구조안전모니터링 시장 예측(-2030년) : 컴포넌트별, 유형별, 실장 방법별, 용도별, 최종사용자별, 지역별 세계 분석

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Structural Health Monitoring Market is accounted for $3.14 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach $11.79 billion by 2030 growing at a CAGR of 20.8% during the forecast period. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is a proactive approach to assessing the condition of infrastructure such as bridges, buildings, and pipelines in real-time or periodically. It involves the use of sensors, data analysis techniques, and predictive algorithms to detect damage, degradation, or abnormalities in structures. By continuously monitoring key parameters like strain, vibration, and temperature, SHM aims to identify potential issues before they escalate, thereby enhancing safety, reducing maintenance costs, and extending the lifespan of assets. SHM systems can be wired or wireless, and they provide valuable insights into structural performance, aiding in informed decision-making for maintenance and repairs. Its applications range from civil engineering to aerospace, offering a comprehensive solution for ensuring the integrity and reliability of critical infrastructure.

According to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in the U.S., more than 30.0% of structures, including bridges and dams, have surpassed their 50 years of infrastructure design life.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Need for asset management

Asset management is a key driver of the structural health monitoring market due to its crucial role in optimizing the performance and longevity of infrastructure assets. By implementing SHM solutions, asset managers can proactively monitor the health and integrity of structures such as bridges, buildings, and dams in real-time. This proactive approach enables timely detection of structural issues, minimizes maintenance costs, and enhances safety. Additionally, SHM facilitates data-driven decision-making, enabling asset managers to prioritize repairs and allocate resources efficiently. Overall, integrating SHM into asset management strategies helps organizations ensure the reliability and resilience of their infrastructure assets.

Restraint:

Complexity

The complexity restraint refers to challenges arising from the intricate nature of implementing monitoring systems in diverse structural environments. This encompasses factors such as varying structural designs, material compositions, and operational conditions. Managing this complexity requires robust sensor technologies, sophisticated data analytics, and adaptable monitoring strategies. Additionally, integration with existing infrastructure and compatibility with different architectural styles add layers of intricacy. Overcoming these complexities demands innovative approaches, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous advancements in SHM technology to ensure accurate and reliable structural assessments.

Opportunity:

Emerging applications in aerospace and defense

SHM technology offers real-time monitoring of structural integrity, which is crucial for ensuring safety and efficiency in aerospace and defense operations. In these sectors, where even minor structural defects can have catastrophic consequences, SHM provides proactive maintenance, reducing downtime and maintenance costs. Moreover, with the growing complexity of aerospace structures and the increasing demand for autonomous systems, SHM plays a pivotal role in ensuring continuous operation and mission success. This presents a ripe market for advanced SHM solutions tailored to the unique requirements of aerospace and defense applications, fostering innovation and investment in the sector.

Threat:

High initial costs

The high initial cost threats are the significant upfront investment required to implement SHM systems. These costs encompass purchasing sensors, data acquisition systems, software, installation, and ongoing maintenance. For potential clients, especially in sectors like civil infrastructure or aerospace, these expenses can act as a barrier to adoption, deterring them from investing in SHM solutions despite their long-term benefits. Addressing this threat requires SHM providers to emphasize the cost-effectiveness and long-term savings of their systems, offer flexible pricing models, and continually innovate to lower the entry costs for prospective clients.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the structural health monitoring market. Initially, there was a slowdown in projects due to supply chain disruptions and construction halts, leading to a dip in demand for SHM systems. However, as industries adapted to remote monitoring solutions, there emerged a heightened awareness of the importance of SHM in ensuring infrastructure safety. This awareness has driven investments in SHM technologies, particularly in sectors like transportation, energy, and civil engineering, as authorities seek to prevent future disruptions and ensure the resilience of critical infrastructure.

The software segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The software segment within the structural health monitoring market has seen significant growth due to several factors. Advancements in sensor technology have led to an increase in data collection, necessitating sophisticated software solutions for processing and analysis. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms has enhanced the capabilities of SHM software in detecting and predicting structural issues with greater accuracy. Furthermore, as infrastructure ages and safety regulations become more stringent, the adoption of SHM software is expected to continue its upward trajectory.

The bridges and dams segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

The growth in the Bridges and Dams segment of the Structural Health Monitoring market is primarily driven by increasing concerns about the aging infrastructure worldwide. Governments and organizations are investing significantly in monitoring systems to ensure the safety and integrity of bridges and dams. Advanced sensor technologies, such as fiber optics and wireless systems, are being deployed to provide real-time data on the structural health of bridges and dams, leading to proactive maintenance and risk mitigation strategies. Additionally, the adoption of SHM solutions is being accelerated by stringent safety regulations and the need to minimize downtime and repair costs associated with structural failures.

Region with largest share:

The structural health monitoring market in North America has experienced significant growth due to increasing investments in infrastructure projects, such as bridges, dams, and buildings, which has driven the demand for SHM systems to ensure safety and longevity. Stringent regulations and standards regarding structural safety have propelled the adoption of SHM technologies across various industries. Additionally, advancements in sensor technology, data analytics, and wireless communication have made SHM systems more efficient and cost-effective, further fueling market expansion. Moreover, growing awareness about the benefits of predictive maintenance and real-time monitoring has encouraged organizations to invest in SHM solutions.

Region with highest CAGR:

The Asia-Pacific region has witnessed significant growth due to rapid urbanization and infrastructural development across countries like China, India, and Southeast Asian nations which led to increased demand for SHM systems to ensure the safety and integrity of buildings, bridges, and other critical infrastructure. Moreover, the region's susceptibility to natural disasters like earthquakes has heightened the need for advanced monitoring solutions, government initiatives focusing on enhancing infrastructure resilience and safety standards have further propelled market growth. The emergence of advanced technologies and the growing adoption of wireless sensor networks have also contributed to the expansion of the SHM market in the Asia Pacific.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Structural Health Monitoring market include Campbell Scientific, Inc., Cowi A/S, Digi-Texx, Geocomp, Inc., Geokon, GeoSIG Ltd, James Fisher and Sons plc., Kinemetrics, National Instruments Corp., Nova Ventures Group, Sixense, Structural Monitoring Systems Plc and Xylem.

Key Developments:

In April 2024, Xylem introduces new mobile technology that will help water utilities meet compliance requirements for emerging drinking water contaminants such as PFAS. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) passed new regulations for Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for PFAS related contaminants in drinking water on April 10, 2024. Meeting new requirements can often lead to the implementation of new equipment. Xylem and Evoqua, now one company, have developed the MitiGATOR Mobile System that aims at filtering out new contaminants such as PFAS.

Components Covered:

• Hardware
• Software
• Service
• Other Components

Types Covered:

• Wired Systems
• Wireless Systems

Implementation Methods Covered:

• Retrofitting
• New Construction

Applications Covered:

• Airframes and Wind Turbines
• Bridges and Dams
• Building and Stadiums
• Large Machines and Equipment
• Vessels and Platforms
• Other Applications

End Users Covered:

• Mining
• Aerospace and Defense
• Civil Infrastructure
• Other End Users

Regions Covered:

• North America
  • US
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • UK
  • Italy
  • France
  • Spain
  • Rest of Europe
• Asia Pacific
  • Japan
  • China
  • India
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Korea
  • Rest of Asia Pacific
• South America
  • Argentina
  • Brazil
  • Chile
  • Rest of South America
• Middle East & Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • Qatar
  • South Africa
  • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

• Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
• Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
• Covers Market data for the years 2021, 2022, 2023, 2026, and 2030
• Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
• Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
• Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
• Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
• Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

• Company Profiling
  • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
  • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
• Regional Segmentation
  • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
• Competitive Benchmarking
  • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

• 2.1 Abstract
• 2.2 Stake Holders
• 2.3 Research Scope
• 2.4 Research Methodology
  • 2.4.1 Data Mining
  • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
  • 2.4.3 Data Validation
  • 2.4.4 Research Approach
• 2.5 Research Sources
  • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
  • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
  • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

• 3.1 Introduction
• 3.2 Drivers
• 3.3 Restraints
• 3.4 Opportunities
• 3.5 Threats
• 3.6 Application Analysis
• 3.7 End User Analysis
• 3.8 Emerging Markets
• 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

• 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
• 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
• 4.3 Threat of substitutes
• 4.4 Threat of new entrants
• 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Component

• 5.1 Introduction
• 5.2 Hardware
  • 5.2.1 Data Acquisition Systems
  • 5.2.2 Sensors
  • 5.2.3 Other Hardwares
• 5.3 Software
  • 5.3.1 Parameter Identification and Tracking
  • 5.3.2 Design and Analysis
  • 5.3.3 Other Softwares
• 5.4 Service
  • 5.4.1 Design and Consulting Service
  • 5.4.2 Installation Service
  • 5.4.3 Operation and Maintenance Service
  • 5.4.4 Other Services
• 5.5 Other Components

6 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Type

• 6.1 Introduction
• 6.2 Wired Systems
• 6.3 Wireless Systems

7 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Implementation Method

• 7.1 Introduction
• 7.2 Retrofitting
• 7.3 New Construction

8 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Application

• 8.1 Introduction
• 8.2 Airframes and Wind Turbines
• 8.3 Bridges and Dams
• 8.4 Building and Stadiums
• 8.5 Large Machines and Equipment
• 8.6 Vessels and Platforms
• 8.7 Other Applications

9 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By End User

• 9.1 Introduction
• 9.2 Mining
• 9.3 Aerospace and Defense
• 9.4 Civil Infrastructure
• 9.5 Other End Users

10 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Geography

• 10.1 Introduction
• 10.2 North America
  • 10.2.1 US
  • 10.2.2 Canada
  • 10.2.3 Mexico
• 10.3 Europe
  • 10.3.1 Germany
  • 10.3.2 UK
  • 10.3.3 Italy
  • 10.3.4 France
  • 10.3.5 Spain
  • 10.3.6 Rest of Europe
• 10.4 Asia Pacific
  • 10.4.1 Japan
  • 10.4.2 China
  • 10.4.3 India
  • 10.4.4 Australia
  • 10.4.5 New Zealand
  • 10.4.6 South Korea
  • 10.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
• 10.5 South America
  • 10.5.1 Argentina
  • 10.5.2 Brazil
  • 10.5.3 Chile
  • 10.5.4 Rest of South America
• 10.6 Middle East & Africa
  • 10.6.1 Saudi Arabia
  • 10.6.2 UAE
  • 10.6.3 Qatar
  • 10.6.4 South Africa
  • 10.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

11 Key Developments

• 11.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
• 11.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
• 11.3 New Product Launch
• 11.4 Expansions
• 11.5 Other Key Strategies

12 Company Profiling

• 12.1 Campbell Scientific, Inc.
• 12.2 Cowi A/S
• 12.3 Digi-Texx
• 12.4 Geocomp, Inc.
• 12.5 Geokon
• 12.6 GeoSIG Ltd
• 12.7 James Fisher and Sons plc.
• 12.8 Kinemetrics
• 12.9 National Instruments Corp
• 12.10 Nova Ventures Group
• 12.11 Sixense
• 12.12 Structural Monitoring Systems Plc
• 12.13 Xylem