탄소 포집, 활용 및 저장 시장 : 서비스별, 기술별, 최종 이용 산업별, 지역별 예측(-2030년)

The carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) market is estimated at USD 5.82 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 17.75 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 25.0%. Capture services account for the largest share of the CCUS market since capturing CO2 is the most challenging, capital-intensive, and essential step in the value chain, the primary gateway anywhere that leads to utilization or storage activity. This demand formulation, being the costliest segment, requires heavy investments in specialized systems and technologies, such as post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel, not to mention its integration into existing industrial processes.

That is how capture services themselves generate the highest revenues for the CCUS sectors, and since there is no capture, the subsequent stages in CCUS cannot commence; therefore, demand is generated by such industries as power generation, cement, steel, and chemicals seeking to meet emissions targets, regulations, and attain low-carbon labels.

"Chemical loop is projected to be the fastest-growing form during the forecast period."

Chemical looping is the fastest growing technology that, through the improved energy efficiency and low operation cost in comparison to conventional capture processes, utilizes metal oxides to shuttle oxygen for fuel combustion and thus inherently separates CO2 without using solvent regeneration, which is very expensive. This is the reason why the technologies maintain a lower energy penalty; allow the integration of various fuels (such as coal, natural gas, and biomass); and are even enticing in cases where they can co-produce some of the valuable outputs like hydrogen for both power and industrial applications. The propensity for dramatic growth witnessed in R&D and pilot-to-commercial scale demonstrations, as well as its ability to meet stringent decarbonization goals, catalyzes its global adoption.

"The power generation segment is projected to register the second-highest growth rate during the forecast period."

The power generation segment is the second fastest-growing end-use sector in the CCUS market due to coal and gas-fired plants being large global CO2 sources and best candidates for retrofitting with capture equipment to comply with tightening climate policies and net-zero targets. Several governments provide significant incentives, tax credits, and funding schemes for decarbonizing electricity generation, whereas utilities are making investments in CCUS to keep existing assets viable and facilitate low-carbon baseload power together with renewables. Moreover, large-scale utilization of CCUS within power facilities delivers instantaneous, high-level emission cuts, promoting quick uptake compared to slower-developing industrial sources.

"Europe is projected to register the second-highest growth rate in the CCUS market during the forecast period."

Europe is anticipated to record the second-highest CAGR within the CCUS market by virtue of its aggressive climate policies, such as the EU Green Deal and legally binding 2050 net-zero targets, which are urging massive deployment of carbon capture initiatives in the power, cement, steel, and chemical sectors. The area is favored by robust state support, carbon pricing in the EU Emissions Trading System, and cooperative cross-border projects such as the Northern Lights and Porthos ventures that combine capture, transport, and storage facilities. Europe's established industrial base, supportive regulatory landscape, and low-carbon innovation focus provide a fertile breeding ground for explosive CCUS expansion.

This study has been validated through primary interviews with industry experts globally. The primary sources have been divided into the following three categories:

• By Company Type: Tier 1 - 40%; Tier 2 - 33%; and Tier 3 - 27%
• By Designation: C-level - 50%; Director-level - 30%; and Managers - 20%
• By Region: North America - 15%; Europe - 50%; Asia Pacific - 20%; the Middle East & Africa - 10%; and Latin America - 5%

The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the following companies:

Prominent companies in this market include Fluor Corporation (US), Exxon Mobil Corporation (US), Linde plc (UK), Shell Plc. (UK), Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Japan), JGC Holdings Corporation (Japan), Schlumberger Limited (US), Aker Solutions (Norway), Honeywell International (US), Equinor ASA (Norway), TotalEnergies SE (France), Hitachi Ltd (Japan), Siemens AG (Germany), GE Vernova (US), and Halliburton (US).

Research Coverage

This research report categorizes the CCUS market by service (capture, utilization, storage, transportation), technology (chemical looping, solvents & sorbents, membranes, others), end-use industry (oil & gas, power generation, chemical & petrochemical, cement, iron & steel, other end-use industries), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East & Africa, and South America). The scope of the report includes detailed information about the major factors influencing the growth of the CCUS market, such as drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities. A thorough examination of the key industry players has been conducted to provide insights into their business overview, solutions and services, key strategies, and recent developments in the CCUS market. This report includes a competitive analysis of upcoming startups in the CCUS market ecosystem.

Reasons to buy this report

The report will help market leaders/new entrants with information on the closest approximations of the revenue numbers for the overall CCUS market and the subsegments. This report will help stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights to better position their businesses and plan suitable go-to-market strategies. The report also helps stakeholders understand the pulse of the market and provides them with information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:

• Analysis of key drivers (growing focus on CO2 emissions, increasing demand for CO2 in EOR techniques), restraints (high cost of carbon capture and sequestration), opportunities (large number of upcoming projects in Asia Pacific), and challenges (high initial investments) are influencing the growth of the CCUS market.
• Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on upcoming technologies, research & development activities, and product launches in the CCUS market.
• Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative markets-the report analyses the CCUS market across varied regions.
• Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about services, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the CCUS market.
• Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, and product offerings of leading players like Fluor Corporation (US), Exxon Mobil Corporation (US), Linde plc (UK), Shell plc (UK), Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Japan), JGC Holdings Corporation (Japan), Schlumberger Limited (US), Aker Solutions (Norway), Honeywell International (US), Equinor ASA (Norway), TotalEnergies SE (France), Hitachi Ltd (Japan), Siemens AG (Germany), GE Vernova (US), and Halliburton (US).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
• 1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
• 1.3 STUDY SCOPE
  • 1.3.1 MARKETS COVERED AND REGIONS CONSIDERED
  • 1.3.2 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
  • 1.3.3 YEARS CONSIDERED
  • 1.3.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
  • 1.3.5 UNITS CONSIDERED
• 1.4 STAKEHOLDERS
• 1.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

• 2.1 RESEARCH DATA
  • 2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
    • 2.1.1.1 Key data from secondary sources
  • 2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
    • 2.1.2.1 Key data from primary sources
    • 2.1.2.2 Interviews with top service providers
    • 2.1.2.3 Breakdown of primary interviews with experts
    • 2.1.2.4 Key industry insights
• 2.2 BASE NUMBER CALCULATION
  • 2.2.1 APPROACH 1: SUPPLY-SIDE APPROACH
  • 2.2.2 APPROACH 2: DEMAND-SIDE APPROACH
• 2.3 GROWTH FORECAST
  • 2.3.1 SUPPLY SIDE
  • 2.3.2 DEMAND SIDE
• 2.4 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
  • 2.4.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
  • 2.4.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
• 2.5 DATA TRIANGULATION
• 2.6 FACTOR ANALYSIS
• 2.7 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
• 2.8 LIMITATIONS

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS

• 4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS IN CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET
• 4.2 CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET BY END-USE INDUSTRY AND REGION
• 4.3 CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET, BY SERVICE
• 4.4 CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY
• 4.5 CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET, BY END-USE INDUSTRY
• 4.6 CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET, BY COUNTRY

5 MARKET OVERVIEW

• 5.1 INTRODUCTION
• 5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS
  • 5.2.1 DRIVERS
    • 5.2.1.1 Growing focus on reducing CO2 emissions
    • 5.2.1.2 Increasing demand for CO2 in EOR techniques
    • 5.2.1.3 Rising environmental awareness to increase natural gas demand
  • 5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
    • 5.2.2.1 High cost of carbon capture and storage
    • 5.2.2.2 Safety concerns at storage sites
  • 5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
    • 5.2.3.1 Continuous investments in developing innovative capturing technologies
    • 5.2.3.2 Large number of upcoming projects in APAC
    • 5.2.3.3 Announcement of large-capacity hydrogen projects
  • 5.2.4 CHALLENGES
    • 5.2.4.1 Reducing CO2 capturing costs
    • 5.2.4.2 Transparency & credibility risks: measurement errors, greenwashing, and lobbying
• 5.3 PORTER'S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
  • 5.3.1 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
  • 5.3.2 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
  • 5.3.3 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
  • 5.3.4 THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
  • 5.3.5 INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
• 5.4 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING CRITERIA
  • 5.4.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
  • 5.4.2 BUYING CRITERIA
• 5.5 ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
• 5.6 PRICING ANALYSIS
  • 5.6.1 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE, BY KEY PLAYER
  • 5.6.2 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY REGION
• 5.7 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
• 5.8 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
  • 5.8.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
    • 5.8.1.1 Direct Capture Technologies
      • 5.8.1.1.1 Post-combustion Capture
      • 5.8.1.1.2 Pre-combustion Capture
      • 5.8.1.1.3 Oxy-fuel Combustion
      • 5.8.1.1.4 Direct Air Capture
    • 5.8.1.2 Transport Technologies
      • 5.8.1.2.1 Pipeline
      • 5.8.1.2.2 Ship-based
    • 5.8.1.3 Utilization Technologies
      • 5.8.1.3.1 Direct Utilization
      • 5.8.1.3.2 Mineralization
  • 5.8.2 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
    • 5.8.2.1 Gas Separation & Purification
    • 5.8.2.2 Liquefaction & Phase Change Technologies
• 5.9 IMPACT OF AI/GEN AI ON CCUS MARKET
  • 5.9.1 TOP USE CASES AND MARKET POTENTIAL
  • 5.9.2 CASE STUDIES OF AI IMPLEMENTATION IN CCUS MARKET
• 5.10 MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
  • 5.10.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 5.10.2 GDP TRENDS AND FORECAST
  • 5.10.3 TRENDS IN GLOBAL OIL & GAS INDUSTRY
• 5.11 PATENT ANALYSIS
  • 5.11.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 5.11.2 METHODOLOGY
  • 5.11.3 PATENT TYPES
  • 5.11.4 INSIGHTS
  • 5.11.5 LEGAL STATUS
  • 5.11.6 JURISDICTION ANALYSIS
  • 5.11.7 TOP APPLICANTS
• 5.12 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
  • 5.12.1 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
  • 5.12.2 STANDARDS IN CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET
• 5.13 KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS, 2025-2026
• 5.14 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
  • 5.14.1 CASE STUDY 1: SHELL QUEST CCS PROJECT
  • 5.14.2 CASE STUDY 2: PETRA NOVA CARBON CAPTURE PROJECT
  • 5.14.3 CASE STUDY 3: MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES PARTNERED WITH HEIDELBERG MATERIALS TO INTRODUCE CO2 CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES IN CEMENT SECTOR
• 5.15 TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS
• 5.16 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO
• 5.17 IMPACT OF 2025 US TARIFFS-CARBON, CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET
  • 5.17.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 5.17.2 KEY TARIFF RATES
  • 5.17.3 PRICE IMPACT ANALYSIS
  • 5.17.4 IMPACT ON COUNTRIES/REGIONS
    • 5.17.4.1 US
    • 5.17.4.2 Europe
    • 5.17.4.3 Asia Pacific
  • 5.17.5 IMPACT ON END-USE INDUSTRIES

6 CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET, BY SERVICE

• 6.1 INTRODUCTION
• 6.2 CAPTURE
  • 6.2.1 CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES
    • 6.2.1.1 Post-combustion
      • 6.2.1.1.1 Post-combustion offers high CO2 capture efficiency of 99%
    • 6.2.1.2 Oxy-fuel
      • 6.2.1.2.1 Simplified CO2 capture compared with conventional processes
    • 6.2.1.3 Pre-combustion
      • 6.2.1.3.1 Eliminates CO2 from gas stream before dilution with air or oxygen
    • 6.2.1.4 Bio-energy CCS (BECCS)
      • 6.2.1.4.1 Use of biomass to store carbon offers stability of more than 1,000 years
    • 6.2.1.5 Direct Air Capture
      • 6.2.1.5.1 Need for negative emission technology to promote development of DAC technology
• 6.3 TRANSPORTATION
  • 6.3.1 PIPELINE TO BE MOST PREFERRED MODE OF CO2 TRANSPORTATION
• 6.4 UTILIZATION
  • 6.4.1 EOR USING CO2 FROM CAPTURE PROCESSES TO INCREASE CO2 UTILIZATION
• 6.5 STORAGE
  • 6.5.1 GEOLOGICAL STORAGE TO BE MOST PREFERRED METHOD OF CO2 STORAGE
  • 6.5.2 STORAGE SERVICES, BY TECHNOLOGY
  • 6.5.3 GEOLOGICAL STORAGE
    • 6.5.3.1 Oil & gas reservoirs
      • 6.5.3.1.1 Oil & gas reservoirs offer most efficient storage
    • 6.5.3.2 Unmineable coal beds
      • 6.5.3.2.1 Further research required to optimize storage in coal beds
    • 6.5.3.3 Saline aquifers
      • 6.5.3.3.1 Less knowledge about saline aquifers' features compared to other storage types
  • 6.5.4 DEEP OCEAN STORAGE
    • 6.5.4.1 Low preference over geological storage due to associated environmental risks

7 CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY

• 7.1 INTRODUCTION
• 7.2 CHEMICAL LOOPING
  • 7.2.1 COST-EFFECTIVENESS TO DRIVE ADOPTION OF CHEMICAL LOOPING
• 7.3 SOLVENTS & SORBENTS
  • 7.3.1 HIGH CAPTURE RATE TO DRIVE DEMAND
• 7.4 MEMBRANES
  • 7.4.1 HIGHLY EFFICIENT CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY
• 7.5 OTHER TECHNOLOGIES

8 CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET, BY END-USE INDUSTRY

• 8.1 INTRODUCTION
• 8.2 OIL & GAS
  • 8.2.1 CO2 MOSTLY EXTRACTED FROM NATURAL GAS PLANTS
• 8.3 POWER GENERATION
  • 8.3.1 FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS SIGNIFICANTLY CONTRIBUTE TO MARKET GROWTH
• 8.4 CHEMICAL & PETROCHEMICAL
  • 8.4.1 AMMONIA PRODUCTION PLANTS CONTRIBUTE SIGNIFICANTLY TO MARKET
• 8.5 CEMENT
  • 8.5.1 GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS FORCING CEMENT INDUSTRY TO ADOPT CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY
• 8.6 IRON & STEEL
  • 8.6.1 STEEL INDUSTRY ACCOUNTS FOR LARGE SHARE OF ANTHROPOGENIC CO2 EMISSIONS
• 8.7 OTHER END-USE INDUSTRIES

9 CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE MARKET, BY REGION

• 9.1 INTRODUCTION
• 9.2 NORTH AMERICA
  • 9.2.1 US
    • 9.2.1.1 Government support for implementation of CCUS to drive market
  • 9.2.2 CANADA
    • 9.2.2.1 Carbon storage projects to drive CCUS market
  • 9.2.3 MEXICO
    • 9.2.3.1 Need for transportation of carbon to offshore storage facilities to drive market
• 9.3 EUROPE
  • 9.3.1 NORWAY
    • 9.3.1.1 Increase in natural gas demand for power generation to drive market
  • 9.3.2 UK
    • 9.3.2.1 New regulations announced by government to boost CCUS market growth
  • 9.3.3 FRANCE
    • 9.3.3.1 Announcement of new projects to boost market
  • 9.3.4 NETHERLANDS
    • 9.3.4.1 Transportation segment to grow fast owing to CATO-2 project in Netherlands
  • 9.3.5 ITALY
    • 9.3.5.1 Government regulations to push market growth
  • 9.3.6 REST OF EUROPE
• 9.4 ASIA PACIFIC
  • 9.4.1 CHINA
    • 9.4.1.1 Collaborations between Chinese government and companies and organizations to drive market
  • 9.4.2 JAPAN
    • 9.4.2.1 Availability of major technology providers and strong industrial base to support market growth
  • 9.4.3 INDIA
    • 9.4.3.1 Industrialization and emission regulations to drive market
  • 9.4.4 AUSTRALIA
    • 9.4.4.1 Transportation segment to witness high growth
  • 9.4.5 REST OF ASIA PACIFIC
• 9.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
  • 9.5.1 GCC COUNTRIES
    • 9.5.1.1 UAE
      • 9.5.1.1.1 Carbon utilization for EOR to drive market
    • 9.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
      • 9.5.1.2.1 Growing number of CCUS projects to drive market
    • 9.5.1.3 Rest of GCC Countries
  • 9.5.2 REST OF MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
• 9.6 SOUTH AMERICA
  • 9.6.1 BRAZIL
    • 9.6.1.1 Government initiatives to drive the market
  • 9.6.2 ARGENTINA
    • 9.6.2.1 Growing hydrocarbon sector to drive the market
  • 9.6.3 REST OF SOUTH AMERICA

10 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 10.1 OVERVIEW
• 10.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN
• 10.3 REVENUE ANALYSIS, 2020-2024
• 10.4 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS, 2024
• 10.5 BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
• 10.6 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
  • 10.6.1 STARS
  • 10.6.2 EMERGING LEADERS
  • 10.6.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
  • 10.6.4 PARTICIPANTS
  • 10.6.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
• 10.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES, 2024
  • 10.7.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
  • 10.7.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
  • 10.7.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
  • 10.7.4 STARTING BLOCKS
  • 10.7.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING OF KEY STARTUPS/SMES
    • 10.7.5.1 Detailed list of key startups/SMEs
    • 10.7.5.2 Competitive benchmarking of key startups/SMEs
• 10.8 VALUATION AND FINANCIAL METRICS
• 10.9 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
  • 10.9.1 DEALS
  • 10.9.2 EXPANSIONS

11 COMPANY PROFILES

• 11.1 KEY PLAYERS
  • 11.1.1 FLUOR CORPORATION
    • 11.1.1.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.1.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.1.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.1.3.1 Deals
      • 11.1.1.3.2 Other developments
    • 11.1.1.4 MnM view
      • 11.1.1.4.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.1.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.1.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.2 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
    • 11.1.2.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.2.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.2.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.2.3.1 Deals
      • 11.1.2.3.2 Expansions
      • 11.1.2.3.3 Other developments
    • 11.1.2.4 MnM view
      • 11.1.2.4.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.2.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.2.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.3 SHELL PLC
    • 11.1.3.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.3.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.3.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.3.3.1 Deals
    • 11.1.3.4 MnM view
      • 11.1.3.4.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.3.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.3.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.4 EQUINOR ASA
    • 11.1.4.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.4.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.4.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.4.3.1 Deals
      • 11.1.4.3.2 Other developments
    • 11.1.4.4 MnM view
      • 11.1.4.4.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.4.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.4.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.5 TOTALENERGIES SE
    • 11.1.5.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.5.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.5.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.5.3.1 Deals
    • 11.1.5.4 MnM view
      • 11.1.5.4.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.5.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.5.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.6 LINDE PLC
    • 11.1.6.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.6.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.6.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.6.3.1 Deals
  • 11.1.7 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
    • 11.1.7.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.7.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.7.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.7.3.1 Deals
      • 11.1.7.3.2 Expansions
      • 11.1.7.3.3 Other developments
  • 11.1.8 JGC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    • 11.1.8.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.8.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.8.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.8.3.1 Deals
  • 11.1.9 SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED
    • 11.1.9.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.9.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.9.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.9.3.1 Deals
  • 11.1.10 AKER SOLUTIONS
    • 11.1.10.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.10.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.10.3 Recent developments
  • 11.1.11 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
    • 11.1.11.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.11.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.11.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.11.3.1 Deals
  • 11.1.12 HITACHI, LTD.
    • 11.1.12.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.12.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.12.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.12.3.1 Deals
  • 11.1.13 SIEMENS AG
    • 11.1.13.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.13.2 Products offered
  • 11.1.14 GE VERNOVA
    • 11.1.14.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.14.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.14.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.14.3.1 Deals
      • 11.1.14.3.2 Other developments
  • 11.1.15 HALLIBURTON
    • 11.1.15.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.15.2 Products offered
    • 11.1.15.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.15.3.1 Deals
• 11.2 OTHER KEY MARKET PLAYERS
  • 11.2.1 CLIMEWORKS AG
  • 11.2.2 CARBON CLEAN SOLUTIONS
  • 11.2.3 OCCIDENTAL
  • 11.2.4 GREEN MINERALS
  • 11.2.5 CARBICRETE
  • 11.2.6 CARBONFREE
  • 11.2.7 SVANTE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
  • 11.2.8 GREEN POWER INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.
  • 11.2.9 WOLF MIDSTREAM
  • 11.2.10 BABCOCK & WILCOX

12 EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

• 12.1 MICROBIAL ELECTROSYNTHESIS (MES)
  • 12.1.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 12.1.2 DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • 12.1.3 KEY COMPANIES/COUNTRIES/INSTITUTES RESEARCHING MES
    • 12.1.3.1 List of companies/universities
    • 12.1.3.2 Investment and funding scenario
      • 12.1.3.2.1 LanzaTech
      • 12.1.3.2.2 Electrochaea
  • 12.1.4 MNM VIEW ON GROWTH POTENTIAL/FUTURE OUTLOOK
• 12.2 CO2 CAPTURE USING ADSORPTION TECHNIQUE (USING ZEOLITE AS ADSORBENT)
  • 12.2.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 12.2.2 DETAILED DESCRIPTION
    • 12.2.2.1 Zeolite A for CO2 capture
      • 12.2.2.1.1 Modification of zeolite A for improved CO2 capture
        • 12.2.2.1.1.1 Amine modification
        • 12.2.2.1.1.2 Pore size modification
  • 12.2.3 KEY COMPANIES/COUNTRIES/INSTITUTES RESEARCHING
  • 12.2.4 MNM VIEW ON GROWTH POTENTIAL/FUTURE OUTLOOK
• 12.3 OTHER EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
  • 12.3.1 VACUUM SWING ADSORPTION
    • 12.3.1.1 Introduction
    • 12.3.1.2 Detailed description
    • 12.3.1.3 Key companies/countries/institutes involved in research
    • 12.3.1.4 MnM view on growth potential/future outlook
  • 12.3.2 UTILIZATION OF RESIDUAL HEAT FOR DIRECT AIR CAPTURE FOR RETROFIT
    • 12.3.2.1 Introduction
    • 12.3.2.2 Detailed description
    • 12.3.2.3 Key companies/countries/institutes involved in research
    • 12.3.2.4 MnM view on growth potential/future outlook
  • 12.3.3 BIOHYBRID PHOTOCATALYST METHOD USING METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORK (MOF)
    • 12.3.3.1 Introduction
    • 12.3.3.2 Detailed description
      • 12.3.3.2.1 Mechanism of biohybrid photocatalysis
      • 12.3.3.2.2 Advantages of biohybrid photocatalysis
    • 12.3.3.3 Key companies/countries/institutes involved in research
    • 12.3.3.4 MnM view on growth potential/future outlook
  • 12.3.4 PYROGENIC CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND STORAGE (PYCCS)
    • 12.3.4.1 Introduction
    • 12.3.4.2 Detailed description
    • 12.3.4.3 Key companies/countries/institutes involved in research
    • 12.3.4.4 MnM view on growth potential/future outlook
  • 12.3.5 MICROBIAL CARBONIC ANHYDRASE
    • 12.3.5.1 Introduction
    • 12.3.5.2 Detailed description
    • 12.3.5.3 Key companies/countries/institutes involved in research
    • 12.3.5.4 MnM view on growth potential/future outlook
  • 12.3.6 BLUE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY
    • 12.3.6.1 Introduction
    • 12.3.6.2 Detailed description
    • 12.3.6.3 Key companies/countries/institutes involved in research
    • 12.3.6.4 MnM view on growth potential/future outlook
  • 12.3.7 ELECTROCATALYTIC CO2 REDUCTION/ETHYLENE PRODUCTION
    • 12.3.7.1 Introduction
    • 12.3.7.2 Detailed description
    • 12.3.7.3 MnM view on growth potential/future outlook

13 APPENDIX

• 13.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE
• 13.2 KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS' SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
• 13.3 CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
• 13.4 RELATED REPORTS
• 13.5 AUTHOR DETAILS