당뇨병용 채혈 기기 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the diabetic lancing device market size is projected to expand from USD 1.07 billion in 2025 and USD 1.13 billion in 2026 to USD 1.51 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 5.86% between 2026 to 2031.

This report is Segmented by Product Type (Reusable Lancing Devices, Disposable Safety Lancets, and More), Lancet Type (28G-30G Lancets, 31G-33G Lancets, and More), Usage (Home Care / Self-Monitoring, and Clinical Use), End User (Hospitals & Clinics, Diagnostic Laboratories, and More), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Diabetic Lancing Device Market Trends and Insights

Rising Global Diabetes Prevalence Increasing Demand for SMBG Devices

The International Diabetes Federation reported that 589 million adults were living with diabetes in 2024, and that figure is expected to rise materially over the longer term, which keeps the diabetic lancing device market tied to a steadily expanding care population. The same data showed that more than 80% of new cases were occurring in low and middle-income countries, where continuous glucose monitoring penetration remained low, and SMBG stayed the practical monitoring standard for many patients. This geographic pattern matters because South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America continue to add first-time users who need capillary blood testing tools early in their care pathway. Those users usually generate lower revenue per patient than consumers in high-income markets, but they also face less risk of shifting quickly to more expensive continuous monitoring alternatives. That makes the diabetic lancing device market more volume resilient than headline technology transition narratives sometimes suggest. It also gives suppliers a durable base of repeat lancet demand that stays relevant even when premium glucose monitoring adoption accelerates elsewhere.

Increasing Adoption of Home-Based Diabetes Monitoring

Home care and self-monitoring show how strongly the diabetic lancing device market still depends on everyday testing behavior outside hospitals and clinics. A 2025 study in BMC Public Health found that reimbursement support for blood glucose test strips was associated with improved glycemic control among insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients, which supports continued payer logic for covering SMBG consumables that include lancets and lancing devices. Demand in home settings is also reinforced by older patient groups, since people aged 60 years and above often follow care plans that require multiple checks each day. Bundled SMBG kits that combine a meter, strips, a lancing device, and lancets have also made the purchase cycle simpler for consumers and more predictable for suppliers. As online pharmacy and direct-to-consumer channels grow, these bundles help normalize repeat purchasing across chronic care routines. Connected kits add another retention layer because the lancing act becomes part of a broader monitoring routine rather than a separate low-value accessory.

Growing Adoption of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems

Continuous glucose monitoring remains the strongest structural restraint on the diabetic lancing device market because it reduces the need for repeated fingerstick sampling among high-frequency testers. Abbott secured CE Mark in May 2026 for Libre Duo and Libre Duo 10 Day, which brought dual glucose and ketone sensing into the category and extended the functional advantage of CGM beyond glucose tracking alone. The American Diabetes Association also stated in its 2025 standards of care that CGM should be considered from the outset for insulin-requiring diabetes management, which strengthens institutional support for sensor-based monitoring. Even so, replacement is not immediate because cost, reimbursement gaps, and behavior patterns still slow CGM uptake outside specialist care and higher-income user groups. The result is a medium-term pressure point rather than a complete near-term displacement of fingerstick testing across all patient segments. This means the diabetic lancing device market still retains substantial relevance in mixed-care systems where SMBG and CGM continue to coexist.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Technological Advancements Toward Painless and Automated Lancing Devices
2. Growing Preference for Single-Use Safety Lancets in Clinical Settings
3. Limited Awareness and Affordability Challenges in Low-Income Regions

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Reusable lancing devices held 42.57% of the diabetic lancing device market share in 2025, which reflected their long-established role as multi-use systems for people who test frequently at home. Their position remained strong because adjustable penetration depth settings give users better control over comfort and blood volume during routine sampling. Compatibility with a wide range of lancet gauges also lets patients tailor the testing experience without replacing the full device body. This flexibility matters in home care, where users often balance pain tolerance, skin condition, and testing frequency over long periods. It also helps explain why reusable formats still anchor a large part of the diabetic lancing device market despite the rise of safer single-use alternatives.

Disposable safety lancets are projected to expand at a 6.12% CAGR through 2031, making them the fastest-growing product category as infection control requirements keep widening across professional care settings. In the United States, the regulatory treatment of multi-patient blood lancets under 21 CFR §878.4850 continues to channel clinical procurement toward single-use safety-engineered designs. Standard lancets still preserve unit volume in price-sensitive pharmacy channels, but private-label production in China and India continues to tighten margins for that category. Automatic lancing devices occupy a smaller premium niche because they appeal to pediatric users and to adults who want more controlled and less visible penetration. Across the diabetic lancing device industry, the product mix is shifting toward single-use hygiene on one side and comfort-focused automation on the other.

The 31G to 33G segment represented 48.26% of the diabetic lancing device market size in 2025, showing that finer gauges remain the preferred choice for users who value lower pain and less tissue trauma. That preference matters because discomfort at the sampling point can affect how consistently people follow recommended testing routines. A 2026 observational study in Scientific Reports found that 81.6% of diabetic patients did not replace lancets between fingerstick tests, which highlighted how user behavior and discomfort can still interfere with correct SMBG practice. Fine-gauge demand is also supported by product engineering beyond gauge alone, since coating and entry smoothness can materially change perceived comfort. Ascensia's MICROLET lancets illustrate this point through a silicone-coated design that aims to improve skin entry performance.

The 28G to 30G segment is expected to grow at a 6.89% CAGR through 2031, mainly because clinical settings often need a larger blood drop and a more dependable sample with lower actuation force. Hospitals and laboratories tend to prioritize adequacy and throughput over maximum comfort when many tests must be performed quickly and consistently. This makes mid-gauge lancets commercially important even as finer gauges lead in home care. The 34G and above category remains smaller and more specialized, with demand concentrated in pediatric and geriatric care where skin fragility is a stronger concern. Across the diabetic lancing device market, gauge choice therefore reflects a split between comfort-led retail use and workflow-led professional use. ISO 23908:2024 further shapes this segment by influencing sharps protection, material requirements, and tip geometry standards across single-use lancet formats.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Product Type
  • Reusable Lancing Devices
  • Disposable Safety Lancets
  • Standard Lancets
  • Automatic Lancing Device
• By Lancet Type
  • 28G-30G Lancets
  • 31G-33G Lancets
  • 34G and Above Lancets
• By Usage
  • Home Care / Self-Monitoring
  • Clinical Use
• By End User
  • Hospitals & Clinics
  • Diagnostic Laboratories
  • Home Healthcare
  • Others
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • GCC
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East and Africa
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America

Geography Analysis

North America held 37.46% of the diabetic lancing device market share in 2025, supported by high SMBG adoption, structured reimbursement, and the entrenched presence of large suppliers such as BD, Roche, and Abbott. The United States remained the largest national market because clinical and retail demand both benefited from established blood glucose monitoring pathways. Regulatory treatment of blood lancets under 21 CFR §878.4850 also reinforced procurement preference for safety-oriented formats in professional care settings. Canada and Mexico added volume through pharmacy and private-label channels that served more price-sensitive buyers. Regional growth was slower than in emerging areas because CGM substitution was stronger among insulin-dependent patients, even though home diagnostics still supported ongoing demand in the diabetic lancing device market.

Europe remained the second-largest regional base for the diabetic lancing device market, with Germany, the United Kingdom, and France acting as the main demand centers for home healthcare and clinical lancet consumption. ISO 23908:2024 and broader European device compliance expectations kept procurement focused on single-use safety products and favored suppliers with stronger post-market systems. These conditions helped established players defend their position and limited faster expansion by low-cost entrants without developed compliance infrastructure. The Middle East and Africa remained smaller in revenue terms, but public screening initiatives were still creating meaningful future demand, as AMPATH Kenya expanded diabetes and hypertension screening across 23 facilities and screened more than 81,000 individuals between July 2024 and December 2025.

Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at 9.37% CAGR, which makes it the fastest-rising diabetic lancing device market size through 2031. The region combines a very large diabetes burden with increasing investment in SMBG access, which supports both basic volume growth and a gradual move toward better device quality. China provides a large base for lower-priced domestic supply, while international brands compete more on accuracy, connectivity, and device quality. South America is also moving upward, led by Brazil and Argentina, where urban diabetes management programs and pharmacy distribution continue to support broader product access. Even so, healthcare spending cycles and currency volatility still limit how quickly premium formats can scale across parts of the region.

1. Abbott Laboratories
2. AgaMatrix, Inc.
3. Arkray
4. Ascensia Diabetes Care Holdings AG
5. AUVON Technology Co., Ltd.
6. B. Braun
7. Beckton Dickinson
8. Cardinal Health
9. Roche
10. Genteel LLC
11. HTL-Strefa S.A.
12. Medline Industries
13. Nipro
14. Owen Mumford Limited
15. Sanofi
16. Sarstedt
17. Terumo
18. Trividia Health, Inc.
19. Vitrex Medical A/S
20. Ypsomed

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Rising Global Diabetes Prevalence Increasing Demand for SMBG Devices
  • 4.2.2 Increasing Adoption of Home-Based Diabetes Monitoring
  • 4.2.3 Technological Advancements toward Painless and Automated Lancing Devices
  • 4.2.4 Increasing Diabetes Screening Programs in Emerging Markets
  • 4.2.5 Growing Preference for Single-Use Safety Lancets in Clinical Settings
  • 4.2.6 Integration of Lancing Devices with Connected Diabetes Management Kits
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Growing Adoption of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems
  • 4.3.2 Limited Awareness and Affordability Challenges in Low-Income Regions
  • 4.3.3 Price Pressure from Commodity Lancets and Private Label Alternatives
  • 4.3.4 Reuse Behavior and Low Testing Compliance in Certain Patient Groups
• 4.4 Value And Supply-Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts

• 5.1 By Product Type
  • 5.1.1 Reusable Lancing Devices
  • 5.1.2 Disposable Safety Lancets
  • 5.1.3 Standard Lancets
  • 5.1.4 Automatic Lancing Device
• 5.2 By Lancet Type
  • 5.2.1 28G-30G Lancets
  • 5.2.2 31G-33G Lancets
  • 5.2.3 34G and Above Lancets
• 5.3 By Usage
  • 5.3.1 Home Care / Self-Monitoring
  • 5.3.2 Clinical Use
• 5.4 By End User
  • 5.4.1 Hospitals & Clinics
  • 5.4.2 Diagnostic Laboratories
  • 5.4.3 Home Healthcare
  • 5.4.4 Others
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 India
    • 5.5.3.3 Japan
    • 5.5.3.4 Australia
    • 5.5.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
  • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Market Share Analysis
• 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as Available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.3.1 Abbott Laboratories
  • 6.3.2 AgaMatrix, Inc.
  • 6.3.3 ARKRAY, Inc.
  • 6.3.4 Ascensia Diabetes Care Holdings AG
  • 6.3.5 AUVON Technology Co., Ltd.
  • 6.3.6 B. Braun Melsungen AG
  • 6.3.7 Becton Dickinson and Company
  • 6.3.8 Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • 6.3.9 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  • 6.3.10 Genteel LLC
  • 6.3.11 HTL-Strefa S.A.
  • 6.3.12 Medline Industries, LP
  • 6.3.13 Nipro Corporation
  • 6.3.14 Owen Mumford Limited
  • 6.3.15 Sanofi S.A.
  • 6.3.16 SARSTEDT AG & Co. KG
  • 6.3.17 Terumo Corporation
  • 6.3.18 Trividia Health, Inc.
  • 6.3.19 Vitrex Medical A/S
  • 6.3.20 Ypsomed Holding AG

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-Space And Unmet-Need Assessment