시장보고서
상품코드
1785373

세계의 제로 트러스트 아키텍처 시장 : 산업 규모, 점유율, 동향, 기회, 예측, 부문별, 업계별, 지역별, 경쟁별(2020-2030년)

Zero Trust Architecture Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Component, By Deployment, By Vertical, By Region & Competition, 2020-2030F

발행일: | 리서치사: TechSci Research | 페이지 정보: 영문 185 Pages | 배송안내 : 2-3일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




※ 본 상품은 영문 자료로 한글과 영문 목차에 불일치하는 내용이 있을 경우 영문을 우선합니다. 정확한 검토를 위해 영문 목차를 참고해주시기 바랍니다.

세계의 제로 트러스트 아키텍처 시장 규모는 2024년에 185억 5,000만 달러로 평가되었고, 2030년에는 469억 4,000만 달러에 달할 것으로 예측되며, 2030년까지의 CAGR은 16.73%를 나타낼 전망입니다.

시장 개요
예측 기간 2026-2030년
시장 규모 : 2024년 185억 5,000만 달러
시장 규모 : 2030년 469억 4,000만 달러
CAGR(2025-2030년) 16.73%
급성장 부문 BFSI
최대 시장 북미

기존의 경계 기반 보안 모델과 달리, 제로 트러스트 아키텍처는 조직의 네트워크 내부 또는 외부에 상관없이 사용자나 장치가 본질적으로 신뢰할 수 있다고 가정하지 않습니다. 모든 액세스 요청은 지속적으로 인증, 승인 및 암호화되어 공격 표면을 크게 줄입니다. 조직이 클라우드 서비스, 원격 근무 및 BYOD(Bring-Your-Own-Device) 환경을 채택함에 따라 제로 트러스트는 복잡한 하이브리드 인프라를 보호하기 위한 확장 가능하고 적응력 있는 프레임워크를 제공합니다.

증가하는 사이버 위협과 데이터 침해는 시장 성장의 주요 요인입니다. ID, 엔드포인트 및 데이터를 표적으로 하는 공격이 증가함에 따라 조직은 사전 예방적인 보안 모델로 전환하고 있습니다. GDPR, HIPAA 및 CCPA와 같은 규제 의무도 기업들이 제로 트러스트와 같은 보다 엄격한 보안 프레임워크를 채택하도록 밀어붙이고 있습니다. 금융 서비스, 의료, 소매 및 제조를 포함한 다양한 업종의 기업들이 사용자 ID, 네트워크, 용도 및 데이터를 보호하기 위해 제로 트러스트 원칙을 빠르게 통합하고 있습니다. 또한 디지털 전환 이니셔티브와 분산된 인력으로 인해 기존 보안 경계가 무의미해지면서 제로 트러스트 도입의 필요성이 가속화되고 있습니다.

전 세계 제로 트러스트 아키텍처 시장은 혁신과 사이버 보안에 대한 투자 증가에 힘입어 강력한 성장을 보일 것으로 예상됩니다. 공급업체들은 다중 요소 인증, 마이크로 세분화, ID 및 액세스 관리, 엔드포인트 보안, 실시간 분석을 결합한 통합 제로 트러스트 플랫폼을 개발하고 있습니다. 클라우드 기반 제로 트러스트 솔루션은 확장성과 전개 용이성으로 인해 주목을 받고 있습니다. 기업들이 사이버 보안 태세를 강화하고 내부 위협을 줄이려고 함에 따라 제로 트러스트 아키텍처에 대한 수요는 기하급수적으로 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다. 인공 지능 및 머신 러닝의 지속적인 발전은 적응형 액세스 제어 및 실시간 위협 탐지를 더욱 지원하여 진화하는 디지털 미래에서 제로 트러스트를 기본 보안 전략으로 확고히 할 것입니다.

시장 성장 촉진요인

신원 및 데이터를 표적으로 하는 사이버 보안 위협의 증가

주요 시장 과제

레거시 인프라와의 통합의 복잡성

주요 시장 동향

신원 중심 보안 프레임워크의 채택 증가

목차

제1장 솔루션 개요

  • 시장의 정의
  • 시장 범위
    • 대상 시장
    • 조사 대상 연도
    • 주요 시장 세분화

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 고객의 목소리

제5장 세계의 제로 트러스트 아키텍처 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모와 예측
    • 금액별
  • 시장 점유율 및 예측
    • 컴포넌트별(솔루션, 서비스)
    • 전개별(온프레미스, 클라우드)
    • 업계별(은행, 금융서비스 및 보험(BFSI), IT 및 ITES, 에너지 및 유틸리티, 정부 및 방위, 의료, 기타)
    • 지역별(북미, 유럽, 남미, 중동 및 아프리카, 아시아태평양)
  • 기업별(2024년)
  • 시장 맵

제6장 북미의 제로 트러스트 아키텍처 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모와 예측
  • 시장 점유율 및 예측
  • 북미 : 국가별 분석
    • 미국
    • 캐나다
    • 멕시코

제7장 유럽의 제로 트러스트 아키텍처 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모와 예측
  • 시장 점유율 및 예측
  • 유럽 : 국가별 분석
    • 독일
    • 프랑스
    • 영국
    • 이탈리아
    • 스페인

제8장 아시아태평양의 제로 트러스트 아키텍처 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모와 예측
  • 시장 점유율 및 예측
  • 아시아태평양 : 국가별 분석
    • 중국
    • 인도
    • 일본
    • 한국
    • 호주

제9장 중동 및 아프리카의 제로 트러스트 아키텍처 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모와 예측
  • 시장 점유율 및 예측
  • 중동 및 아프리카 : 국가별 분석
    • 사우디아라비아
    • 아랍에미리트(UAE)
    • 남아프리카

제10장 남미의 제로 트러스트 아키텍처 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모와 예측
  • 시장 점유율 및 예측
  • 남미 : 국가별 분석
    • 브라질
    • 콜롬비아
    • 아르헨티나

제11장 시장 역학

  • 성장 촉진요인
  • 과제

제12장 시장 동향과 발전

  • 합병과 인수
  • 제품 출시
  • 최근 동향

제13장 기업 프로파일

  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • Zscaler, Inc.
  • Okta, Inc.
  • IBM Corporation
  • Broadcom Inc.
  • Google LLC

제14장 전략적 제안

제15장 기업 소개와 면책사항

HBR 25.08.13

Global Zero Trust Architecture Market was valued at USD 18.55 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 46.94 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 16.73% through 2030.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2026-2030
Market Size 2024USD 18.55 Billion
Market Size 2030USD 46.94 Billion
CAGR 2025-203016.73%
Fastest Growing SegmentBFSI
Largest MarketNorth America

Unlike traditional perimeter-based security models, Zero Trust Architecture assumes no user or device is inherently trustworthy, whether inside or outside the organization's network. Every access request is continuously authenticated, authorized, and encrypted, significantly reducing the attack surface. As organizations adopt cloud services, remote work, and bring-your-own-device environments, Zero Trust offers a scalable and adaptive framework to secure complex, hybrid infrastructures.

Rising cyber threats and data breaches are major contributors to the market's growth. With increased attacks targeting identity, endpoints, and data, organizations are shifting toward proactive security models. Regulatory mandates such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA also push enterprises to adopt tighter security frameworks like Zero Trust. Companies across verticals including financial services, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing are rapidly integrating Zero Trust principles to secure user identities, networks, applications, and data. Furthermore, digital transformation initiatives and distributed workforces have made traditional security perimeters obsolete, accelerating the need for Zero Trust adoption.

The Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is expected to see strong growth driven by innovation and increasing investment in cybersecurity. Vendors are developing integrated Zero Trust platforms that combine multi-factor authentication, micro-segmentation, identity and access management, endpoint security, and real-time analytics. Cloud-based Zero Trust solutions are gaining traction due to their scalability and ease of deployment. As enterprises look to strengthen their cybersecurity posture and reduce insider threats, the demand for Zero Trust Architecture is anticipated to grow exponentially. Continuous advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning will further support adaptive access control and real-time threat detection, solidifying Zero Trust as a foundational security strategy in the evolving digital landscape.

Key Market Drivers

Escalating Cybersecurity Threats Targeting Identities and Data

The modern threat landscape is characterized by increasingly targeted attacks-such as credential theft, lateral movement, ransomware, and supply chain exploits-that do not respect traditional network perimeters. Organizations are recognizing that perimeter-based defenses are insufficient when adversaries can bypass firewalls or exploit trusted insiders. Zero Trust architecture addresses this by enforcing continuous verification of every access request, regardless of source or destination, ensuring that identities and data remain protected even in compromised environments.

With identity-based attacks accounting for a growing share of breaches, enterprises across financial, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors are adopting Zero Trust as a core shield. Continuous authentication, micro-segmentation, and least-privilege access policies limit the blast radius of incidents and enable controlled movement within the network. As cyber risk evolves, the rigor and adaptability of Zero Trust principles are compelling organizations to shift away from legacy access models. In 2024, around 76 percent of confirmed data breaches involved misuse or theft of credentials. This alarming figure highlights the failure of perimeter-based security models and underscores the urgency for organizations to implement Zero Trust frameworks that enforce continuous identity verification and access validation at every point across their digital infrastructure.

Key Market Challenges

Complexity in Integration with Legacy Infrastructure

One of the most pressing challenges hindering the widespread adoption of Zero Trust Architecture in the global market is the complexity associated with integrating it into existing legacy infrastructure. Most organizations, especially large enterprises and public institutions, operate on decades-old networks and systems that were never designed with Zero Trust principles in mind. Retrofitting these systems requires meticulous reconfiguration of access protocols, identity management layers, network segmentation models, and endpoint visibility frameworks. This integration is not only time-consuming but also requires substantial capital investment, which becomes even more daunting for organizations dealing with outdated, unsupported, or heavily customized platforms. As a result, companies often struggle to migrate to a Zero Trust model without causing service disruptions or exposing themselves to interim vulnerabilities during the transition period.

The transition to Zero Trust Architecture demands a fundamental shift in how access and trust are managed across digital ecosystems. Unlike traditional perimeter-based models, Zero Trust assumes no implicit trust and requires continuous authentication, authorization, and validation at every access point. However, legacy systems were built on the principle of network-based trust, creating friction in aligning them with Zero Trust methodologies. Many of these systems lack support for modern authentication standards, making it difficult to establish identity-aware access control without major overhauls or custom integrations. Organizations also face skill gaps among their IT teams, who may not possess the specialized knowledge necessary to architect secure, scalable Zero Trust deployments. These factors collectively impede the pace of adoption, increase total cost of ownership, and deter organizations from fully embracing Zero Trust Architecture.

Key Market Trends

Rising Adoption of Identity-Centric Security Frameworks

A significant trend driving the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is the increasing emphasis on identity-centric security models. As organizations shift from perimeter-based defenses toward micro-segmented, identity-driven access control mechanisms, identity verification has become the foundational layer of Zero Trust implementation. Enterprises are integrating advanced identity and access management technologies to verify users, devices, and workloads before granting access to critical resources. These systems allow organizations to enforce contextual, risk-aware policies based on real-time identity attributes, location, behavior, and device posture.

This identity-centric approach is particularly valuable in hybrid and remote work environments, where the traditional corporate network boundary has dissolved. Enterprises can no longer rely on physical network segmentation alone. Instead, by prioritizing identity as the new perimeter, organizations can minimize lateral movement of threats and detect anomalous access patterns more effectively. Identity-centric frameworks also support regulatory compliance by ensuring traceability and policy enforcement across multi-cloud and distributed infrastructures. The global surge in identity breaches and credential-based attacks further underscores the importance of adopting identity-first Zero Trust strategies across public and private sectors.

Key Market Players

  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • Zscaler, Inc.
  • Okta, Inc.
  • IBM Corporation
  • Broadcom Inc.
  • Google LLC

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Component:

  • Solutions
  • Services

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Deployment:

  • On-Premises
  • Cloud

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Vertical:

  • BFSI
  • IT & ITES
  • Energy & Utilities
  • Government & Defense
  • Healthcare
  • Others

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Region:

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Spain
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Australia
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • South Africa
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Colombia
    • Argentina

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Zero Trust Architecture Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Solution Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Component (Solutions, Services)
    • 5.2.2. By Deployment (On-Premises, Cloud)
    • 5.2.3. By Vertical (BFSI, IT & ITES, Energy & Utilities, Government & Defense, Healthcare, Others)
    • 5.2.4. By Region (North America, Europe, South America, Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific)
  • 5.3. By Company (2024)
  • 5.4. Market Map

6. North America Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Component
    • 6.2.2. By Deployment
    • 6.2.3. By Vertical
    • 6.2.4. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
        • 6.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
    • 6.3.2. Canada Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
        • 6.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
    • 6.3.3. Mexico Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
        • 6.3.3.2.3. By Vertical

7. Europe Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Component
    • 7.2.2. By Deployment
    • 7.2.3. By Vertical
    • 7.2.4. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. Germany Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
        • 7.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
    • 7.3.2. France Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
        • 7.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
    • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
        • 7.3.3.2.3. By Vertical
    • 7.3.4. Italy Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By Deployment
        • 7.3.4.2.3. By Vertical
    • 7.3.5. Spain Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By Deployment
        • 7.3.5.2.3. By Vertical

8. Asia Pacific Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Component
    • 8.2.2. By Deployment
    • 8.2.3. By Vertical
    • 8.2.4. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
        • 8.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
    • 8.3.2. India Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
        • 8.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
    • 8.3.3. Japan Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
        • 8.3.3.2.3. By Vertical
    • 8.3.4. South Korea Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By Deployment
        • 8.3.4.2.3. By Vertical
    • 8.3.5. Australia Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By Deployment
        • 8.3.5.2.3. By Vertical

9. Middle East & Africa Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Component
    • 9.2.2. By Deployment
    • 9.2.3. By Vertical
    • 9.2.4. By Country
  • 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
        • 9.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
    • 9.3.2. UAE Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
        • 9.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
    • 9.3.3. South Africa Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
        • 9.3.3.2.3. By Vertical

10. South America Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Component
    • 10.2.2. By Deployment
    • 10.2.3. By Vertical
    • 10.2.4. By Country
  • 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. Brazil Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
        • 10.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
    • 10.3.2. Colombia Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
        • 10.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
    • 10.3.3. Argentina Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
        • 10.3.3.2.3. By Vertical

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends and Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Company Profiles

  • 13.1. Microsoft Corporation
    • 13.1.1. Business Overview
    • 13.1.2. Key Revenue and Financials
    • 13.1.3. Recent Developments
    • 13.1.4. Key Personnel
    • 13.1.5. Key Product/Services Offered
  • 13.2. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • 13.3. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • 13.4. Zscaler, Inc.
  • 13.5. Okta, Inc.
  • 13.6. IBM Corporation
  • 13.7. Broadcom Inc.
  • 13.8. Google LLC

14. Strategic Recommendations

15. About Us & Disclaimer

샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제