½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1676640

¼¼°èÀÇ Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸· ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø(-2029³â) : À¯Çü(ºÒ¼Ò°è Æú¸®¸Ó, ¼¿·ê·Î¿À½º°è, Æú¸®¼³Æù, ¼¼¶ó¹Í), ±â°ø »çÀÌÁî(0.1¹ÌÅ©·Ð ÀÌ»ó, 0.4¹ÌÅ©·Ð ÀÌ»ó, 0.8¹ÌÅ©·Ð ÀÌ»ó), ¿©°ú ¸ðµå(Å©·Î½º Ç÷οì, ´ÙÀÌ·ºÆ® Ç÷οì), ¿ëµµº°

Microfiltration Membranes Market by Type (Fluorinated Polymers, Cellulosic, Polysulfones, Ceramic), pore size (>=0.1 micron, >=0.4 micron, >=0.8 micron), Filtration Mode (Cross flow, Direct flow), Applications - Global Forecast to 2029

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: MarketsandMarkets | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 264 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : Áï½Ã¹è¼Û

    
    
    




¡Ø º» »óǰÀº ¿µ¹® ÀÚ·á·Î Çѱ۰ú ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¿¡ ºÒÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â ³»¿ëÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ì ¿µ¹®À» ¿ì¼±ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤È®ÇÑ °ËÅ並 À§ÇØ ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¸¦ Âü°íÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸· ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 2024³â 13¾ï 8,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡¼­ ¿¬Æò±Õ 9.3%ÀÇ ¿¬Æò±Õ º¹ÇÕ ¼ºÀå·ü(CAGR)·Î 2029³â¿¡´Â 21¾ï 6,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.

Á¶»ç ¹üÀ§
Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ¿¬µµ 2020-2029³â
±âÁØ¿¬µµ 2023³â
¿¹Ãø ±â°£ 2024-2029³â
´ÜÀ§ ±Ý¾×(´Þ·¯)¡¤¼ö·®(Æò¹æ¹ÌÅÍ)
ºÎ¹® À¯Çü¡¤±â°ø »çÀÌÁ¿©°ú ¸ðµå¡¤¿ëµµ¡¤Áö¿ª
´ë»ó Áö¿ª ºÏ¹Ì¡¤À¯·´¡¤¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç¡¤Áßµ¿ & ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«¡¤³²¹Ì

¼öó¸® ¼ö¿ä¿Í Æó¼ö ó¸® Áõ°¡´Â Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸· ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ Áß ÇϳªÀÔ´Ï´Ù. »ê¾÷È­, µµ½ÃÈ­, Àα¸ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇØ ´ã¼ö °ø±Þ¿¡ °úµµÇÑ ºÎÇϰ¡ °É¸®¸é¼­ ±ú²ýÇϰí Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ ¹° °ø±ÞÀ» À§ÇØ Ã·´Ü ¿©°ú ±â¼úÀÌ µµÀԵǰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. »ê¾÷Æó¼ö, ³ó¾÷Æó¼ö, ¹Ìó¸®µÈ µµ½Ã Æó¼ö´Â Á߱ݼÓ, È­Çй°Áú, ¹ÚÅ׸®¾Æ, ¹Ì¼¼ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½ µî À¯Çع°Áú·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¼öÁú¿À¿°ÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¤¹Ð¿©°ú¸·Àº Å« ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼Òºñ ¾øÀÌ ºÎÀ¯¹°Áú, ¹ÚÅ׸®¾Æ, °íºÐÀÚ¸¦ È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î Á¦°ÅÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¼¼°è °¢±¹ Á¤ºÎ¿Í ±ÔÁ¦±â°üÀº ÀÌ ±â¼ú¿¡ ¸¹Àº ÅõÀÚ¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Á¤¹Ð¿©°ú´Â À½¿ë¼öÀÇ ¼øµµ¸¦ ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇØ Áö¹æÁ¤ºÎ°¡ ¼öó¸® Ç÷£Æ®¿¡ µµÀÔÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Á¦¾à, ½Äǰ ¹× À½·á, È­ÇÐ µîÀÇ »ê¾÷¿¡¼­ °øÁ¤¼ö Á¤È­ ¹× Æó¼ö ÀçȰ¿ë¿¡µµ Ȱ¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹Ì±¹ ȯ°æº¸È£Ã»(EPA)ÀÇ ±ÔÁ¦¿Í EU Áöħ µî ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä±¸ Áõ°¡µµ Á¤¹Ð¿©°ú¸·ÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹°ÀÇ ÀçÀÌ¿ë È¿À²À» ±Ø´ëÈ­Çϰí, ¿î¿µ ºñ¿ëÀ» Àý°¨Çϸç, Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ ¹° °ü¸®¸¦ °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â ÀÌ ±â¼úÀº Àü ¼¼°è ¹° À§±â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

"Áß°ø»ç¸·°ú °íºÐÀÚ¸· ¼³°èÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀÌ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °¡Àå Å« ±âȸ·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÑ´Ù."

Áß°ø»ç¸·°ú °í¼º´É Æú¸®¸Ó ±¸Á¶ÀÇ °³¹ßÀº ¿©°ú È¿À², ³»±¸¼º ¹× °æÁ¦¼ºÀ» ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÏ¿© Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸· »ê¾÷À» Å©°Ô º¯È­½Ã۰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Áß°ø»ç ¸âºê·¹ÀÎÀº ³ôÀº Ç¥¸éÀû ´ë ºÎÇÇ ºñÀ²·Î ÀÎÇØ Åõ°ú¼ºÀÌ ³ô°í ¿©°ú ¼º´ÉÀÌ ¶Ù¾î³ª ¹úÅ© À¯Ã¼ ó¸® ¿ëµµ¿¡ ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ ¼±ÅÃÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¸âºê·¹ÀÎÀº ³ôÀº ó¸® ¿ë·®À» Á¦°øÇϹǷΠ¹ÙÀÌ¿À Á¦¾à, ¼öó¸®, ½Äǰ °¡°ø µîÀÇ »ê¾÷¿¡¼­ ºÐ¸® ǰÁú ÀúÇÏ ¾øÀÌ ´õ ºü¸¥ ¿©°ú ¼Óµµ¸¦ ´Þ¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Â÷¼¼´ë ºÒ¼ÒÈ­ Æú¸®¸Ó, °³Áú Æú¸®¿¡Å׸£¼³Æù(PES), Æú¸®¼³Æù(PS)°ú °°Àº °íºÐÀÚ¸· Àç·áÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ¸·ÀÇ ³»È­Çмº, ±â°èÀû °­µµ, ³»¿À¿°¼ºÀÌ Çâ»óµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °³¹ß·Î ¸âºê·¹ÀÎÀÇ ¼ö¸íÀÌ ±æ¾îÁö°í, ¸âºê·¹ÀÎ ±³Ã¼ ºóµµ ¹× À¯Áöº¸¼ö ºñ¿ëÀ» Àý°¨ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¼¿ÇÁ Ŭ¸®´× ¹× Àú¿À¿° ¸âºê·¹ÀÎ ÄÚÆÃÀº ¸âºê·¹ÀÎ ÆÄ¿ï¸µ ¹× ¼º´É ÀúÇÏ·Î ÀÎÇÑ °¡µ¿ Áß´Ü ½Ã°£À» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇÏ¿© ¿îÀü È¿À²À» ³ôÀÌ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µË´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ºñ¿ë Àý°¨ÀÇ ÀÌÁ¡Àº ƯÈ÷ ÀǾàǰ ¹«±Õ ¿©°ú, À¯Á¦Ç° °¡°ø, Æó¼ö ó¸® µî ¿¬¼ÓÀûÀÎ °í󸮷® ¿©°ú¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ´Â »ê¾÷ Àü¹Ý¿¡ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÏ°Ô Àû¿ëµÇ´Â ¿øµ¿·ÂÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸¿Í ±â¼ú ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î Áß°ø»ç¸·°ú °íºÐÀÚ¸·Àº °í¼º´É Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡¼­ Á¡Á¡ ´õ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ½ÃÀå ±âȸ°¡ È®´ëµÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°èÀÇ Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸· ½ÃÀåÀ» Á¶»çÇßÀ¸¸ç, ½ÃÀå °³¿ä, ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¢Á¾ ¿µÇâ¿äÀÎÀÇ ºÐ¼®, ±â¼ú¡¤Æ¯ÇãÀÇ µ¿Çâ, ¹ý±ÔÁ¦ ȯ°æ, »ç·Ê ¿¬±¸, ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð ÃßÀÌ¡¤¿¹Ãø, °¢Á¾ ±¸ºÐ¡¤Áö¿ª/ÁÖ¿ä ±¹°¡º° »ó¼¼ ºÐ¼®, °æÀï ±¸µµ, ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ °³¿ä µîÀ» Á¤¸®ÇÏ¿© ÀüÇØµå¸³´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­·Ð

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå °³¿ä

Á¦4Àå ÁÖ¿ä ÀλçÀÌÆ®

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
    • ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
    • ±âȸ
    • °úÁ¦
  • »ý¼ºÇü AIÀÇ ¿µÇâ

Á¦6Àå ¾÷°èÀÇ µ¿Çâ

  • °í°´ »ç¾÷¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â µ¿Çâ/ÆÄ±«Àû º¯È­
  • ¹ë·ùüÀÎ ºÐ¼®
  • °¡°Ý ºÐ¼®
  • ÅõÀÚ¿Í ÀÚ±ÝÁ¶´Þ ½Ã³ª¸®¿À
  • ¿¡ÄڽýºÅÛ ºÐ¼®
  • ±â¼ú ºÐ¼®
  • ƯÇ㠺м®
  • ¹«¿ª ºÐ¼®
  • ÁÖ¿ä ÄÁÆÛ·±½º¿Í À̺¥Æ®
  • °ü¼¼¿Í ±ÔÁ¦ »óȲ
  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • ÁÖ¿ä ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ¿Í ±¸ÀÔ ±âÁØ
  • °Å½Ã°æÁ¦ Àü¸Á
  • »ç·Ê ¿¬±¸ ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸·½ÃÀå : ±â°ø »çÀÌÁ

  • 0.8¹ÌÅ©·Ð ÀÌ»ó
  • 0.4¹ÌÅ©·Ð ÀÌ»ó
  • 0.1¹ÌÅ©·Ð ÀÌ»ó

Á¦8Àå Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸·½ÃÀå : ¿©°ú ¸ðµåº°

  • ´ÙÀÌ·ºÆ® Ç÷οì
  • Å©·Î½º Ç÷οì

Á¦9Àå Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸·½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°

  • Ç÷ç¿À·ÎÆú¸®¸Ó
  • ¼¿·ê·Î¿À½º
  • Æú¸®¼³Æù
  • ¼¼¶ó¹Í

Á¦10Àå Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸·½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

  • ¹ÙÀÌ¿ÀÀǾàǰ ó¸®
  • ¼öó¸®
  • ½Äǰ ¹× À½·á
  • È­ÇÐÁ¦Ç°
  • ±âŸ

Á¦11Àå Á¤¹Ð ¿©°ú¸·½ÃÀå : Áö¿ªº°

  • ºÏ¹Ì
    • ¹Ì±¹
    • ij³ª´Ù
    • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • À¯·´
    • µ¶ÀÏ
    • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
    • ÇÁ¶û½º
    • ½ºÆäÀÎ
    • ¿µ±¹
    • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
    • ±âŸ
  • ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç
    • Áß±¹
    • ÀϺ»
    • Àεµ
    • Çѱ¹
    • ±âŸ
  • Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«
    • GCC ±¹°¡
    • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
    • ±âŸ
  • ³²¹Ì
    • ºê¶óÁú
    • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª
    • ±âŸ

Á¦12Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ÁÖ¿ä Âü¿© ±â¾÷ÀÇ Àü·«/°­Á¡
  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®
  • ¸ÅÃ⠺м®
  • ºê·£µå ºñ±³
  • ±â¾÷ Æò°¡ ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º : ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷
  • ±â¾÷ Æò°¡ ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º : ½ºÅ¸Æ®¾÷/Áß¼Ò±â¾÷
  • °æÀï ½Ã³ª¸®¿À¿Í µ¿Çâ

Á¦13Àå ±â¾÷ °³¿ä

  • ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷
    • MERCK KGAA
    • SARTORIUS AG
    • KOVALUS SEPARATION SOLUTIONS
    • HYDRANAUTICS(NITTO DENKO COMPANY)
    • PALL CORPORATION
    • 3M
    • PENTAIR
    • ASAHI KASEI CORPORATION
    • TORAY INDUSTRIES INC.
    • VEOLIA
  • ±âŸ ±â¾÷
    • ALFA LAVAL
    • APPLIED MEMBRANES, INC.
    • QUA GROUP LLC
    • GEA GROUP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
    • GRAVER TECHNOLOGIES
    • IMEMFLO
    • KUBOTA CORPORATION
    • MANN+HUMMEL
    • NX FILTRATION BV
    • PARKER HANNIFIN CORP
    • SYNDER FILTRATION, INC.
    • TOSHIBA WATER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
    • NILSAN NISHOTECH SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
    • LENNTECH B.V.
    • LYDALL, INC.

Á¦14Àå ºÎ·Ï

KSA 25.03.21

The Microfiltration membranes market is projected to reach USD 2.16 billion by 2029, at a CAGR of 9.3% from USD 1.38 billion in 2024.

Scope of the Report
Years Considered for the Study2020-2029
Base Year2023
Forecast Period2024-2029
Units ConsideredValue (USD Million/USD Billion), Volume (Million square meter)
SegmentsType, pore size, filtration mode, Application and Region
Regions coveredNorth America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, South America

Increased water treatment demand and wastewater treatment is one of the key drivers for the microfiltration membranes market, driven by increased water scarcity, pollution, and more stringent regulatory standards. Industrialization, urbanization, and population expansion have placed undue stress on freshwater supplies, leading to the implementation of sophisticated filtration technology for delivering clean and sustainable water access. Industrial wastewaters, agricultural runoffs, and raw municipal wastewaters have led to gross water body pollution, which is a burden on harmful substances such as heavy metals, chemicals, bacteria, and microplastics. Governments and regulatory agencies across the globe are investing heavily in microfiltration membrane technologies to address such issues because they can effectively remove suspended solids, bacteria, and bulky macromolecules without the need for huge energy consumption. Microfiltration is being included in water treatment plants by local governments to enhance the purity of drinking water, whereas microfiltration membranes are utilized for purification of process water and wastewater recycling by industries such as pharmaceutical, food and beverages, and chemicals. Fueled by stringent wastewater discharge policies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations and European Union Water Framework Directive, the increasing regulatory needs are compelling the adoption of microfiltration membranes. The ability of the technology to maximize water reuse efficiency, reduce operation costs, and enable sustainable water management makes it an essential solution to the water crisis in the world.

As cities grow, new challenges have to be met in terms of increasing water scarcity and the better treatment of sewage and waste. Therefore, installation of Microfiltration membranes becomes a necessity to ensure that there are efficient and sustainable water management systems that can fulfill the demands of the ever-increasing needs of a huge population in an urban area. Not to mention, with all these environmental concerns being brought into the limelight, recycling capabilities and energy conservation further give Microfiltration membranes an attraction to green infrastructure initiatives.

"The high initial investment & operational costs is the most prevalent restraining factor for the microfiltration membranes industry"

One of the significant hindrances to the widespread application of microfiltration membranes is the high cost of initial and operational installation and maintenance. While microfiltration affords greater filtration selectivity, the expense of membrane materials, equipment installation, and ancillary equipment-pressure vessels, pumps, and automation monitor systems, for instance-can prove to be economically disastrous, particularly to small-scale businesses and municipal water treatment authorities in developing economies. High-performance membranes like fluorinated polymers PTFE and PVDF or ceramic membranes have excellent chemical stability and mechanical strength but are very expensive to produce and hence system buying becomes a significant investment. Biofouling and organic contaminant fouling, bacteria, and mineral precipitate can reduce the filtration rate over time with more frequent cleaning and new membrane requirements, thereby increasing operating cost. Special cleaning agents, membrane regeneration, and rigorous maintenance routines are needed to ensure performance but add to overall cost. Continuous filtration also requires trained personnel to monitor system performance, troubleshoot malfunctions, and ensure regulatory compliance, further driving costs of operation. Where feedwater quality is fluctuating, such as in wastewater treatment, food and beverage manufacture, and pharmaceuticals, multiple levels of contaminants necessitate ongoing adjustments in system parameters, which drive energy usage and process complexity. Confronted by these cost restraints, companies opt more generally for more budget-friendly processes such as sand filtration, activated carbon filtration, or ultrafiltration, limiting microfiltration membranes' widescale application regardless of their excellent filter performance.

"Advancements in Hollow Fiber & Polymeric Membrane Designs proved to be the largest opportunity for the microfiltration membranes market"

Developments in hollow fiber membranes and high-performance polymeric structures are transforming the microfiltration membrane industry to a great extent by optimizing filtration efficiency, durability, and economics. Hollow fiber membranes are more permeable due to high surface area-to-volume ratio and provide better filtration performance, making them an ideal selection for bulk fluid processing applications. These membranes deliver higher throughput, enabling industries such as biopharmaceuticals, water treatment, and food processing to achieve faster filtration rates without compromising better separation quality. In addition, advancements in polymeric membrane materials such as next-generation fluorinated polymers, modified polyethersulfone (PES), and polysulfone (PS) have introduced higher membrane chemical resistance, mechanical strength, and fouling resistance. These developments allow longer membrane life, reducing the rate of replacements and maintenance costs. Moreover, self-cleaning and low-fouling membrane coatings have assisted in enhancing efficiency of operation through minimizing downtime because of membrane fouling and loss of performance. Such cost-saving benefits are driving wider application across industries that rely on continuous high-throughput filtration, particularly pharmaceutical sterile filtration, dairy processing, and wastewater treatment. As a result of continuous research and advances in technology, hollow fiber and polymeric membranes will be poised to play an increasingly important role in high-performance microfiltration systems, holding out for expanded market opportunities.

"Membrane Fouling and Biofouling is a Major Challenge for the Microfiltration Membranes Market"

One of the most common and serious issues in the microfiltration membrane industry is membrane fouling and biofouling, which profoundly decreases filtration effectiveness, raises working costs, and shortens membrane life. Fouling takes place when particles, organic contaminants, microorganisms, or mineral accumulations on the membrane surface or inside its pores cause clogging and decreased permeability. Such is particularly common in operations like water treatment, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology, where sterilizing filtration, microbial contamination control, and the removal of suspended solids are normally done using microfiltration. Fouling of the membranes can result in up to 50% reduction in the filtration performance for the first months of plant operation, which will be based on the feedwater quality and type of membrane. Biofouling, being one form of fouling through the growth of microbes and the formation of biofilm, is a serious concern for high-purity applications including pharmaceutical manufacture and ultrapure water systems.

There has been an indication from research that biofilms on the surface of the membrane can raise energy consumption by 30-50% because of extra pressure needed to sustain flow rates. Biofouling has been confirmed as one of the most prevalent reasons for membrane failure in wastewater treatment and desalination facilities, necessitating regular shutdowns and replacements. As a fouling mitigation measure, industries have been using chemical cleaning, backflushing, and sophisticated pretreatment techniques like coagulation, filtration, and disinfection.

These mitigation measures, however, contribute to operating expense and sophistication, which makes microfiltration less appealing to cost-sensitive industries. The frequent replacement of the membrane due to irreversible fouling contributes even higher expenses, with the cost of the membrane comprising 30-50% of the overall filtration system cost over its life. As technologies come to be formulated in low-fouling materials for membranes, hydrophilic coatings, and self-cleaning mechanisms, these are not merely manufactured but normally at some additional cost, imposing a balance between functionality and price. The persistent fouling control issue highlights the necessity for ongoing innovations in membrane maintenance and design technologies. Until low-cost, durable anti-fouling technologies are universally available, membrane fouling and biofouling will continue to be a major disincentive for the widespread use of microfiltration technology, especially in cost-sensitive economies.

"Cross flow filtration mode continues to dominate the Microfiltration membranes market, further solidifying its role as the leading grade for a wide range of applications"

Cross-flow filtration is the market leader in the microfiltration membranes market over direct flow filtration due to its increased efficiency, increased membrane life, and reduced maintenance requirements. In cross-flow filtration, a portion of fluid continuously flows parallel to the membrane surface without permitting particles to settle and thus reducing membrane fouling. Direct flow filtration entails contaminants accumulating quickly with membrane clogging that necessitates frequent membrane replacement. Cross-flow filtration is widely favored by industries like water treatment, food & beverage, pharma, and biotechnology because of its requirement for continuous operation and high capacity. It offers improved filtration efficiency, improved recovery rates, and can handle higher solid loads, thereby being applicable for sterile filtration processes or particle separation. Cross-flow systems further reduce downtime during operations and limit the need for frequent cleaning, thereby saving money in the long run. As industries are increasingly process-optimizing and membrane-long-lasting, cross-flow filtration is the preference of choice, which accounts for its dominance in the microfiltration membranes market.

"Based on region, asia pacific was the largest market in 2023."

Asia Pacific is the global market leader in microfiltration membranes, driven by industrialization, increasing population, and the demand for food and water safety. The three top economies are China, India, and Japan, supported by growing pharmaceutical, biotechnology, food & beverage, and water treatment sectors. The area has a critical scarcity of water as well as pollution issues, compelling governments to invest heavily in new water treatment plants to provide pure drinking water as well as effective wastewater treatment. Besides, advanced biopharmaceutical and health care industries are driving demand for sterile filtration apparatus. The dairy processing, food and beverage business, beverage making, and the brewing industry predominantly depend on microfiltration membranes to ensure the quality and purity of the final product. Apart from that, reduced production expenses and domestic availability of prominent membrane producers fuel market acceptability and adoption. As stringent environmental regulations and increasing interest in sustainability necessitate microfiltration membranes to be used more and more in industrial wastewater treatment as well as air treatment, the market gets additional thrust in Asia Pacific.

.

In the process of determining and verifying the market size for several segments and subsegments identified through secondary research, extensive primary interviews were conducted. A breakdown of the profiles of the primary interviewees is as follows:

  • By Company Type: Tier 1 - 40%, Tier 2 - 30%, and Tier 3 - 30%
  • By Designation: C-Level Executives - 20%, Director Level - 10%, and Others - 70%
  • By Region: North America - 30%, Europe -20%, Asia Pacific - 30%, Middle East & Africa - 10%, and South America-10%

The key players in this market are Merck KGaA (Germany), Sartorius AG (Germany), Kovalus Separation Solutions (US), Hydranautics (US), Pall Corporation (US), 3M (US), Pentair (UK), Asahi Kasei Corporation (Japan), TORAY INDUSTRIES, INC. (Japan), Veolia (France) etc.

Research Coverage

This report segments the market for the Microfiltration membranes on the basis of type, application and region. It provides estimations for the overall value of the market across various regions. A detailed analysis of key industry players has been conducted to provide insights into their business overviews, products & services, key strategies, new product launches, expansions, and partnerships associated with the market for the Microfiltration membranes market.

Key benefits of buying this report

This research report is focused on various levels of analysis - industry analysis (industry trends), market ranking analysis of top players, and company profiles, which together provide an overall view of the competitive landscape, emerging and high-growth segments of the Microfiltration membranes market; high-growth regions; and market drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:

  • Analysis of key drivers: Microfiltration membranes being ideal for water and wastewater management, irrigation, and gas distribution systems thus and most suitable for the construction.
  • Market Penetration: Comprehensive information on the Microfiltration membranes offered by top players in the global Microfiltration membranes market.
  • Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on upcoming technologies, research & development activities, and new product launches in the Microfiltration membranes market.
  • Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative emerging markets - the report analyzes the markets for the Microfiltration membranes across regions.
  • Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products, untapped regions, and recent developments in the global Microfiltration membranes market.
  • Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, strategies, products, and manufacturing capabilities of leading players in the Microfiltration membranes market.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
  • 1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
  • 1.3 STUDY SCOPE
    • 1.3.1 MARKET SEGMENTATION AND REGIONAL SPREAD
    • 1.3.2 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
    • 1.3.3 YEARS CONSIDERED
    • 1.3.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
    • 1.3.5 UNITS CONSIDERED
  • 1.4 LIMITATIONS
  • 1.5 STAKEHOLDERS

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 2.1 RESEARCH DATA
    • 2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
      • 2.1.1.1 Key data from secondary sources
    • 2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
      • 2.1.2.1 Key data from primary sources
      • 2.1.2.2 Key primary sources
      • 2.1.2.3 Key participants for primary interviews
      • 2.1.2.4 Breakdown of interviews with experts
      • 2.1.2.5 Key industry insights
  • 2.2 BASE NUMBER CALCULATION
    • 2.2.1 SUPPLY-SIDE ANALYSIS
    • 2.2.2 DEMAND-SIDE ANALYSIS
  • 2.3 GROWTH FORECAST
    • 2.3.1 SUPPLY SIDE
    • 2.3.2 DEMAND SIDE
  • 2.4 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
    • 2.4.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
    • 2.4.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
  • 2.5 DATA TRIANGULATION
  • 2.6 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
  • 2.7 GROWTH FORECAST
  • 2.8 RISK ASSESSMENT
  • 2.9 FACTOR ANALYSIS

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS

  • 4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS IN MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET
  • 4.2 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY FILTRATION MODE
  • 4.3 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY MATERIAL TYPE
  • 4.4 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY APPLICATION
  • 4.5 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY PORE SIZE
  • 4.6 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY KEY COUNTRY

5 MARKET OVERVIEW

  • 5.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS
    • 5.2.1 DRIVERS
      • 5.2.1.1 Increasing awareness of water & wastewater treatment
      • 5.2.1.2 Stringent wastewater regulations
      • 5.2.1.3 Selective separation technologies
    • 5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
      • 5.2.2.1 Reduced membrane performance due to fouling
      • 5.2.2.2 High capital cost
    • 5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
      • 5.2.3.1 Increasing demand for water treatment in developing countries
      • 5.2.3.2 Rising scarcity of freshwater
    • 5.2.4 CHALLENGES
      • 5.2.4.1 Lifespan and efficiency of membranes
  • 5.3 IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AI
    • 5.3.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 5.3.2 IMPACT OF GEN AI ON MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET

6 INDUSTRY TRENDS

  • 6.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 6.2 TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS
  • 6.3 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
    • 6.3.1 RAW MATERIAL SUPPLIERS
    • 6.3.2 MANUFACTURERS
    • 6.3.3 DISTRIBUTORS AND RETAILERS
    • 6.3.4 END USERS
  • 6.4 PRICING ANALYSIS
    • 6.4.1 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY REGION, 2020-2024
    • 6.4.2 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY TYPE, 2020-2024
    • 6.4.3 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY TYPE (USD/SQUARE METER)
  • 6.5 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO
  • 6.6 ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
  • 6.7 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
    • 6.7.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
    • 6.7.2 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
    • 6.7.3 ADJACENT TECHNOLOGIES
  • 6.8 PATENT ANALYSIS
    • 6.8.1 METHODOLOGY
    • 6.8.2 PATENTS GRANTED WORLDWIDE, 2014-2024
    • 6.8.3 PATENT PUBLICATION TRENDS
    • 6.8.4 INSIGHTS
    • 6.8.5 LEGAL STATUS OF PATENTS
    • 6.8.6 JURISDICTION ANALYSIS
    • 6.8.7 TOP APPLICANTS
    • 6.8.8 LIST OF MAJOR PATENTS
  • 6.9 TRADE ANALYSIS
    • 6.9.1 IMPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 84212900)
    • 6.9.2 EXPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 84212900)
  • 6.10 KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS, 2025
  • 6.11 TARIFF AND REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
    • 6.11.1 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
    • 6.11.2 REGULATIONS RELATED TO MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET
  • 6.12 PORTER'S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
    • 6.12.1 THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
    • 6.12.2 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
    • 6.12.3 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
    • 6.12.4 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
    • 6.12.5 INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
  • 6.13 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING CRITERIA
    • 6.13.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
    • 6.13.2 BUYING CRITERIA
  • 6.14 MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
    • 6.14.1 GDP TRENDS AND FORECASTS, BY COUNTRY
  • 6.15 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
    • 6.15.1 ADDRESSING MEMBRANE FOULING IN A DESALINATION PLANT
    • 6.15.2 ONGOING ADVANCEMENTS IN MATERIALS, PRE-TREATMENT, AND CLEANING WILL BOOST CERAMIC MEMBRANE ADOPTION IN INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
    • 6.15.3 DEVELOPMENT OF OLIVE SEED-BASED CERAMIC MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANE

7 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY PORE SIZE

  • 7.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 7.2 >=0.8 MICRON
    • 7.2.1 IDEAL FOR COARSE FILTRATION AND PROTECTING SENSITIVE MEMBRANE SYSTEMS FROM PREMATURE FOULING
  • 7.3 >=0.4 MICRON
    • 7.3.1 INCREASING DEMAND DUE TO HIGH THROUGHPUT AND EXTENDED LIFESPAN FOR EFFICIENT, MODERATE PRECISION FILTRATION
  • 7.4 >=0.1 MICRONS
    • 7.4.1 GROWING USE FOR NEAR-STERILE FILTRATION WITH EXCEPTIONAL RELIABILITY, PURITY, AND CONTAMINATION CONTROL.

8 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY FILTRATION MODE

  • 8.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 8.2 DIRECT FLOW
    • 8.2.1 EXTENSIVE USE IN ADSORPTIVE FILTRATION FOR COLOR ADJUSTMENT
  • 8.3 CROSS FLOW
    • 8.3.1 HIGH USE IN BEVERAGE CLARIFICATION

9 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY TYPE

  • 9.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 9.2 FLUORINATED POLYMERS
    • 9.2.1 INCREASING DEMAND DUE TO CHEMICAL RESISTANCE AND STRENGTH
  • 9.3 CELLULOSIC
    • 9.3.1 MATERIAL ENHANCEMENTS AND CROSS-LINKING TO BOOST DURABILITY AND ADOPTION
  • 9.4 POLYSULFONES
    • 9.4.1 HYDROPHILIC NATURE REDUCING FOULING AND EXTENDS LIFESPAN
  • 9.5 CERAMIC
    • 9.5.1 DEMAND GROWTH OF HYBRID CERAMIC-POLYMER MEMBRANES AND NANOCOATINGS

10 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY APPLICATION

  • 10.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 10.2 BIOPHARMACEUTICAL PROCESSING
    • 10.2.1 CRUCIAL ROLE IN SEPARATING CONTAMINANTS AND ENSURING PROCESS EFFICIENCY
  • 10.3 WATER TREATMENT
    • 10.3.1 INCREASING NEED FOR HIGH-QUALITY WATER
  • 10.4 FOOD & BEVERAGE
    • 10.4.1 STRICT SAFETY STANDARDS AND DEMAND FOR MINIMALLY PROCESSED PRODUCTS
  • 10.5 CHEMICAL
    • 10.5.1 RECOVERY OF VALUABLE BYPRODUCTS FROM WASTE STREAMS, SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING
  • 10.6 OTHER APPLICATIONS

11 MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES MARKET, BY REGION

  • 11.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 11.2 NORTH AMERICA
    • 11.2.1 US
      • 11.2.1.1 Government regulations on wastewater treatment to drive market
    • 11.2.2 CANADA
      • 11.2.2.1 Increasing government support on wastewater treatment to accelerate market growth
    • 11.2.3 MEXICO
      • 11.2.3.1 Industrial sector to drive market
  • 11.3 EUROPE
    • 11.3.1 GERMANY
      • 11.3.1.1 Regulations and positive economic outlook to support market growth
    • 11.3.2 ITALY
      • 11.3.2.1 Rising need for clean water and positive economic outlook to drive market
    • 11.3.3 FRANCE
      • 11.3.3.1 Government regulations for wastewater treatment to support market growth
    • 11.3.4 SPAIN
      • 11.3.4.1 Government focus on water and wastewater treatment to drive market
    • 11.3.5 UK
      • 11.3.5.1 Growing end-use industries and government initiatives to support market growth
    • 11.3.6 RUSSIA
      • 11.3.6.1 Growing food & beverage and e-commerce industries to drive market
    • 11.3.7 REST OF EUROPE
  • 11.4 ASIA PACIFIC
    • 11.4.1 CHINA
      • 11.4.1.1 Growing manufacturing sector to drive market in Asia Pacific
    • 11.4.2 JAPAN
      • 11.4.2.1 Development of advanced technologies and rapid industrialization to drive market
    • 11.4.3 INDIA
      • 11.4.3.1 Rising population, growing economy, and increasing adoption of wastewater technologies supporting market growth
    • 11.4.4 SOUTH KOREA
      • 11.4.4.1 Food & beverage industry, skilled workforce, and laws & regulations to drive market
    • 11.4.5 REST OF ASIA PACIFIC
  • 11.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
    • 11.5.1 GCC COUNTRIES
      • 11.5.1.1 UAE
        • 11.5.1.1.1 Growing end-use industries and government investment in wastewater treatment to drive market
      • 11.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
        • 11.5.1.2.1 Immense growth of water filtration industry to drive market
      • 11.5.1.3 Rest of GCC countries
    • 11.5.2 SOUTH AFRICA
      • 11.5.2.1 Stringent government regulations supporting market growth
    • 11.5.3 REST OF MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
  • 11.6 SOUTH AMERICA
    • 11.6.1 BRAZIL
      • 11.6.1.1 Stringent regulations, industrialization, and growing population to drive market
    • 11.6.2 ARGENTINA
      • 11.6.2.1 Recovering economy to boost market growth
    • 11.6.3 REST OF SOUTH AMERICA

12 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 12.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 12.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN, 2021- 2025
  • 12.3 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS, 2023
  • 12.4 REVENUE ANALYSIS, 2020-2024
  • 12.5 BRAND COMPARISON
  • 12.6 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2023
    • 12.6.1 STARS
    • 12.6.2 EMERGING LEADERS
    • 12.6.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
    • 12.6.4 PARTICIPANTS
    • 12.6.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS (2023)
      • 12.6.5.1 Company footprint
      • 12.6.5.2 Region footprint
      • 12.6.5.3 Type footprint
      • 12.6.5.4 Application footprint
      • 12.6.5.5 Mode footprint
  • 12.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES, 2023
    • 12.7.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
    • 12.7.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
    • 12.7.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
    • 12.7.4 STARTING BLOCKS
    • 12.7.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: STARTUPS/SMES, (2023)
      • 12.7.5.1 Detailed list of key startups/SMEs
      • 12.7.5.2 Competitive benchmarking of key startups/SMEs
    • 12.7.6 VALUATION AND FINANCIAL METRICS OF KEY MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANE VENDORS
  • 12.8 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO AND TRENDS
    • 12.8.1 PRODUCT LAUNCHES
    • 12.8.2 DEALS
    • 12.8.3 EXPANSIONS

13 COMPANY PROFILES

  • 13.1 KEY PLAYERS
    • 13.1.1 MERCK KGAA
      • 13.1.1.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.1.2 Products/solutions/services offered
      • 13.1.1.3 Recent developments
        • 13.1.1.3.1 Deals
        • 13.1.1.3.2 Expansions
      • 13.1.1.4 MnM view
        • 13.1.1.4.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.1.4.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.1.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
    • 13.1.2 SARTORIUS AG
      • 13.1.2.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.2.2 Products/solutions/services offered
      • 13.1.2.3 Recent developments
        • 13.1.2.3.1 Product launches
        • 13.1.2.3.2 Deals
        • 13.1.2.3.3 Expansions
      • 13.1.2.4 MnM view
        • 13.1.2.4.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.2.4.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.2.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
    • 13.1.3 KOVALUS SEPARATION SOLUTIONS
      • 13.1.3.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.3.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
      • 13.1.3.3 Recent developments
        • 13.1.3.3.1 Product launches
        • 13.1.3.3.2 Deals
        • 13.1.3.3.3 Expansions
      • 13.1.3.4 MnM view
        • 13.1.3.4.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.3.4.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.3.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
    • 13.1.4 HYDRANAUTICS (NITTO DENKO COMPANY)
      • 13.1.4.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.4.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
      • 13.1.4.3 MnM view
        • 13.1.4.3.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.4.3.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.4.3.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
    • 13.1.5 PALL CORPORATION
      • 13.1.5.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.5.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
      • 13.1.5.3 Recent developments
        • 13.1.5.3.1 Deals
      • 13.1.5.4 MnM view
        • 13.1.5.4.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.5.4.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.5.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
    • 13.1.6 3M
      • 13.1.6.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.6.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
      • 13.1.6.3 MnM view
        • 13.1.6.3.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.6.3.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.6.3.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
    • 13.1.7 PENTAIR
      • 13.1.7.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.7.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
      • 13.1.7.3 Recent developments
        • 13.1.7.3.1 Product launches
      • 13.1.7.4 MnM view
        • 13.1.7.4.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.7.4.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.7.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
    • 13.1.8 ASAHI KASEI CORPORATION
      • 13.1.8.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.8.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
      • 13.1.8.3 MnM view
        • 13.1.8.3.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.8.3.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.8.3.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
    • 13.1.9 TORAY INDUSTRIES INC.
      • 13.1.9.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.9.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
      • 13.1.9.3 MnM view
        • 13.1.9.3.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.9.3.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.9.3.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
    • 13.1.10 VEOLIA
      • 13.1.10.1 Business overview
      • 13.1.10.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
      • 13.1.10.3 Recent developments
        • 13.1.10.3.1 Deals
      • 13.1.10.4 MnM view
        • 13.1.10.4.1 Right to win
        • 13.1.10.4.2 Strategic choices
        • 13.1.10.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 13.2 OTHER PLAYERS
    • 13.2.1 ALFA LAVAL
    • 13.2.2 APPLIED MEMBRANES, INC.
    • 13.2.3 QUA GROUP LLC
    • 13.2.4 GEA GROUP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
    • 13.2.5 GRAVER TECHNOLOGIES
    • 13.2.6 IMEMFLO
    • 13.2.7 KUBOTA CORPORATION
    • 13.2.8 MANN+HUMMEL
    • 13.2.9 NX FILTRATION BV
    • 13.2.10 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP
    • 13.2.11 SYNDER FILTRATION, INC.
    • 13.2.12 TOSHIBA WATER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
    • 13.2.13 NILSAN NISHOTECH SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.
    • 13.2.14 LENNTECH B.V.
    • 13.2.15 LYDALL, INC.

14 APPENDIX

  • 14.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE
  • 14.2 KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS' SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
  • 14.3 CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
  • 14.4 RELATED REPORTS
  • 14.5 AUTHOR DETAILS
ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦