시장보고서
상품코드
1827998

동물 바이오테크놀러지 시장 : 제품 유형, 기술, 용도, 최종사용자별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

Animal Biotechnology Market by Product Type, Technology, Application, End-User - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 187 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

동물 바이오테크놀러지 시장은 2032년까지 CAGR 8.71%로 605억 6,000만 달러로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준연도 2024 310억 4,000만 달러
추정연도 2025 338억 1,000만 달러
예측연도 2032 605억 6,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 8.71%

과학적 혁신, 규제 진화, 공급망 강건성을 경영 의사결정의 핵심으로 삼는 동물생명공학의 전략적 방향성

동물 생명공학은 분자 툴, 제조 플랫폼, 규제 프레임워크의 발전이 동물 건강, 영양, R&D 솔루션의 개발 및 배포 방식을 재정의하는 변곡점에 서 있습니다. 이 산업은 현재 재조합 단백질, 백신 혁신, 정밀 사료첨가제, 가축 생산성뿐만 아니라 생물의학 연구 및 중개과학을 지원하는 진단학에 이르기까지 다양한 분야에 걸쳐 있습니다. 투자자, 정책 입안자, 기업 리더들은 탄력적인 밸류체인, 개발 기간 단축, 동물 복지를 강화하면서 환경 발자국을 줄이는 기술에 점점 더 많은 관심을 기울이고 있습니다.

유전자 편집, 고처리량 시퀀싱, 첨단 세포배양 등의 개발 능력으로 새로운 유형의 생물제제 및 플랫폼 기술이 가능해지고 있으며, 그 다운스트림에 미치는 영향은 치료제 개발, 진단 처리량, 농장 단위의 도입까지 확대될 것으로 보입니다. 동시에 사회적 감시의 강화, 무역 정책의 진화, 조달 관행의 변화로 인해 기업은 조달 전략과 규제에 대한 대비를 재검토해야 합니다. 이 소개서는 동물생명공학 생태계 전반에 걸쳐 과학적 기회를 지속가능한 경쟁 우위로 전환하기 위해 경영진이 우선순위를 두어야 할 기술, 정책, 공급망, 상업적 전략과 같은 중요한 지렛대를 정리했습니다.

기술적 변곡점, 진화하는 상업화 모델, 규제에 대한 적응이 동물 생명공학의 경쟁 역학을 재구성하는 방법

플랫폼 기술의 성숙과 상업화 경로의 진화에 힘입어 동물생명공학의 정세는 변혁적인 변화를 맞이하고 있습니다. 유전자 편집 툴와 유전자 도입 기법은 개념 증명 단계에서 형질 공학 및 백신 항원 설계를 가속화하는 이용 사례로 전환되고 있습니다. 동시에 조류, 곤충, 포유류 플랫폼을 포함한 세포배양 시스템의 개선으로 레거시 프로세스에 대한 의존도를 줄이고, 보다 확장 가능하고 비용 효율적인 생물제제 제조가 가능해졌습니다. 차세대 시퀀싱 및 PCR 워크플로우의 개선으로 분석 해상도가 향상되고 결과 도출 시간이 단축되고 있습니다.

연구개발 및 제조 위탁 기관은 엔드 투 엔드 서비스를 제공하기 위해 역량을 확장하고 있으며, 실험실과 업계 관계자의 파트너십은 위험을 공유하고 배포를 가속화하기 위해 표준이 되고 있습니다. 규제 당국은 보다 반복적이고 과학적인 근거에 기반한 대화를 통해 새로운 방식에 적응하고 있으며, 지속가능성에 대한 압박으로 인해 기업은 저배출 제조 발자국과 대체 투입물을 추구하고 있습니다. 이러한 변화로 인해 경쟁 역학이 변화하고 있으며, 플랫폼 기술, 유연한 규제 전략, 탄력적인 공급 모델을 통합하여 동물 생명공학의 새로운 기회를 포착할 수 있는 조직이 새로운 경로를 창출하고 있습니다.

2025년 관세 전환이 동물생명공학 밸류체인 전반공급망, 조달 전략, 운영 리스크 프레임워크를 어떻게 재조정하고 있는지 이해

미국의 2025년 관세 정책 개발은 동물 생명공학 분야공급망 경제성, 조달 전략, 경영 계획에 누적 영향을 미치고 있습니다. 시약, 실험기구, 특수 부품에 대한 수입관세 인상으로 육지 투입비용이 증가하여 제조업체와 서비스 프로바이더의 이윤을 압박하고 있습니다. 기업은 공급업체 다변화를 가속화하고, 미국 외 공급업체와 장기 계약을 체결하고, 관세 변동 위험을 줄이기 위해 니어쇼어링과 리쇼어링 옵션을 모색하는 등 대응하고 있습니다. 이러한 변화는 조달 주기, 재고 관리, 자본 배분 결정 등 다운스트림에 영향을 미칩니다.

관세로 인한 재편은 직접적인 비용 압박뿐만 아니라 전략적 파트너십과 연구개발 협력에도 영향을 미칩니다. 지금까지 초기 단계의 연구 재료를 국경을 넘나드는 거래에 의존하던 조직은 국내 공급업체로 전환하거나, 지역적으로 다양한 연구 파트너를 포함한 공동 연구 네트워크를 확대할 수 있습니다. 규제 준수와 세관 절차가 더욱 복잡해지고, 생물제제 및 진단 키트의 국경 간 운송에 대한 관리 오버헤드가 증가하고 있습니다. 그 결과, 기업은 연속성을 유지하기 위해 공급망 가시화 툴와 이중 조달 전략에 투자하고 있습니다. 동시에, 관세 환경은 일부 이해관계자들이 현지 생산 능력에 대한 투자를 가속화하도록 촉구하고 있습니다. 이는 관세에 대한 노출을 줄일 수 있지만, 노동력 확보, 자본집약도, 규제당국의 승인에 대해 신중하게 고려해야 합니다. 전반적으로 관세 상황은 리스크 프레임워크와 운영 모델의 재조정을 촉진하고, 당면한 전략적 계획 수립에 영향을 미칠 것으로 보입니다.

상세한 세분화 분석을 통해 제품, 기술, 애플리케이션, 최종사용자의 차이, 개발 우선순위, 시장 개발 모델, 투자 초점을 결정하는 방법을 밝힙니다.

세분화의 역학은 제품 유형, 기술, 용도, 최종사용자별로 가치 창출을 위한 명확한 경로와 사업 운영의 우선순위를 명확히 합니다. 제품 유형별로 보면 이 부문은 재조합 단백질과 백신에 걸쳐 있습니다. 재조합 단백질에는 항체, 효소, 성장호르몬이 포함되며, 효소 서브셋에는 리파아제, 피타제, 프로테아제가 포함되며, 백신에는 DNA 백신, 불활화 백신, 약독성 생백신, 아단위 백신이 포함됩니다. 항체는 특이성과 생산 규모를 우선시하고, 효소는 내열성과 사료에 대한 통합을 중시하며, 백신은 콜드체인 및 규제 접근 방식에 부합하는 방식을 요구합니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 개요

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 동물 바이오테크놀러지 시장 : 제품 유형별

  • 재조합 단백질
    • 항체
    • 효소
      • 리파아제
      • 피타아제
      • 프로테아제
    • 성장호르몬
  • 백신
    • DNA 백신
    • 불활화 백신
    • 생약독화 백신
    • 서브유닛 백신

제9장 동물 바이오테크놀러지 시장 : 기술별

  • 세포배양
    • 조류 세포배양
    • 곤충 세포배양
    • 포유류 세포배양
  • 유전자 공학
    • 유전자 편집
    • 유전자 합성
    • 유전자변형 기술
  • PCR과 DNA 시퀀싱
    • 차세대 시퀀싱
    • PCR 키트
    • 생어 시퀀스

제10장 동물 바이오테크놀러지 시장 : 용도별

  • 진단
    • ELISA 키트
    • 측방유동 어세이
    • PCR 검사
  • Drug Discovery
    • 리드 최적화
    • 전임상 시험
    • 타겟 식별
  • 사료첨가제
    • 탄수화물 분해 효소
    • 피타아제
    • 프로테아제

제11장 동물 바이오테크놀러지 시장 : 최종사용자별

  • 동물농장
  • 계약 조사기관
  • 제약회사
  • 조사실

제12장 동물 바이오테크놀러지 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제13장 동물 바이오테크놀러지 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제14장 동물 바이오테크놀러지 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제15장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • Zoetis Inc.
    • Merck & Co., Inc.
    • Elanco Animal Health Incorporated
    • Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
    • Ceva Sante Animale S.A.
    • Dechra Pharmaceuticals PLC
    • Vetoquinol S.A.
    • Phibro Animal Health Corporation
    • Virbac S.A.
    • IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
KSA 25.10.13

The Animal Biotechnology Market is projected to grow by USD 60.56 billion at a CAGR of 8.71% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 31.04 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 33.81 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 60.56 billion
CAGR (%) 8.71%

A strategic orientation to animal biotechnology that frames scientific innovation, regulatory evolution, and supply chain resilience as core drivers of executive decision making

Animal biotechnology stands at an inflection point where advances in molecular tools, manufacturing platforms, and regulatory frameworks converge to redefine how animal health, nutrition, and research solutions are developed and deployed. The industry now spans recombinant proteins, vaccine innovation, precision feed additives, and diagnostics that support not only livestock productivity but also biomedical research and translational science. Investors, policy makers, and corporate leaders are increasingly focused on resilient value chains, accelerated development timelines, and technologies that reduce environmental footprint while enhancing animal welfare.

Emergent capabilities in gene editing, high-throughput sequencing, and advanced cell culture are enabling new classes of biologics and platform technologies whose downstream effects will extend across therapeutic development, diagnostic throughput, and farm-level adoption. At the same time, intensifying public scrutiny, evolving trade policies, and shifting procurement practices are prompting organizations to reassess sourcing strategies and regulatory readiness. This introduction frames the critical levers-technology, policy, supply chain, and commercial strategy-that executives must prioritize to convert scientific opportunity into sustainable competitive advantage across the animal biotechnology ecosystem.

How technological inflection points, evolving commercialization models, and regulatory adaptation are reshaping competitive dynamics in animal biotechnology

The landscape of animal biotechnology is undergoing transformative shifts driven by the maturation of platform technologies and evolving commercialization pathways. Gene editing tools and transgenic methodologies have moved from proof-of-concept stages to operational use cases that accelerate trait engineering and vaccine antigen design. Concurrently, improvements in cell culture systems-including avian, insect, and mammalian platforms-are enabling more scalable and cost-efficient biologics manufacturing that reduces dependence on legacy processes. These technological inflections are also complemented by advances in sequencing and diagnostics, where next-generation sequencing and improved PCR workflows are increasing analytic resolution and shortening time-to-result horizons.

Commercial models are also shifting: contract development and manufacturing organizations are expanding capabilities to offer end-to-end services, while partnerships between research laboratories and industry actors are becoming the norm to share risk and speed deployment. Regulatory authorities are adapting to new modalities with more iterative, science-based dialogues, while sustainability pressures are pushing firms to seek lower-emissions manufacturing footprints and alternative inputs. Together, these shifts are altering competitive dynamics and creating new pathways for organizations that can integrate platform technologies, agile regulatory strategies, and resilient supply models to capture emerging opportunities in animal biotechnology.

Understanding how 2025 tariff shifts are recalibrating supply chains, sourcing strategies, and operational risk frameworks across the animal biotechnology value chain

Tariff policy developments in the United States in 2025 are exerting cumulative effects on supply chain economics, sourcing strategies, and operational planning within the animal biotechnology sector. Increased import duties on reagents, laboratory equipment, and specialized components raise landed input costs and compress margins for manufacturers and service providers. Companies are responding by accelerating supplier diversification, securing longer-term contracts with non-U.S. vendors, and exploring near-shoring or reshoring options to mitigate exposure to tariff volatility. These changes have downstream implications for procurement cycles, inventory management, and capital allocation decisions.

Beyond immediate cost pressures, tariff-driven realignments influence strategic partnerships and R&D collaborations. Organizations that previously relied on cross-border exchanges for early-stage research materials may pivot toward domestic suppliers or broaden collaborative networks to include geographically diversified research partners. Regulatory compliance and customs processes have become more complex, increasing administrative overhead for cross-border shipments of biologics and diagnostic kits. As a result, firms are investing in supply chain visibility tools and dual-sourcing strategies to maintain continuity. In parallel, the tariff environment is prompting some stakeholders to accelerate investments in local manufacturing capacity, which can reduce tariff exposure but requires careful consideration of workforce availability, capital intensity, and regulatory approvals. Overall, the tariff landscape is driving a recalibration of risk frameworks and operational models that will influence strategic planning for the foreseeable future.

Detailed segmentation analysis revealing how product, technology, application, and end-user distinctions determine development priorities, go-to-market models, and investment focus

Segmentation dynamics reveal distinct pathways to value and operational priorities across product types, technologies, applications, and end users. Based on product type, the sector spans recombinant proteins and vaccines; recombinant proteins include antibodies, enzymes, and growth hormones, and the enzymes subset comprises lipases, phytases, and proteases, while vaccines encompass DNA vaccines, inactivated vaccines, live attenuated vaccines, and subunit vaccines. This diversity requires differentiated development strategies: antibodies prioritize specificity and manufacturing scale, enzymes emphasize thermostability and feed integration, and vaccine modalities demand tailored cold-chain and regulatory approaches.

Based on technology, the market includes cell culture, genetic engineering, and PCR and DNA sequencing; cell culture further breaks down into avian, insect, and mammalian cell culture, genetic engineering covers gene editing, gene synthesis, and transgenic technology, while PCR and DNA sequencing span next-generation sequencing, PCR kits, and Sanger sequencing. These technological axes shape capital intensity, talent requirements, and regulatory interfaces. Based on application, the landscape includes diagnostics, drug discovery, and feed additives; diagnostics subdivide into ELISA kits, lateral flow assays, and PCR-based tests, drug discovery covers lead optimization, preclinical testing, and target identification, and feed additives include carbohydrases, phytases, and proteases. Application-driven segmentation highlights where value accrues: diagnostics deliver recurrent consumable demand, drug discovery requires extended R&D investment, and feed additives emphasize agricultural integration. Based on end-user, demand is sourced from animal farms, contract research organizations, pharmaceutical companies, and research laboratories. Each end-user presents unique procurement patterns and service-level expectations, requiring vendors to align product design, regulatory support, and commercial models to end-user priorities and operational constraints.

Comparative regional intelligence demonstrating how Americas, Europe Middle East and Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics influence regulatory strategy, manufacturing, and adoption trajectories

Regional dynamics shape opportunity sets, regulatory contours, and adoption trajectories across the Americas, Europe Middle East and Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, established research infrastructure and significant private investment foster rapid adoption of novel biologics and diagnostic platforms, while logistical hubs and advanced manufacturing clusters support contract development and manufacturing activity. North American regulatory dialogues increasingly emphasize harmonization and expedited pathways for innovative modalities, creating an environment where scale-up and commercial launch can proceed with greater predictability when regulatory strategies are proactively managed.

In Europe, the Middle East and Africa, regulatory diversity and complex cross-border trade arrangements require granular regulatory intelligence and adaptable supply chains. The region combines mature scientific centers with markets that are still developing capacity for advanced biologics, making partnerships and public-private initiatives particularly valuable. Policy priorities around animal welfare and sustainability often shape procurement preferences in this region. In the Asia-Pacific, a combination of rapid market growth, expanding domestic manufacturing capability, and increasing public research funding is accelerating adoption of vaccines, feed additives, and diagnostics. Local manufacturers and research institutions are scaling capabilities in cell culture and genetic engineering, and cross-border collaborations are common as firms leverage cost-competitive production while accessing large regional demand pools. Across all regions, firms that craft localized regulatory strategies and supply chain architectures will gain an edge in commercial execution.

How corporate strategies combining vertical integration, platform differentiation, and talent prioritization are determining competitive positioning in animal biotechnology

Company strategies in animal biotechnology are converging on several repeatable patterns that signal winners and pressure points across the competitive landscape. Leading actors are pursuing vertical integration and strategic partnerships to secure critical inputs, reduce time-to-market, and expand value-added service offerings. Contract development and manufacturing organizations are investing in platform flexibility to accommodate both recombinant proteins and vaccine modalities, enabling them to capture a broader share of outsourced development and production demand. At the same time, specialist technology providers are differentiating through proprietary cell lines, optimized fermentation processes, or unique sequencing and diagnostic chemistries that deliver performance advantages for specific end-users.

Investment profiles show a balance between R&D intensity for next-generation modalities and operational investments in scale, quality systems, and regulatory affairs. Talent acquisition and retention have emerged as key competitive factors, with companies prioritizing cross-disciplinary teams that combine molecular biology expertise with regulatory, manufacturing, and commercialization experience. Strategic M&A and licensing transactions are being used to access niche technologies or expand geographic reach, while alliances between academic institutions and commercial developers accelerate translational milestones. Overall, organizations that combine platform innovation with robust regulatory roadmaps and flexible manufacturing partnerships are best positioned to capture emerging opportunities across animal health, feed solutions, and diagnostic applications.

Actionable strategies for leaders to fortify supply chains, modularize manufacturing, engage regulators proactively, and accelerate platform-based innovation for commercial scalability

Industry leaders should adopt a suite of tangible actions to convert scientific capability into durable commercial advantage. First, diversify procurement and logistics by qualifying multiple suppliers across geographies, establishing strategic inventory buffers for critical reagents, and investing in supply chain visibility systems to anticipate disruptions. Second, prioritize modular manufacturing investments that allow rapid reconfiguration between recombinant proteins and vaccine production, reducing changeover time and maximizing capacity utilization. Third, commit to proactive regulatory engagement by participating in jurisdictional working groups, submitting pilot data packages early, and designing clinical and safety programs that align with evolving agency expectations.

Fourth, accelerate platform-based innovation by standardizing analytical methods, sharing validated cell lines or assay formats where permissible, and pursuing partnerships that co-fund translational milestones. Fifth, enhance commercial adoption through end-user education programs that demonstrate product efficacy, ease of use, and return on operational metrics for animal farms and research laboratories. Sixth, manage talent risk through targeted recruitment, professional development, and cross-functional governance that ensures continuity across R&D, manufacturing, and regulatory teams. Implementing these recommendations will enable organizations to mitigate near-term policy headwinds, optimize capital deployment, and build scalable operations aligned with long-term scientific and commercial objectives.

A multi-method research framework combining expert interviews, literature synthesis, patent and regulatory review, and data triangulation to ensure robust and actionable insights

This analysis is based on a multi-method research approach that integrates primary expert engagement, secondary literature synthesis, and structured data triangulation. Primary inputs included confidential interviews with senior R&D leaders, manufacturing executives, and regulatory specialists across academia, industry, and contract service providers; these interviews informed scenario development and validated emergent trends. Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed literature, patent filings, regulatory guidance documents, and technical white papers to establish the scientific and regulatory context for technology adoption and manufacturing evolution.

Quantitative and qualitative findings were cross-checked through triangulation to reconcile divergent perspectives and to highlight consensus areas. The research process also included value-chain mapping exercises to identify critical bottlenecks in sourcing, production, and distribution, and a review of public procurement and policy developments to assess potential commercial implications. Quality assurance measures included independent peer review by domain experts, source transparency protocols, and iterative feedback loops with subject-matter specialists to ensure robustness and relevance of conclusions.

Executive conclusion summarizing how integrated scientific innovation, regulatory agility, and operational resilience will determine long-term success within animal biotechnology

In conclusion, animal biotechnology is evolving through an interplay of scientific innovation, supply chain realignment, and regulatory adaptation that together create both opportunity and complexity for market participants. Technological advances in cell culture, genetic engineering, and sequencing are unlocking new product classes and efficiencies, while tariff dynamics and regional policy shifts are forcing organizations to reassess sourcing, manufacturing, and partnership strategies. Successful players will be those that translate platform capabilities into reproducible manufacturing processes, maintain regulatory agility, and construct resilient supply networks that mitigate geopolitical and logistical risks.

Looking ahead, the ability to synthesize scientific rigor with operational excellence will determine which organizations capture sustained value. Firms that invest in modular manufacturing, cultivate diversified supplier ecosystems, and engage proactively with regulators will be better positioned to convert R&D breakthroughs into scalable products and services. The path forward requires a balance of innovation, disciplined execution, and strategic partnerships that together will drive long-term growth and impact across animal health, nutrition, and research domains.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Emergence of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to enhance disease resistance in poultry farming operations
  • 5.2. Commercial scale adoption of cell cultured meat production to reduce environmental impact and meet consumer demand
  • 5.3. Integration of artificial intelligence and genomics data for predictive health management in dairy cattle herds
  • 5.4. Advances in microbiome modulation therapies to improve feed efficiency and disease resilience in swine
  • 5.5. Deployment of recombinant vaccine platforms to control emerging zoonotic diseases in livestock industries

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Animal Biotechnology Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Recombinant Proteins
    • 8.1.1. Antibodies
    • 8.1.2. Enzymes
      • 8.1.2.1. Lipases
      • 8.1.2.2. Phytases
      • 8.1.2.3. Proteases
    • 8.1.3. Growth Hormones
  • 8.2. Vaccines
    • 8.2.1. DNA Vaccines
    • 8.2.2. Inactivated Vaccines
    • 8.2.3. Live Attenuated Vaccines
    • 8.2.4. Subunit Vaccines

9. Animal Biotechnology Market, by Technology

  • 9.1. Cell Culture
    • 9.1.1. Avian Cell Culture
    • 9.1.2. Insect Cell Culture
    • 9.1.3. Mammalian Cell Culture
  • 9.2. Genetic Engineering
    • 9.2.1. Gene Editing
    • 9.2.2. Gene Synthesis
    • 9.2.3. Transgenic Technology
  • 9.3. PCR And DNA Sequencing
    • 9.3.1. Next-Generation Sequencing
    • 9.3.2. PCR Kits
    • 9.3.3. Sanger Sequencing

10. Animal Biotechnology Market, by Application

  • 10.1. Diagnostics
    • 10.1.1. ELISA Kits
    • 10.1.2. Lateral Flow Assays
    • 10.1.3. PCR-Based Tests
  • 10.2. Drug Discovery
    • 10.2.1. Lead Optimization
    • 10.2.2. Preclinical Testing
    • 10.2.3. Target Identification
  • 10.3. Feed Additives
    • 10.3.1. Carbohydrases
    • 10.3.2. Phytases
    • 10.3.3. Proteases

11. Animal Biotechnology Market, by End-User

  • 11.1. Animal Farms
  • 11.2. Contract Research Organizations
  • 11.3. Pharmaceutical Companies
  • 11.4. Research Laboratories

12. Animal Biotechnology Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Animal Biotechnology Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Animal Biotechnology Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 15.3.1. Zoetis Inc.
    • 15.3.2. Merck & Co., Inc.
    • 15.3.3. Elanco Animal Health Incorporated
    • 15.3.4. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
    • 15.3.5. Ceva Sante Animale S.A.
    • 15.3.6. Dechra Pharmaceuticals PLC
    • 15.3.7. Vetoquinol S.A.
    • 15.3.8. Phibro Animal Health Corporation
    • 15.3.9. Virbac S.A.
    • 15.3.10. IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제