설탕 포장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the sugar packaging market size was valued at USD 6.91 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 7.09 billion in 2026 to reach USD 8.56 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 3.84% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This report is Segmented by Packaging Type (Flexible Packaging, and Rigid Packaging), Material Type (Plastic, Paper, and Bio-Based and Compostable Materials), Packaging Size (<=1 Kg, 2-5 Kg, and More), End User (Large Scale, Medium Scale, and Small Scale Manufacturers), and Geography (North America, South America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Sugar Packaging Market Trends and Insights

Steady Increase in Sugar Consumption in Emerging Economies

Per-capita intake in India climbed to 20.1 kilograms in 2025, and similar gains appeared in Indonesia and Vietnam, lifting baseline demand for both bulk sacks and retail pouches. The 2-5 kilogram bracket benefits most because household shopping trips in these markets balance price sensitivity with storage constraints. In China, organic and specialty sugars represented 8% of consumption in 2025, requiring tamper-evident, resealable packs that justify price premiums. Southeast Asia's net imports rose 4.2% year-on-year, further expanding volumes through flexible formats that withstand tropical humidity. Altogether, heightened regional consumption is a direct growth engine for the sugar packaging market.

Rising Demand for Customized and Sustainable Packaging Formats

The European Union's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation, fully enforced in 2025, compels 65% recyclability or compostability by 2030, steering converters toward mono-material polyethylene and polylactic acid substrates. Mondi reported that bio-attributed resins reached 42% of its food-flexible mix in 2025, up sharply from 28% two years earlier. Brands are also embracing single-serve sachets with tear notches, resealable zippers, and laser scoring for portion control, all of which heighten shelf appeal. Amcor's AmLite family, introduced mid-2025, cut film gauge by 15% yet preserved barrier performance via nano-clay coatings, lowering carbon intensity and shipping weight. These design shifts keep the sugar packaging market on a path of premiumization, even as raw material prices fluctuate.

Operational and Regulatory Compliance Costs for Converters

Extended Producer Responsibility fees averaged EUR 0.12 per kilogram (USD 0.13) of plastic packaging in France, Germany, and the Netherlands during 2025, squeezing converter margins and raising shelf prices by 3-5%. Smaller converters unable to absorb these charges exited commodity contracts, prompting some supply chain consolidation. New recyclability testing rules add EUR 8,000-EUR 15,000 (USD 8,500-USD 16,000) per SKU, an upfront burden that lengthens payback periods for new film constructions. Varying standards in Canada and Asian markets complicate inventory management and duplicate testing. The result is a drag on expansion plans, especially for mid-size firms, within the sugar packaging market.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Growth of E-commerce Fueling Unit-Sized Sugar Packs
2. Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Traceability for Premium Sugars
3. Shift Toward Alternative Sweeteners Reducing Per-Capita Sugar Use

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Flexible solutions accounted for 88.32% of the sugar packaging market in 2025 and are expanding at a 4.62% CAGR through 2031. Bags and pouches drive volume, yet sachets are steadily gaining share in quick-service restaurants and hospitality channels. Rigid containers remain niche, catering to premium organic sugars and foodservice dispensers where clarity and reuse offset higher shipment costs. Sealed Air's recyclable polyethylene pouch with an integrated degassing valve prevents ballooning in humid climates, reducing retailer returns and validating the format's premium positioning. In contrast, sacks are ceding space to intermediate bulk containers where automated handling favors rigid formats, underscoring how material handling innovation influences the trajectory of the sugar packaging market.

Rigid packaging's lower 3.1% CAGR stems from concentration in mature markets and consumer price sensitivity, yet glass jars are enjoying a limited revival in European organic channels associating transparency with purity. Flexible formats, however, are likely to retain leadership because lightweighting, resealable features, and omnichannel durability remain highly valued by retailers and consumers alike. Consequently, the sugar packaging market is expected to see continued investment in film science and closure innovation.

Plastic retained 68.97% sugar packaging market share in 2025, split between woven polypropylene for bulk and multilayer laminates for retail. Yet bio-based and compostable substrates are growing fastest at 5.22% CAGR, driven by retailer scorecards and consumer sustainability preferences. Paper packaging also edges higher as kraft pouches with biodegradable liners satisfy both visual and environmental expectations, especially in European premium segments. Billerud's grease-resistant laminate passed EU Regulation 10/2011, demonstrating that paper can meet safety standards without plastics, though price premiums keep adoption selective.

Smurfit WestRock's joint venture with GranBio aims to commercialize bagasse-derived polyethylene at scale, targeting cost parity with fossil-based resin by 2029. Until then, polyethylene and polypropylene films will dominate because they deliver proven moisture barriers at lower weights, minimizing logistics costs. Nonetheless, retailer mandates suggest that bio-based films will capture incremental share, sustaining innovation demand within the sugar packaging industry.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Packaging Type
  • Flexible Packaging
    • Bags and Pouches
    • Sachets
    • Sacks
  • Rigid Packaging
    • Jars and Containers
• By Material Type
  • Plastic
    • Woven Polypropylene
    • Plastic Films
  • Paper
  • Bio-based and Compostable Materials
• By Packaging Size
  • Less than equal to 1 kg
  • 2 - 5 kg
  • 5 - 25 kg
  • More than 25 kg
• By End User
  • Large Scale Manufacturers
  • Medium Scale Manufacturers
  • Small Scale Manufacturers
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia -Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Turkey
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Nigeria
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific held 40.21% of the market share in 2025 and is expected to grow at an estimated 4.1% CAGR through 2031. India's mandated iron-fortified sugar program drives demand for high-barrier films, while China's blockchain adoption in premium segments differentiates products on safety credentials. Southeast Asia is transitioning rapidly from loose bulk to retail packs as urbanization accelerates. Japan's aging demographics are pushing brands to engineer easy-open closures and smaller formats, underscoring diverse regional needs that are expanding the sugar packaging market.

The Middle East and Africa region posts the highest forecast at 5.32% CAGR. Saudi Arabia enforces tamper-evident packaging on imports, spurring holographic labels and breakable seals that local converters often cannot supply, thereby opening export opportunities for European and Asian suppliers. Nigeria's sugar consumption reached 1.8 million metric tons in 2025, but domestic packaging capacity trails demand, promoting foreign investment. Currency volatility, such as Egypt's 2025 devaluation, alters substrate choices, favoring lower-cost paper sacks in industrial channels and reshaping the sugar packaging market across the region.

In Europe, growth is muted by declining sugar use but buoyed by sustainability mandates. Germany raised EPR fees on non-recyclable packs, accelerating the switch to mono-material polyethylene. France's ban on single-use plastic sachets creates uncertainty, prompting brands to hedge with paper alternatives. Closed-loop recycling pilots in Spain and Italy demonstrate the potential of the circular economy but depend on multi-stakeholder coordination. Regulatory complexity, therefore, defines the European outlook for the sugar packaging industry.

In North America, the United States relies on e-commerce to stimulate unit-pack demand, whereas Canada's draft EPR proposal diverges from U.S. rules, complicating cross-border compliance. Mexico's exporters use higher-barrier laminates to meet U.S. retailer shelf-life requirements. Overall, innovation skewed to resealability and graphics delivers incremental value in this mature part of the sugar packaging market.

South America is expected to be one of the growing regions, powered by Brazil's sugarcane-derived polyethylene supply and Argentina's stabilization of input costs. Mercosur tariff cuts on packaging materials cut production costs and encourage cross-border integration. Urban consumers in Sao Paulo and Buenos Aires increasingly prefer resealable pouches, while rural retail still leans on low-cost sacks. As bio-polymer capacity climbs, South America could become an exporting hub for sustainable inputs used worldwide in the sugar packaging market.

1. Mondi plc
2. Klabin S.A.
3. Coveris Holdings S.A.
4. United Bags Inc.
5. Smurfit WestRock
6. Amcor plc
7. Sealed Air Corporation
8. International Paper Company
9. TedPack Company Limited
10. Packman Industries
11. Swiss Pack Private Limited
12. Grupo Bio Pappel S.A.B. de C.V.
13. Stora Enso Oyj
14. Crown Holdings Inc.
15. Huhtamaki Oyj
16. Billerud AB
17. Glenroy Inc.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Steady Increase in Sugar Consumption in Emerging Economies
  • 4.2.2 Rising Demand for Customized and Sustainable Packaging Formats
  • 4.2.3 Growth of E-commerce Fueling Unit-Sized Sugar Packs
  • 4.2.4 Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Traceability for Premium Sugars
  • 4.2.5 Mandatory Sugar-Fortification Programs Requiring Specialized Packs
  • 4.2.6 Adoption of Biodegradable High-Barrier Films in Humid Regions
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Operational and Regulatory Compliance Costs for Converters
  • 4.3.2 Volatility in Global Sugar Prices Impacting Packaging Demand
  • 4.3.3 Shift Toward Alternative Sweeteners Reducing Per-Capita Sugar Use
  • 4.3.4 Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Increasing Packaging Costs
• 4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitute Products
  • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
• 4.8 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
• 4.9 Investment Analysis

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Packaging Type
  • 5.1.1 Flexible Packaging
    • 5.1.1.1 Bags and Pouches
    • 5.1.1.2 Sachets
    • 5.1.1.3 Sacks
  • 5.1.2 Rigid Packaging
    • 5.1.2.1 Jars and Containers
• 5.2 By Material Type
  • 5.2.1 Plastic
    • 5.2.1.1 Woven Polypropylene
    • 5.2.1.2 Plastic Films
  • 5.2.2 Paper
  • 5.2.3 Bio-based and Compostable Materials
• 5.3 By Packaging Size
  • 5.3.1 Less than equal to 1 kg
  • 5.3.2 2 - 5 kg
  • 5.3.3 5 - 25 kg
  • 5.3.4 More than 25 kg
• 5.4 By End User
  • 5.4.1 Large Scale Manufacturers
  • 5.4.2 Medium Scale Manufacturers
  • 5.4.3 Small Scale Manufacturers
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 Asia -Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 India
    • 5.5.4.3 Japan
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.5.5.1.3 Turkey
      • 5.5.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.2 Egypt
      • 5.5.5.2.3 Nigeria
      • 5.5.5.2.4 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (Includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as Available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Mondi plc
  • 6.4.2 Klabin S.A.
  • 6.4.3 Coveris Holdings S.A.
  • 6.4.4 United Bags Inc.
  • 6.4.5 Smurfit WestRock
  • 6.4.6 Amcor plc
  • 6.4.7 Sealed Air Corporation
  • 6.4.8 International Paper Company
  • 6.4.9 TedPack Company Limited
  • 6.4.10 Packman Industries
  • 6.4.11 Swiss Pack Private Limited
  • 6.4.12 Grupo Bio Pappel S.A.B. de C.V.
  • 6.4.13 Stora Enso Oyj
  • 6.4.14 Crown Holdings Inc.
  • 6.4.15 Huhtamaki Oyj
  • 6.4.16 Billerud AB
  • 6.4.17 Glenroy Inc.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment