코어 재료 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the core materials market size was valued at USD 2.23 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 2.46 billion in 2026 to reach USD 4.05 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 10.45% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

Global Core Materials Market Trends and Insights

Lightweighting Requirements Across Composite Structures

The core materials market benefits when manufacturers need lighter structures without reducing stiffness or durability. Sandwich structures can reduce structural mass by 30%-50% compared with monolithic laminates that offer equivalent stiffness, which supports their use in larger mobility structures. Composite panels are used in electric vehicle battery enclosures, rail interiors, marine hulls, and aircraft components where weight affects operating efficiency. Research on optimized sandwich cores for unmanned aerial vehicles found improvements in energy absorption and crashworthiness compared with a heavier monolithic design. The performance benefit becomes more relevant as structures become larger, particularly in offshore blades and wide-body aircraft components. Recycled polyethylene terephthalate foam and thermoplastic cores add a circular material option, while retaining the structural function that makes sandwich construction useful.

Expansion of Wind Turbine Blade Dimensions

The core materials market gains demand when turbine blades become longer because larger shells require more stiff, lower-density material. Commercial offshore turbines use blades longer than 115 meters, and future platforms are planned with blade lengths of 120-135 meters. Each additional meter of blade span increases bending loads and raises the need for carefully designed core placement in shells and shear webs. The Gurit 98m reference blade model showed that optimized recycled polyethylene terephthalate core layouts can maintain buckling margins while reducing core mass. Gurit Holding AG announced a CHF 250 million (approximately USD 275-283 million) five-year agreement in January 2026 to supply core material kits using its OptiCore design approach, which placed blade weight reduction and production efficiency at the center of the contract. The agreement shows that wind customers are considering engineered geometry and processing benefits alongside material price.

High Qualification and Certification Costs

Aerospace core materials can require years of development and substantial testing before they are approved for a certified aircraft. Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 20-107B and European Union Aviation Safety Agency Acceptable Means of Compliance 20-29 use a building-block approach that moves from coupons to full-scale structures. The requirements make it difficult for new suppliers to enter aerospace programs quickly. Shared material databases can reduce duplicated work, but suppliers still need a documented manufacturing process and approval under customer-specific specifications. Aerospace customers also expect recognized quality systems, including AS9100D and National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program accreditation. These requirements can delay the use of newer thermoplastic and bio-based core options even when their performance is suitable.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Aircraft Production and Composite Airframe Penetration
2. Electrification and Commercial-Transport Weight Reduction
3. Polymer Precursor and Raw-Material Price Volatility

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Foam accounted for 49.45% of the core materials market revenue in 2025. It serves applications from cost-sensitive marine and construction panels to autoclave-capable polymethacrylimide grades used in aerospace structures. The category includes polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene terephthalate, polyurethane, styrene-acrylonitrile, and polymethacrylimide materials. Polyethylene terephthalate foam is gaining use in wind blades because it offers consistent mechanical properties and can support recycling objectives. ARMACELL stated that its ArmaPET range had converted 5 billion recycled polyethylene terephthalate bottles into structural foam cores during 20 years of commercial production. Balsa remains useful where high compressive strength relative to weight and lower processing cost are important, although traceability and forestry certification add procurement requirements.

Honeycomb is projected to advance at an 11.74% CAGR through 2031. Aerospace cabin panels, floor panels, nacelles, and other lightweight structures support demand for aluminum, aramid-paper, and polymer honeycomb. Hexcel Corporation offers more than 700 HexWeb honeycomb variants and operates a facility in Casablanca, Morocco, that supports aerospace supply chains. Evonik Industries AG presented new ROHACELL in-mold foaming products at the Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (SAMPE) 2026 for thick-section aerospace and urban air mobility applications. These products can reduce waste by integrating the core during automated manufacturing. EconCore N.V.'s thermoplastic honeycomb technology is also directed at recyclable, fire-safe panels for aircraft interiors, which creates a path away from conventional thermoset aramid solutions.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Type
  • Foam
  • Balsa
  • Honeycomb
• By End-Use Industry
  • Wind Energy
  • Aerospace and Defense
  • Marine
  • Automotive
  • Construction and Industrial
  • Other End-use Industries
• By Geography
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • ASEAN Countries
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • NORDIC Countries
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific held 38.12% of the core materials market revenue in 2025 and is projected to advance at an 11.56% CAGR through 2031. China's blade manufacturing base supports demand for foam, balsa, and engineered core kits. India's wind capacity target of 140 gigawatts by 2030 adds a further source of regional demand. Japan and South Korea support quality-focused applications in marine structures, rail interiors, and aerospace-related manufacturing. Southeast Asian countries are becoming additional demand centers as electric vehicle assembly and renewable infrastructure expand.

China's blade manufacturers are establishing facilities in Southeast Asia to serve local projects and supply export markets. This development supports a more integrated regional supply chain for the core materials market. North America and Europe remain important because of their aerospace manufacturing bases and offshore wind programs. Airbus and Boeing production plans support demand for aerospace honeycomb from Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers. Europe's recycling requirements for wind blades support interest in polyethylene terephthalate foam and polypropylene honeycomb alternatives. Ecuador and Papua New Guinea are important supply locations for balsa, even though much of the demand is in other regions.

The Middle East and Africa represent a smaller part of the core materials market, but renewable energy projects and aerospace manufacturing are creating targeted opportunities. Saudi Arabia's wind plans and South Africa's renewable procurement program can support the use of composite panels in turbine nacelles and civil structures. Morocco has developed an aerospace cluster in the MidParc Free Trade Zone. Hexcel Corporation's Casablanca facility serves nearby Airbus, Safran, and Bombardier operations and reflects the value of locating close to aerospace customers. The region can benefit from supplier investment that follows aircraft production diversification. Its growth prospects depend on the pace of renewable project execution and aerospace supply-chain expansion.

1. 3A Composites GmbH
2. ARMACELL
3. Carbon-Core Corp.
4. Changzhou Tiansheng New Materials Co., Ltd.
5. Diab Group
6. EconCore N.V.
7. EURO-COMPOSITES
8. Evonik Industries AG
9. Gurit Holding AG
10. Hexcel Corporation
11. Lantor BV
12. Maricell S.r.l.
13. NMG EUROPE SRL
14. Plascore, Inc.
15. Polyumac USA, LLC

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Lightweighting Requirements Across Composite Structures
  • 4.2.2 Expansion of Wind Turbine Blade Dimensions
  • 4.2.3 Aircraft Production and Composite Airframe Penetration
  • 4.2.4 Electrification and Commercial-Transport Weight Reduction
  • 4.2.5 Recycled PET and Thermoplastic Core Adoption
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High Qualification and Certification Costs
  • 4.3.2 Polymer Precursor and Raw-Material Price Volatility
  • 4.3.3 End-of-Life Recycling Constraints for Thermoset Sandwich Structures
• 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.5.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Type
  • 5.1.1 Foam
  • 5.1.2 Balsa
  • 5.1.3 Honeycomb
• 5.2 By End-Use Industry
  • 5.2.1 Wind Energy
  • 5.2.2 Aerospace and Defense
  • 5.2.3 Marine
  • 5.2.4 Automotive
  • 5.2.5 Construction and Industrial
  • 5.2.6 Other End-use Industries
• 5.3 By Geography
  • 5.3.1 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.3.1.1 China
    • 5.3.1.2 India
    • 5.3.1.3 Japan
    • 5.3.1.4 South Korea
    • 5.3.1.5 ASEAN Countries
    • 5.3.1.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.3.2 North America
    • 5.3.2.1 United States
    • 5.3.2.2 Canada
    • 5.3.2.3 Mexico
  • 5.3.3 Europe
    • 5.3.3.1 Germany
    • 5.3.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.3.3.3 France
    • 5.3.3.4 Italy
    • 5.3.3.5 NORDIC Countries
    • 5.3.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.3.4 South America
    • 5.3.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.3.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.3.4.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.3.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.3.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.3.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.3.5.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share (%)/Ranking Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Overview, Market Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 3A Composites GmbH
  • 6.4.2 ARMACELL
  • 6.4.3 Carbon-Core Corp.
  • 6.4.4 Changzhou Tiansheng New Materials Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4.5 Diab Group
  • 6.4.6 EconCore N.V.
  • 6.4.7 EURO-COMPOSITES
  • 6.4.8 Evonik Industries AG
  • 6.4.9 Gurit Holding AG
  • 6.4.10 Hexcel Corporation
  • 6.4.11 Lantor BV
  • 6.4.12 Maricell S.r.l.
  • 6.4.13 NMG EUROPE SRL
  • 6.4.14 Plascore, Inc.
  • 6.4.15 Polyumac USA, LLC

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment