시장보고서
상품코드
1806152

해상 풍력발전 시장 : 컴포넌트, 기초 유형, 터빈 용량, 용도, 최종사용자별 - 세계 예측(2025-2030년)

Offshore Wind Power Market by Component, Foundation Type, Turbine Capacity, Application, End-User - Global Forecast 2025-2030

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 191 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

해상 풍력발전 시장은 2024년에는 423억 8,000만 달러로 평가되었습니다. 2025년에는 455억 5,000만 달러에 이르고, CAGR 7.82%로 성장하여 2030년에는 665억 8,000만 달러에 달할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 : 2024년 423억 8,000만 달러
추정 연도 : 2025년 455억 5,000만 달러
예측 연도 : 2030년 665억 8,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 7.82%

정책, 기술, 시장 성장 촉진요인에 대한 종합적인 통찰력을 통해 새로운 해상풍력 발전 시대를 열다.

해상풍력 소개는 세계 탈탄소화 목표를 달성하고 에너지 안보를 강화하는 데 있어 이 재생에너지원이 재생에너지의 중요한 역할을 탐구하는 것에서 시작되었습니다. 터빈 설계의 급속한 발전은 청정 에너지에 대한 정책적 노력과 함께 전례 없는 성장과 기술적 성숙을 위한 발판을 마련하고 있습니다.

해상 풍력 발전의 상황을 형성하고, 미래 성장 기회를 촉진하고, 매우 중요한 기술 혁신과 정책 전환을 밝힙니다.

해상풍력 발전의 상황은 부유식 기초 기술과 메가 와트급 터빈 아키텍처의 비약적인 발전으로 인해 크게 변화하고 있습니다. 수심이 깊어짐에 따라 부유식 플랫폼은 기존의 고정식 바닥 구조물을 대체할 수 있는 대안으로 등장하여 이전에는 접근하기 어려웠던 심해 환경의 자원을 개방합니다. 이 혁신은 프로젝트의 수명 주기를 연장하고, 환경 발자국을 줄이면서 더 높은 에너지 수율을 달성할 수 있도록 약속합니다.

2025년 시행되는 미국 관세가 해상풍력 공급망 역학 및 프로젝트 실행 가능성에 미치는 복잡한 영향 평가

미국이 2025년 일부 해상풍력 부품에 관세를 부과하는 것은 프로젝트 개발자와 장비 제조업체에게 공급망과 비용에 대한 복잡한 고려사항을 야기하고 있습니다. 철탑, 터빈나셀, 해저케이블 등 주요 자재와 어셈블리에 수입 관세가 추가됨에 따라 이해관계자들은 조달 전략과 현지화 계획을 재평가해야 하는 상황입니다.

해상풍력의 구성 요소 구성, 기초 유형, 터빈 용량, 용도 및 최종 사용자 역학에 걸친 전략적 인사이트 추출

다차원적인 해상풍력 발전의 세분화에 대한 심층 분석에서 중요한 통찰력을 얻을 수 있습니다. 구성요소 구성은 전기 인프라, 하부구조, 터빈에 이르기까지 다양합니다. 하부 구조는 터빈을 해저에 고정하는 모노파일 솔루션과 함께 재킷형과 중력 기반 설계로 구분됩니다. 터빈 조립 자체는 나셀, 로터와 블레이드, 타워를 통합한 것으로, 각기 다른 엔지니어링, 제조 및 유지 보수 요구 사항이 있습니다.

북미, 중남미, 중동 및 아프리카, 아시아태평양 시장에서 해상풍력 부문의 지역적 역학에 대해 알아봅니다.

해상풍력 발전의 지역적 역학관계는 주요 지역별로 서로 다른 궤적과 전략적 요구를 드러내고 있습니다. 미주 지역에서는 미국과 캐나다가 연방 세액 공제 및 주정부 조달 의무에 힘입어 용량 목표를 확보하기 위한 규제 개혁과 경매 메커니즘을 빠르게 추진하고 있습니다. 이러한 정책적 수단은 프로젝트의 뱅커빌리티를 강화하여 신규 시장 진출기업을 유치하고, 개발업체, 항만 운영업체, 송전 전문업체간의 제휴를 통한 경쟁 구도를 형성하고 있습니다.

해상풍력 분야의 혁신, 전략적 파트너십, 경쟁사와의 차별화를 추진하고 있는 업계 선도 기업 조사

여러 대기업들이 전략적 파트너십, 기술 투자, 프로젝트 파이프라인을 통해 해상풍력 발전경쟁 구도를 형성하고 있습니다. 전 세계 터빈 제조업체들은 더 높은 발전 용량과 설치 면적을 줄일 수 있는 차세대 터빈 개발에 박차를 가하고 있습니다. 동시에, 에너지 회사와 전문 선박 운영사 컨소시엄이 물류 워크플로우를 최적화하고 프로젝트 실행 일정을 가속화하기 위해 등장하고 있습니다.

업계 리더들이 규제의 복잡성을 극복하고, 업무 효율성을 높이고, 지속 가능한 성장을 가속할 수 있는 전략적 제안을 제공합니다.

업계 리더들은 정책 참여와 규제 기관과의 전략적 협력을 우선시함으로써 일반적인 트렌드를 활용하고 복잡성을 극복할 수 있습니다. 인허가 당국 및 계통 운영자와의 적극적인 대화 채널을 구축하여 승인 시간을 단축하고 프로젝트 개발을 위한 협력적 경로를 촉진할 수 있습니다.

해상풍력 시장의 종합적인 분석을 뒷받침하는 엄격한 정성적 및 정량적 조사 접근법의 개요

본 분석을 뒷받침하는 조사방법은 견고성과 타당성을 확보하기 위해 엄격한 정성적 접근과 정량적 접근을 결합하여 분석에 활용하고 있습니다. 1차 조사는 터빈 OEM, 프로젝트 개발자, 전력 사업자, 규제 기관의 고위 경영진과의 심층 인터뷰로 구성되었습니다. 이러한 대화를 통해 기존 시장과 신흥 시장의 새로운 과제, 기술 채택 패턴, 정책 개혁의 영향에 대해 알아봤습니다.

진화하는 해상풍력 생태계의 이해관계자들의 전략적 과제와 미래 전망을 파악하기 위한 주요 조사 결과의 통합.

결론적으로, 해상풍력 발전 부문은 급속한 기술 발전, 진화하는 정책 프레임워크, 역동적인 시장 세력에 의해 정의되는 매우 중요한 교차로에 서 있습니다. 부유식 기초 시스템, 메가와트급 터빈, 디지털 자산 관리 솔루션의 통합은 더 깊고 도전적인 해양 환경에서 새로운 개발 기회를 열어주고 있습니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 역학

제6장 시장 인사이트

  • Porter's Five Forces 분석
  • PESTEL 분석

제7장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 해상 풍력발전 시장 : 컴포넌트별

  • 전기 인프라
    • 해상 변전소
    • 해저 케이블
  • 하부 구조
    • 재킷 및 중력 기반
    • 모노파일
  • 터빈
    • 나셀
    • 로터 및 블레이드
    • 타워

제9장 해상 풍력발전 시장 : 기초 유형별

  • Fixed Bottom
  • Floating

제10장 해상 풍력발전 시장 : 터빈 용량별

  • 3-5MW
  • 5MW 이상
  • 최대 3MW

제11장 해상 풍력발전 시장 : 용도별

  • 상업
  • 산업

제12장 해상 풍력발전 시장 : 최종사용자별

  • 정부
  • 민간 발전사업자

제13장 아메리카의 해상 풍력발전 시장

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 아르헨티나

제14장 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카의 해상 풍력발전 시장

  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 아랍에미리트(UAE)
  • 사우디아라비아
  • 남아프리카공화국
  • 덴마크
  • 네덜란드
  • 카타르
  • 핀란드
  • 스웨덴
  • 나이지리아
  • 이집트
  • 튀르키예
  • 이스라엘
  • 노르웨이
  • 폴란드
  • 스위스

제15장 아시아태평양의 해상 풍력발전 시장

  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국
  • 인도네시아
  • 태국
  • 필리핀
  • 말레이시아
  • 싱가포르
  • 베트남
  • 대만

제16장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • Acciona, SA
    • Envision Energy USA Limited
    • AEROVIDE GmbH
    • Alstom SA
    • AREVA S.A
    • Chongqing Haizhuang Windpower Equipment Co.,Ltd.
    • Darwind B.V.
    • DNV AS Group
    • Dongfang Electric Corporation Ltd.
    • Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
    • EDF S.A
    • Duke Energy Corporation
    • EON UK plc
    • GE Vernova
    • Goldwind Science&Technology Co., Ltd
    • Hitachi Energy Ltd.
    • Prysmian S.p.A
    • SEA WIND MANAGEMENT GmbH
    • Shanghai Electric Group Company Limited
    • Siemens AG
    • Suzlon Energy Limited
    • Vestas Wind Systems A/S
    • Nordex SE
    • Orsted A/S

제17장 리서치 AI

제18장 리서치 통계

제19장 리서치 컨택트

제20장 리서치 기사

제21장 부록

LSH 25.09.17

The Offshore Wind Power Market was valued at USD 42.38 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 45.55 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.82%, reaching USD 66.58 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 42.38 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 45.55 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 66.58 billion
CAGR (%) 7.82%

Navigating the Emerging Offshore Wind Power Era Through Comprehensive Insights into Policy, Technology, and Market Drivers

The introduction to the offshore wind power domain opens with an exploration of the vital role this renewable energy source plays in achieving global decarbonization targets and bolstering energy security. Rapid advancements in turbine design, coupled with policy commitments to clean energy, are converging to set the stage for unprecedented growth and technological maturation.

Initially, the industry's momentum has been fueled by aggressive emissions reduction mandates across major economies, encouraging substantial investment in coastal and deeper-water wind installations. Furthermore, cost reductions in component manufacturing and installation techniques have contributed to driving down levelized costs of energy to unprecedented levels. These trends underscore a fundamental shift: offshore wind is evolving from a niche technology to a cornerstone of diversified energy portfolios.

Moreover, collaborative efforts between governments, developers, and technology providers have catalyzed a vibrant ecosystem in which innovation thrives. As a result, stakeholders are increasingly focused on optimizing project delivery cycles, enhancing supply chain resilience, and integrating digital solutions for predictive maintenance and operational efficiency. In this context, the subsequent sections will unpack the transformative shifts, regulatory complexities, segmentation dynamics, and strategic imperatives shaping the future of offshore wind power.

Unveiling Pivotal Technological Innovations and Policy Shifts Reshaping the Offshore Wind Power Landscape and Driving Future Growth Opportunities

The offshore wind landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by breakthroughs in floating foundation technologies and megawatt-scale turbine architectures. As water depths increase, floating platforms have emerged as viable alternatives to traditional fixed-bottom structures, unlocking resources in deeper marine environments that were previously inaccessible. This innovation promises to extend project lifecycles and deliver higher energy yields with reduced environmental footprints.

Simultaneously, turbine capacities continue to escalate, with units exceeding 12 MW entering service and enabling economies of scale that challenge onshore alternatives. These large-scale turbines demand novel installation vessels, advanced grid integration solutions, and digital twin frameworks for real-time performance monitoring. Consequently, collaborative research and development partnerships among OEMs, vessel operators, and software providers are becoming pivotal to maintain competitive advantage.

In parallel, policy architectures are evolving to support accelerated permit approvals and streamlined auction designs. By integrating environmental safeguards and community engagement protocols, regulators aim to balance ecological preservation with the urgent need for renewable energy. This policy recalibration, combined with financing mechanisms such as green bonds and public-private partnerships, is exerting a profound influence on project bankability and global investment flows. Together, these technological and regulatory shifts are redefining the contours of offshore wind power and charting a course toward sustainable, large-scale deployment.

Assessing the Complex Implications of United States Tariffs Enacted in 2025 on Supply Chain Dynamics and Project Viability in Offshore Wind

The introduction of United States tariffs on select offshore wind power components in 2025 has created a complex web of supply chain and cost considerations for project developers and equipment manufacturers alike. Key materials and assemblies including steel towers, turbine nacelles, and subsea cables now carry added import duties, compelling stakeholders to reevaluate procurement strategies and localization plans.

As a direct response, many industry participants are accelerating efforts to establish domestic manufacturing hubs and forge strategic alliances with local fabricators. While this movement fosters job creation and supply chain resilience, it also introduces transitional challenges related to workforce training, quality assurance, and scaling production capacity to meet burgeoning demand. Moreover, the recalibration of vendor agreements and logistics frameworks has necessitated revised project timelines and risk mitigation measures.

In addition, developers are exploring pricing adjustments and contract renegotiations to manage the impact of added costs without jeopardizing project viability. Through a combination of design optimization, modular construction techniques, and phased implementation approaches, some initiatives have been able to offset tariff influences while preserving value for equity and debt stakeholders. Ultimately, these adaptive strategies underscore the sector's capacity to navigate regulatory complexities and maintain momentum toward clean energy objectives despite external headwinds.

Distilling Strategic Insights Across Component Configurations, Foundation Types, Turbine Capacities, Applications, and End-User Dynamics in Offshore Wind

Key insights emerge from a detailed analysis of offshore wind power segmentation across multiple dimensions. Component configurations span electrical infrastructure, substructures, and turbines. Electrical infrastructure encompasses offshore substations and subsea cables that form the grid backbone, while substructures are differentiated into jacket and gravity-based designs alongside monopile solutions that anchor turbines to the seafloor. Turbine assemblies themselves integrate nacelles, rotors and blades, and towers, each representing distinct engineering, manufacturing, and maintenance requirements.

Foundation type further diversifies project profiles by distinguishing between fixed-bottom solutions suitable for shallower waters and floating platforms designed for deeper marine environments. These categories reflect significant differences in capital intensity, installation methods, and lifecycle performance metrics. Turbine capacities create another layer of differentiation, with segments ranging from up to 3 MW machines to units in the 3-5 MW bracket, and those exceeding 5 MW, each offering unique trade-offs between energy yield and site suitability.

Applications bifurcate into commercial and industrial deployments, where commercial projects often focus on utility-scale generation feeding national grids, and industrial installations may leverage captive power models for energy-intensive operations. End-user dynamics mirror these applications, with government bodies and independent power producers shaping demand through procurement frameworks, financing approaches, and long-term energy commitments. By examining these segmentation axes holistically, stakeholders can identify niche opportunities and optimize resource allocation across the offshore wind value chain.

Exploring Regional Dynamics in the Offshore Wind Sector Across the Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia Pacific Markets

Regional dynamics in offshore wind power reveal distinct trajectories and strategic imperatives across key geographies. In the Americas, the United States and Canada are rapidly advancing regulatory reforms and auction mechanisms to secure capacity targets, supported by federal tax credits and state procurement mandates. These policy instruments are enhancing project bankability and attracting new entrants, leading to a competitive landscape marked by alliances between developers, port operators, and transmission specialists.

Europe, the Middle East, and Africa collectively represent the longest-established offshore wind markets, with North Sea installations serving as a global benchmark for technology deployment and operational excellence. Auction reforms in countries such as the United Kingdom, Germany, and the Netherlands are focusing on circular economy principles and environmental stewardship, while emerging markets in the Mediterranean and Gulf regions explore hybrid renewable hubs integrating wind with solar and storage assets.

Across the Asia Pacific, ambitious capacity targets in China, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea are driving intense activity in manufacturing, project development, and regional cooperation initiatives. Governments are incentivizing domestic supply chains and facilitating grid integration enhancements to accommodate high-voltage direct current transmission corridors. Collectively, these region-specific strategies underscore the importance of tailored policy frameworks and collaborative business models in unlocking the full potential of offshore wind in diverse environmental and regulatory contexts.

Surveying Leading Industry Participants Driving Innovation, Strategic Partnerships, and Competitive Differentiation in the Offshore Wind Power Sector

Several leading players are shaping the competitive landscape of offshore wind power through strategic partnerships, technology investments, and project pipelines. Global turbine manufacturers are racing to develop next-generation machines that offer higher capacity factors and reduced installation footprints. At the same time, consortiums between energy companies and specialized vessel operators are emerging to optimize logistical workflows and accelerate project execution timelines.

Innovation is also being driven by integrated energy solutions providers that combine offshore wind with complementary assets such as green hydrogen production, energy storage, and interconnector projects. These cross-value-chain collaborations not only enhance the reliability of power delivery but also open new revenue streams through ancillary services and multipurpose platform designs.

Furthermore, companies with strong regional footholds are leveraging local content requirements and community engagement programs to solidify their social license to operate. By investing in workforce development and technology transfer initiatives, they are establishing long-term partnerships with ports, research institutions, and supply chain stakeholders. As a result, the competitive environment is characterized by a blend of global scale, regional expertise, and diversified business models that collectively drive innovation and resilience in the offshore wind power sector.

Delivering Strategic Recommendations for Industry Leaders to Navigate Regulatory Complexities, Enhance Operational Efficiency, and Foster Sustainable Growth

Industry leaders can capitalize on prevailing trends and navigate complexity by prioritizing policy engagement and strategic alignment with regulatory bodies. Establishing proactive dialogue channels with permitting authorities and grid operators can accelerate approval timelines and foster collaborative pathways for project development.

Simultaneously, diversifying supply chains through localized manufacturing hubs and multi-sourcing agreements will mitigate exposure to external tariff fluctuations and logistical bottlenecks. By integrating digital platforms for supplier management and predictive analytics, firms can enhance transparency and responsiveness across the procurement lifecycle.

Operational excellence can be further advanced by adopting modular construction approaches and standardizing component interfaces. This will reduce on-site installation risks and compress project schedules. Additionally, investing in workforce training programs and competency frameworks will ensure that emerging technical requirements-particularly for floating foundation systems and advanced turbine models-are met with highly skilled execution teams.

Finally, embedding sustainability metrics into project planning-ranging from carbon accounting to circular economy initiatives-will align corporate objectives with stakeholder expectations and strengthen access to green financing instruments. Collectively, these recommendations provide a comprehensive roadmap for industry leaders seeking to secure long-term success in an increasingly competitive and regulated offshore wind environment.

Outlining Rigorous Qualitative and Quantitative Research Approaches Underpinning the Comprehensive Analysis of the Offshore Wind Power Market

The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines rigorous qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robustness and validity. Primary research comprised in-depth interviews with senior executives from turbine OEMs, project developers, utility operators, and regulatory agencies. These conversations explored emerging challenges, technology adoption patterns, and policy reform impacts across established and emerging markets.

Secondary research involved a systematic review of academic journals, technical white papers, regulatory filings, and industry conference proceedings. This extensive literature evaluation provided historical context and benchmarked best practices in offshore wind power deployment. Data triangulation was employed to reconcile disparate sources and validate key trends through cross-referencing input from market participants and public domain data sets.

A structured framework guided the segmentation analysis, aligning component, foundation, capacity, application, and end-user dimensions with real-world project data. Regional assessments integrated energy policy reviews, auction results, and grid integration reports to capture the unique dynamics influencing capacity roll-out and competitive positioning. Throughout the process, a stringent quality assurance protocol-featuring peer review and expert validation-ensured that insights are factually accurate and reflective of the latest industry developments.

Synthesizing Key Findings to Illuminate Strategic Imperatives and Future Outlook for Stakeholders in the Evolving Offshore Wind Power Ecosystem

In conclusion, the offshore wind power sector stands at a pivotal juncture defined by rapid technological advancements, evolving policy frameworks, and dynamic market forces. The integration of floating foundation systems, megawatt-scale turbines, and digital asset management solutions is unlocking new frontier opportunities in deeper and more challenging marine environments.

At the same time, regulatory interventions such as the 2025 United States tariffs have underscored the critical importance of supply chain resilience and localization strategies. By embracing segmentation insights across component configurations, foundation types, capacity classes, applications, and end-user profiles, stakeholders can tailor their approaches to maximize value capture in diverse contexts.

Region-specific dynamics in the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific highlight the need for adaptive policy engagement, localized partnerships, and innovation ecosystems that bridge technology, finance, and community interests. As competitive differentiation intensifies, leading companies are forging alliances that transcend traditional boundaries, integrating offshore wind with storage, hydrogen production, and grid interconnectivity solutions.

Ultimately, the future of offshore wind power will be shaped by those who can blend strategic foresight with operational execution, aligning sustainability imperatives with financial and technical rigor. This synthesis of insights provides a clear roadmap for decision-makers seeking to navigate uncertainty and drive long-term growth in a rapidly evolving energy landscape.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Rapid expansion of floating offshore wind farms driving energy production in deepwater zones
  • 5.2. Integration of digital twin technology optimizing maintenance and performance of large turbines
  • 5.3. Strategic partnerships between oil majors and renewable developers accelerating offshore wind investments
  • 5.4. Advancements in high-capacity inter-array cabling reducing transmission losses across turbine networks
  • 5.5. Emergence of hybrid wind and green hydrogen platforms transforming offshore energy supply chains
  • 5.6. Emerging regulatory frameworks shaping cross-border offshore wind project approvals in Europe
  • 5.7. Innovations in seabed foundation designs lowering installation costs in deepwater and complex soils
  • 5.8. Deployment of next-generation high-capacity cabling slashes transmission losses across offshore turbine networks
  • 5.9. Adoption of high-voltage direct current links expanding offshore wind export capacity to continental grids
  • 5.10. Adoption of robotic blade inspection drones enhancing maintenance safety and reducing downtime costs

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Offshore Wind Power Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Electrical Infrastructure
    • 8.2.1. Offshore Substations
    • 8.2.2. Subsea Cables
  • 8.3. Substructure
    • 8.3.1. Jacket & Gravity Based
    • 8.3.2. Monopile
  • 8.4. Turbines
    • 8.4.1. Nacelle
    • 8.4.2. Rotors & Blades
    • 8.4.3. Tower

9. Offshore Wind Power Market, by Foundation Type

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Fixed Bottom
  • 9.3. Floating

10. Offshore Wind Power Market, by Turbine Capacity

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. 3-5 MW
  • 10.3. Above 5 MW
  • 10.4. Up To 3 MW

11. Offshore Wind Power Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Commercial
  • 11.3. Industrial

12. Offshore Wind Power Market, by End-User

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Government
  • 12.3. Independent Power Producers

13. Americas Offshore Wind Power Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. United States
  • 13.3. Canada
  • 13.4. Mexico
  • 13.5. Brazil
  • 13.6. Argentina

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Offshore Wind Power Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. United Kingdom
  • 14.3. Germany
  • 14.4. France
  • 14.5. Russia
  • 14.6. Italy
  • 14.7. Spain
  • 14.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 14.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 14.10. South Africa
  • 14.11. Denmark
  • 14.12. Netherlands
  • 14.13. Qatar
  • 14.14. Finland
  • 14.15. Sweden
  • 14.16. Nigeria
  • 14.17. Egypt
  • 14.18. Turkey
  • 14.19. Israel
  • 14.20. Norway
  • 14.21. Poland
  • 14.22. Switzerland

15. Asia-Pacific Offshore Wind Power Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. China
  • 15.3. India
  • 15.4. Japan
  • 15.5. Australia
  • 15.6. South Korea
  • 15.7. Indonesia
  • 15.8. Thailand
  • 15.9. Philippines
  • 15.10. Malaysia
  • 15.11. Singapore
  • 15.12. Vietnam
  • 15.13. Taiwan

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Acciona, SA
    • 16.3.2. Envision Energy USA Limited
    • 16.3.3. AEROVIDE GmbH
    • 16.3.4. Alstom SA
    • 16.3.5. AREVA S.A
    • 16.3.6. Chongqing Haizhuang Windpower Equipment Co.,Ltd.
    • 16.3.7. Darwind B.V.
    • 16.3.8. DNV AS Group
    • 16.3.9. Dongfang Electric Corporation Ltd.
    • 16.3.10. Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
    • 16.3.11. EDF S.A
    • 16.3.12. Duke Energy Corporation
    • 16.3.13. EON UK plc
    • 16.3.14. GE Vernova
    • 16.3.15. Goldwind Science&Technology Co., Ltd
    • 16.3.16. Hitachi Energy Ltd.
    • 16.3.17. Prysmian S.p.A
    • 16.3.18. SEA WIND MANAGEMENT GmbH
    • 16.3.19. Shanghai Electric Group Company Limited
    • 16.3.20. Siemens AG
    • 16.3.21. Suzlon Energy Limited
    • 16.3.22. Vestas Wind Systems A/S
    • 16.3.23. Nordex SE
    • 16.3.24. Orsted A/S

17. ResearchAI

18. ResearchStatistics

19. ResearchContacts

20. ResearchArticles

21. Appendix

샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제