, the convergence of biometric modalities with advanced analytics platforms and edge computing infrastructures promises to unlock new opportunities for real-time identity verification and continuous access assurance. Through this lens, it becomes clear that biometric solutions will play a pivotal role in defining the next generation of secure and user-friendly authentication ecosystems.

Identifying the pivotal technological and regulatory shifts reshaping biometric solutions and redefining security paradigms across global markets

Amid accelerating digital threats and evolving regulatory landscapes, biometric technologies are undergoing transformative shifts that redefine their scope and impact. Artificial intelligence and deep learning frameworks now underpin facial and fingerprint recognition engines, elevating accuracy even under challenging environmental conditions. At the same time, the migration toward contactless systems-propelled by heightened hygiene concerns-has catalyzed the adoption of remote facial analytics and voice-based authentication. These developments have not only enhanced user convenience but also expanded the range of applications, from access control in smart buildings to identity verification in virtual customer onboarding.

Moreover, interoperability standards are gaining prominence as vendors and institutions demand seamless integration across disparate security infrastructures. Open APIs and hardware-agnostic platforms are becoming industry norms, fostering ecosystem collaboration and reducing vendor lock-in. In parallel, data privacy frameworks such as GDPR and CCPA are exerting pressure on solution providers to embed privacy-by-design principles, ensuring that biometric templates remain encrypted and user consent is rigorously managed. Transitioning from siloed deployments to unified identity management architectures, organizations are better positioned to maintain audit trails, enforce dynamic policies, and respond swiftly to compliance inquiries.

Taken together, these shifts underscore a maturing market where performance, usability, and governance coalesce to create resilient, scalable biometric ecosystems. As enterprises embrace these trends, they lay the groundwork for next-generation security solutions that balance robust protection with seamless user experiences.

Assessing the cumulative effects of recent United States tariff adjustments on biometric technology supply chains and industry cost structures

The recent wave of tariff enhancements imposed by the United States on imported electronic goods has exerted a notable influence on biometric technology supply chains and cost architectures. Many biometric components, including advanced sensors, camera modules, and specialized scanners, originate from manufacturing hubs in East Asia. As tariff duties rise, vendors face elevated input costs, compelling them to reassess sourcing strategies and engage in cost mitigation exercises. In turn, some providers have begun diversifying their supplier base, exploring alternative manufacturing locations in Southeast Asia and Latin America to alleviate tariff exposure and maintain price competitiveness.

Meanwhile, domestic assemblers and integrators are confronted with recalibrated budgets, prompting renegotiation of contracts and the revaluation of total cost of ownership. The increased input expenses have also driven consolidation among smaller hardware specialists that lack the leverage to absorb incremental duties. However, this dynamic has created openings for larger incumbents with global manufacturing footprints to strengthen their market positions. Amid these adjustments, service providers are exploring hybrid deployment models that emphasize cloud-native architectures, shifting some hardware burden away from on-premise installations and reducing tariff-sensitive equipment requirements.

Ultimately, the tariff environment underscores the importance of supply chain resilience and strategic sourcing. Industry participants that proactively engage in supplier diversification, nearshoring initiatives, and dynamic pricing strategies are best positioned to navigate these headwinds and preserve margin stability in a period of geopolitical uncertainty.

Uncovering critical segmentation insights to illuminate how component architecture and deployment modalities shape biometrics adoption in diverse applications

The biometric authentication landscape can be dissected along multiple dimensions to reveal nuanced adoption patterns and growth drivers. From a component perspective, hardware remains foundational, encompassing camera modules, optical and MRI-based scanners, and an array of fingerprint, iris, and vein sensors. This hardware layer is complemented by services such as installation, integration, ongoing support, and maintenance, which ensure system reliability and performance over time. Software layers build upon these platforms with sophisticated data processing engines and identification and authentication applications that execute matching algorithms and manage user databases.

Beyond component archetypes, a spectrum of technology types diversifies solution portfolios. Facial recognition systems leverage advanced image analytics, while fingerprint and hand geometry platforms address access scenarios requiring physical interaction. Iris scanning and retina-based approaches cater to high-security environments with stringent accuracy requirements, and vein recognition and voice biometrics introduce additional modalities tailored for specific use cases. Delivery models further differentiate offerings, spanning pure contact-based systems to entirely touchless configurations and hybrid implementations that blend modalities to balance user experience and security.

Authentication complexity ranges from single-factor implementations for low-risk applications to multi-factor schemes demanding two, three, four, or even five independent credentials for critical infrastructure access. Mobility considerations influence deployments, with fixed installations anchoring perimeter security and portable devices empowering field operations. Cloud-native services and on-premise deployments each offer distinct advantages in scalability, latency, and data sovereignty, while end-user verticals-from banking and consumer electronics through government, healthcare, and transportation-drive tailored feature sets that align with industry-specific requirements.

Examining region-specific dynamics that influence biometric technologies adoption and regulatory frameworks across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific markets

Regional dynamics play a critical role in shaping the adoption, regulation, and deployment of biometric authentication systems. In the Americas, strong investment in homeland security, identity programs, and financial services has accelerated fingerprint and facial recognition rollouts. North American organizations, in particular, benefit from robust funding mechanisms and a mature vendor ecosystem, enabling large-scale implementations in border control, critical infrastructure, and enterprise access management. Meanwhile, Latin American markets are emerging as test beds for cost-effective, cloud-driven solutions targeting financial inclusion and mobile identity verification.

Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, data protection regulations such as GDPR have set stringent benchmarks for privacy and consent, influencing solution design and deployment strategies. This landscape has stimulated demand for privacy-preserving biometric platforms that incorporate template anonymization and decentralized data storage. In the Middle East, national identity initiatives and large-scale smart city projects are creating substantial procurement pipelines, while African nations are exploring biometric voting systems and healthcare patient identification programs as catalysts for social impact.

In the Asia-Pacific region, government-led identity programs in China and India continue to drive massive enrollments, underpinning opportunities in mobile authentication and border security. Southeast Asian economies are leveraging biometric-enabled payment systems and retail applications to enhance customer experiences, while Australia and Japan focus on high-assurance solutions for critical infrastructure and defense. Collectively, these regional variances underscore the need for vendors and end users to adopt flexible strategies that address local regulatory frameworks, infrastructure maturity levels, and cultural preferences.

Analyzing strategic maneuvers and innovation trajectories of leading biometric solution providers driving competitive differentiation and market evolution

Leading biometric technology providers are actively pursuing a range of strategic initiatives to differentiate their offerings and capture market momentum. Many organizations are elevating their investment in core research and development, integrating artificial intelligence with edge computing capabilities to optimize performance and reduce latency in real-time deployments. Partnerships with cloud service platforms are becoming more common, enabling vendors to deliver hosted analytics solutions that scale seamlessly with enterprise needs while minimizing on-premise footprint.

Simultaneously, mergers and acquisitions remain a key lever for broadening product catalogs and accelerating entry into adjacent markets. By acquiring niche specialists in areas such as vein recognition or behavioral biometrics, established players can swiftly augment their technological capabilities and penetrate new verticals. In parallel, alliances with systems integrators and managed service providers are expanding reach into end-user segments that demand turnkey security ecosystems and continuous lifecycle support.

Several providers are also recalibrating their commercial models, transitioning from perpetual licensing to subscription-based structures that align budgetary cycles with consumption patterns. This shift enables clients to adopt modular solutions incrementally, reducing upfront capital expenditures and facilitating iterative deployments. Taken together, these strategic maneuvers underscore an industry in motion, where innovation, collaboration, and commercial agility converge to set the pace for next-generation biometric ecosystems.

Crafting actionable strategies and best practices to empower industry leaders and stakeholders in harnessing the full potential of biometric solutions

To harness the full potential of biometric solutions, industry leaders should prioritize a privacy-first approach in product design and deployment. Embedding encryption at the data capture point and adhering to international privacy standards will foster user trust and streamline regulatory compliance. In parallel, organizations should evaluate modular hardware platforms and diversified supplier networks to mitigate exposure to geopolitical and tariff-related disruptions, ensuring continuity in device availability and cost predictability.

Collaboration with ecosystem partners, including cloud providers, systems integrators, and cybersecurity experts, can accelerate time to value and enable comprehensive end-to-end solutions. Leaders ought to pilot hybrid deployment models that blend on-premise and cloud-hosted services, balancing latency requirements with scalability demands. Investing in user experience design-through intuitive interfaces and frictionless enrollment processes-will drive high enrollment rates and reduce support overhead.

Furthermore, proactive engagement with standards bodies and industry consortia can influence emerging interoperability frameworks and certification programs, positioning organizations at the forefront of policy evolution. By aligning technology roadmaps with sector-specific use cases in banking, healthcare, and government, decision-makers can unlock new growth opportunities and solidify their reputation as trusted identity partners. Ultimately, embracing these strategies will enable stakeholders to navigate complex market dynamics and secure sustainable competitive advantages.

Detailing the comprehensive research framework integrating qualitative insights and quantitative rigor to ensure robust analysis of biometric market dynamics

This study employs a rigorous mixed-methods research framework to deliver comprehensive insights into the biometric authentication landscape. Primary research was conducted through in-depth interviews with over fifty industry stakeholders, including C-level executives, product managers, and integration specialists. These qualitative dialogues provided nuanced perspectives on technology adoption challenges, strategic priorities, and regional nuances. Concurrently, secondary research encompassed detailed reviews of regulatory documents, technical white papers, patent filings, and academic publications to establish a foundational understanding of historical trends and emerging innovations.

Quantitative rigor was achieved by aggregating deployment data across multiple verticals and geographies, enabling robust cross-comparisons that highlight performance benchmarks and adoption velocities. Data triangulation techniques were applied to validate findings, combining manufacturer shipment records, end-user surveys, and publicly available procurement data. Attention was given to ensuring sample representativeness across component types, technology modalities, and deployment configurations, thereby capturing the full spectrum of market diversity.

Throughout the research process, peer review checkpoints and methodological audits were integrated to uphold analytical integrity. This comprehensive approach not only enhances the credibility of the insights but also equips decision-makers with a clear, evidence-based roadmap for navigating opportunities and risks in the evolving biometric domain.

Synthesizing core findings to underscore strategic imperatives and future trajectories within the evolving biometric technology landscape

The biometric authentication landscape continues to evolve at a rapid pace, driven by advances in artificial intelligence, shifting regulatory environments, and the imperative for both security and user convenience. Across components, services, and software layers, vendors are innovating to meet increasingly diverse application requirements, from high-assurance government deployments to consumer-facing mobile identity solutions. Regional dynamics further underscore the need for tailored approaches that address local regulations, infrastructure capabilities, and cultural expectations.

Tariff-induced supply chain pressures have underscored the importance of flexible sourcing strategies and hybrid deployment models that can absorb cost shocks while maintaining service quality. Meanwhile, segmentation analysis highlights the significance of delivering multimodal, multi-factor authentication options that can be configured to match risk levels and user profiles. Leading organizations are differentiating through strategic partnerships, M&A activity, and subscription-based commercial frameworks that align with evolving procurement cycles.

As the industry matures, stakeholders who embrace privacy-first design, participate in standards development, and invest in intuitive user experiences will be best positioned to capture new growth opportunities. By synthesizing these strategic imperatives and focusing on resilient, scalable architectures, decision-makers can navigate the complex biometric landscape and unlock sustainable competitive advantage in a world where identity is paramount.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Adoption of palm vein biometric sensors for contactless identity verification in banking and fintech industries
  • 5.2. Deployment of facial recognition with liveness detection algorithms to mitigate deepfake based fraud risks in border control settings
  • 5.3. Implementation of behavioral biometrics leveraging continuous user gait and keystroke analysis for real time fraud prevention in financial services
  • 5.4. Advancement of multimodal biometric authentication combining fingerprint, iris, and voice recognition to enhance enterprise access security
  • 5.5. Emergence of decentralized blockchain based biometric identity platforms for secure user data ownership and interoperable cross platform authentication
  • 5.6. Growth of voice biometric solutions integrated with NLP engines for seamless customer authentication and fraud detection in contact centers

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Biometrics Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Hardware
    • 8.2.1. Camera
    • 8.2.2. Scanner
    • 8.2.3. Sensors
  • 8.3. Services
    • 8.3.1. Installation & Integration Services
    • 8.3.2. Support & Maintenance Services
  • 8.4. Software
    • 8.4.1. Biometric Data Processing Software
    • 8.4.2. Biometric Identification & Authentication Software

9. Biometrics Market, by Technology Type

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Facial Recognition
  • 9.3. Fingerprint Recognition
  • 9.4. Hand Geometry Recognition
  • 9.5. Iris Recognition
  • 9.6. Retina scanning
  • 9.7. Vein Recognition
  • 9.8. Voice Recognition

10. Biometrics Market, by Offering

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Contact-Based
  • 10.3. Contact-less
  • 10.4. Hybrid

11. Biometrics Market, by Authentication Type

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Five Factor
  • 11.3. Four Factor
  • 11.4. Single Factor
  • 11.5. Three Factor
  • 11.6. Two Factor

12. Biometrics Market, by Mobility

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Fixed
  • 12.3. Portable

13. Biometrics Market, by Deployment Mode

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Cloud-based Biometrics
  • 13.3. On-premise Biometrics

14. Biometrics Market, by End-User Industry

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. Banking, Financial Services, & Insurance
  • 14.3. Consumer Electronics
  • 14.4. Energy & Utilities
  • 14.5. Government & Defense
  • 14.6. Healthcare
  • 14.7. Smart Homes & Security
  • 14.8. Telecom & IT
  • 14.9. Transportation & Logistics

15. Americas Biometrics Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. United States
  • 15.3. Canada
  • 15.4. Mexico
  • 15.5. Brazil
  • 15.6. Argentina

16. Europe, Middle East & Africa Biometrics Market

  • 16.1. Introduction
  • 16.2. United Kingdom
  • 16.3. Germany
  • 16.4. France
  • 16.5. Russia
  • 16.6. Italy
  • 16.7. Spain
  • 16.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 16.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 16.10. South Africa
  • 16.11. Denmark
  • 16.12. Netherlands
  • 16.13. Qatar
  • 16.14. Finland
  • 16.15. Sweden
  • 16.16. Nigeria
  • 16.17. Egypt
  • 16.18. Turkey
  • 16.19. Israel
  • 16.20. Norway
  • 16.21. Poland
  • 16.22. Switzerland

17. Asia-Pacific Biometrics Market

  • 17.1. Introduction
  • 17.2. China
  • 17.3. India
  • 17.4. Japan
  • 17.5. Australia
  • 17.6. South Korea
  • 17.7. Indonesia
  • 17.8. Thailand
  • 17.9. Philippines
  • 17.10. Malaysia
  • 17.11. Singapore
  • 17.12. Vietnam
  • 17.13. Taiwan

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 18.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 18.3.1. 3M Company
    • 18.3.2. Accu-Time Systems, Inc.
    • 18.3.3. Amadeus IT Group, S.A.
    • 18.3.4. Assa Abloy AB
    • 18.3.5. Authsignal
    • 18.3.6. Aware, Inc.
    • 18.3.7. BIO-key International
    • 18.3.8. Bioenable Technologies Pvt. Limited
    • 18.3.9. Cognitec Systems GmbH by SALTO Group
    • 18.3.10. Daon, Inc.
    • 18.3.11. DERMALOG Identification Systems GmbH
    • 18.3.12. Fujitsu Limited
    • 18.3.13. GripID
    • 18.3.14. Hitachi, Ltd.
    • 18.3.15. Honeywell International Inc.
    • 18.3.16. IDEMIA Group
    • 18.3.17. IN Groupe
    • 18.3.18. Innovatrics, s.r.o.
    • 18.3.19. Integrated biometrics, inc.
    • 18.3.20. International Business Machine Corporation
    • 18.3.21. IrisGuard Ltd
    • 18.3.22. Leidos, Inc.
    • 18.3.23. M2SYS, Inc.
    • 18.3.24. Microsoft Corporation
    • 18.3.25. NEC Corporation
    • 18.3.26. Neurotechnology
    • 18.3.27. NEXT Biometrics Group ASA.
    • 18.3.28. Precise Biometrics
    • 18.3.29. Suprema, Inc.
    • 18.3.30. Thales Group
    • 18.3.31. Touchless Biometric Systems AG
    • 18.3.32. Unissey

19. ResearchAI

20. ResearchStatistics

21. ResearchContacts

22. ResearchArticles

23. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦